Physiological Responses and Tolerance of Halophyte <i>Sesuvium portulacastrum</i> L. to Cesium

Nikalje, Ganesh C.; Shrivastava, Manoj; Nikam, T. D.; Suprasanna, Penna

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9863002

Advances in Agriculture

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 9863002 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9863002

Physiological Responses and Tolerance of Halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum L. to Cesium

Ganesh C. Nikalje,^1,2Manoj Shrivastava,^2,3T. D. Nikam,⁴and Penna Suprasanna²

Academic Editor: Euripedes Garcia Silveira Junior

Received09 Sept 2022

Accepted06 Oct 2022

Published18 Oct 2022

Abstract

Cesium (Cs) is a soil contaminant and toxic to the ecosystem, especially the plant species. In this study, we have assessed the potential of a halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum for its Cs tolerance and accumulation. Thirty days old S. portulacastrum plants were subjected to different concentrations of Cs (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs) using cesium chloride. The biomass and photosynthetic pigments were not affected up to 25 mg·L⁻¹ Cs treatment while a significant decline in pigment levels was observed at higher concentrations. The Cs treatments increased protein content at low concentrations while higher concentrations were inhibitory. Under Cs exposure, significant induction of antioxidant enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) was observed. The antioxidant enzyme activities were upregulated up to 50 mg·L⁻¹ Cs but decreased significantly at 150 mg·L⁻¹. The accumulation of Cs was dose and tissue-dependent as evidenced by a higher accumulation of Cs in leaves (536.10 μg·g⁻¹) as compared to stem (413.74 μg·g⁻¹) and roots (284.69 μg·g⁻¹). The results suggest that S. portulacastrum is a hyper-accumulator of Cs and could be useful for the phytoremediation of Cs-contaminated soils.

1. Introduction

The excess level of cesium (Cs) in soil imposes a negative impact on plant growth and development [1]. Cs restricts the uptake of potassium (K) due to its chemical resemblance with potassium and creates severe potassium deficiency followed by subsequent chlorosis in plants [2, 3]. Most of the Cs in the natural atmosphere are nonradioactive Cs-133 and are present in the soil at about 25 μg·g⁻¹ soil [4]. The group I alkali metal Cs is mostly nonradioactive Cs-133 but some occur as radioactive isotopes (Cs-137, Cs-134) which enter into the ecosystem [5]. It is not only incorporated into the food chain but also emits β and γ radiations which have long half-lives [6]. Different physical and chemical methods are used for the removal of radionuclides and toxic metals. However, their widespread and large-scale applications have limitations due to high costs and some side effects [7]. Some alkaliphilic bacteria such as Microbacterium sp TS-1 can grow in presence of 1.2 M cesium chloride [8]. The studies on ecto- and endo-mycorrhizal fungi revealed that they reduce Cs toxicity by limiting Cs availability to their host plant through immobilization between 10 and 100% of the total Cs activity [9]. Some plant species are endowed with the ability to extract or absorb radionuclides and other heavy metals from the soil. This ability can be utilized for environmental clean-up. Under increasing Cs treatment (0.4 mM, to 3 mM), Arabidopsis thaliana, Calla palustris, Pennisetum purpureum, and Ocimum basilicum showed increased uptake of Cs [10–13], respectively. Similarly, Sorghum bicolor accumulated 5270 mg·kg⁻¹ in roots and 4513 mg·kg⁻¹ in hydroponically grown aerial parts without significant change in plant height and dry weight [14].

Being native flora of saline soils, halophytic plants are better suited to tolerate high salt due to efficient ROS scavenging, compartmentation, and excretion mechanisms to maintain water balance [15, 16]. This mechanism of tolerance in halophytes has also been shown towards metal stress and different inorganic pollutants [17–19]. S. portulacastrum is a facultative halophyte that grows luxuriantly on the tropical and subtropical shores of five continents [20]. It is highly tolerant to different abiotic stresses such as salt, drought, heavy metals, and textile dyes [20]. In the last decade, apart from its salt tolerance mechanism, this plant has been extensively studied for its applicability in phytoremediation of heavy metals such as cadmium, arsenic, lead, nickel, copper [21–23], textile dyes [24], and desalination [25]. Sesuvium plants rapidly uptake the toxic compounds and translocate them to aerial parts such as leaves. In leaves, these compounds are sequestered into vacuoles without any toxicity [26]. However, the effect of stable Cs on S. portulacastrum has not been studied warranting such studies will help to assess toxicity and/or accumulation.

The evaluation of Sesuvium for cultivation on Cs-contaminated soil requires a study about Cs toxicity, tolerance, and accumulation in different organs. Therefore, the responses of Sesuvium to Cs were studied in hydroponics to provide a homogenous substrate and avoid interference of soil particles. The effect of increasing the concentration of Cs was analyzed by monitoring plant growth in terms of root length, shoot length and fresh weight, and physiological and biochemical status in terms of percent tissue water content, chlorophyll content, phosphate soluble proteins, and antioxidant enzymes. The hypothesis of this study is that Sesuvium is a hyper-accumulator of Cs and the objectives are to study the Cs accumulation potential of Sesuvium and analyze the effect of Cs on the growth and biochemical responses of Sesuvium.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

In the present study, a facultative halophyte S. portulacastrum L. was assessed for accumulation and tolerance to stable Cs (¹³³Cs). The shoots (4–5 cm long) of naturally grown S. portulacastrum were collected from the coastal areas of Mumbai, India (19°03′51.6″N 72°58′44.2″E). The plants were surface sterilized and hydroponically maintained as per Nikalje et al. [19]. The experiments were carried out in a plant growth chamber (Sanyo, Japan) with 14 h: 10 hr light/dark cycle, 25/22°C day/night temperature, light intensity 150 μE·m⁻²·S⁻¹, and relative humidity 65–75%. After four weeks of growth, seedlings were subjected to different Cs treatments.

2.2. Cesium Treatment

The rooted shoots were transferred (twelve plants per treatment) into 500 ml half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution added with Cs at various concentrations: 0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 150 mg·L⁻¹ using cesium chloride. The plants were harvested after 28 days. The plant parts viz. root, stem, and leaves were separated and used for further analysis.

2.3. Growth and Biochemical Attributes

Plant growth was measured in terms of root length, shoot length, and root and shoot percent tissue water content (%TWC). The fresh weight (FW) was immediately taken; leaves, stem, and roots were oven dried separately at 60°C till constant dry weight (DW).

Percent tissue water (%TWC) content was calculated using the following formula [26]:

For the estimation of Chl a, Chl b, and total chlorophyll, the leaves (300 mg) were crushed in 5 ml chilled 80% acetone in precooled mortar and pestle in the dark. After centrifugation, the absorbance of the supernatant was taken at 645 and 663 nm [27].

The extraction and estimation of soluble protein content were performed as per Lowry’s method [28] where Bovin serum albumin served as standard. The antioxidant enzymes activities such as superoxide dismutase [29], catalase [30], ascorbate peroxidase [31], and glutathione reductase [32] were performed with some modifications given by Nikalje et al. [19].

2.4. Cesium Quantification

After oven drying at 60°C, the plant samples (roots, stem and leaves separately) were finely ground, weighed (quantity in ), and digested using 10 ml of the di-acid mixture (HNO₃: HClO₄) (5: 1) on a hot plate. The Cs content in the digested extract was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (GBC906AA, Australia) using Cs hollow cathode lamp at 852 nm wavelength.

2.5. Experimental Design and Statistical Analyses

All the experiments were performed in completely randomized design in triplicates. A total of 12 plants were subjected to each treatment and three biological and technical replicates were used for each studied parameter. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the statistical software SPSS 20.0. The treatment means were compared by using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 0.05 and data were expressed as mean ± SE.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Growth and dry Biomass

S. portulacastrum plants were challenged with different levels of Cs viz, 0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 150 mg·L⁻¹. The results showed that up to 25 mg·L⁻¹ Cs, plants did not exhibit significant growth retardation but slight growth enhancement was observed at 5 and 10 mg·L⁻¹ Cs. When Cs was applied beyond 50 mg·L⁻¹, chlorosis was observed, and growth was significantly inhibited (Figure 1). At 5 and 10 mg·L⁻¹ Cs, it was seen that the root length was higher as compared to control and other treatments while there were no significant changes in shoot length (Figure 2). On application of 25, 50, and 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs, the length of both root and shoot was decreased gradually. At 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs treatment the root and shoot length decreased significantly by 1.83-fold and 1.8-fold, respectively, at p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 2).

3.2. Percent Tissue Water Content (%TWC)

The percent tissue water content of both the root and shoot showed a similar trend (Figure 3). The %TWC increased gradually up to 25 mg·L⁻¹ Cs while it decreased significantly at 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs. At 50 mg·L⁻¹, the %TWC was not significantly different from that of the control.

3.3. Chlorophyll Pigments

The chlorophyll pigments were highly susceptible to high Cs treatment (Figure 4). The total chlorophyll, chlorophyll-a, and chlorophyll-b contents were maintained up to 10 mg·L⁻¹ Cs concentration. However, Cs treatment of 25 mg·L⁻¹ and above caused a gradual decrease in the content of chlorophyll pigments. As compared to the control, the total chlorophyll, chlorophyll-a, and Chlorophyll-b content was decreased at 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs by 2.08, 2.76, and 2.7-fold, respectively, at p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 3).

3.4. Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Both root and shoot tissues showed similar antioxidant enzyme activities viz. superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR) under Cs exposure (Figures 5(a)–5(d)). The antioxidant enzyme activities were significantly increased up to 50 mg·L⁻¹ Cs, treatment while, higher concentration (150 mg·L⁻¹) induced a significant decrease in enzyme activities. The SOD activity was increased by 2-fold in the root and 2.5-fold in the shoot at 50 mg·L⁻¹ Cs while it was decreased by 1.4–1.5-fold in the root and shoot at 150 mg L⁻¹ Cs (Figure 5(a)). The CAT activity was increased by 2.1-fold in the root and 1.8-fold in the shoot at 50 mg·L⁻¹ Cs while 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs induced a decrease in activity by 1.7-fold in the root and 1.2-fold in the shoot (Figure 5(b)). A similar trend was observed in the case of APX activity which recorded an increase of 1.5-fold in root and 2.4-fold in the shoot at 50 mg·L¹ Cs and a decrease of 1.9-fold in root and 1.5-fold in the shoot at 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs (Figure 5(c)). Compared to other enzymes, the GR activity showed higher activity (3.4-fold in the root and 5-fold in the shoot at 50 mg·L⁻¹ Cs) whereas 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs induced a decrease of 0.8-fold in the root. Although GR activity was decreased at 150 mg·L⁻¹ Cs in the shoot, it was still 3-fold higher than control plants (Figure 5(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.5. Cesium Accumulation in Different Plant Parts

The accumulation of Cs in different parts of the plant (root, stem, and leaves) is depicted in Figure 6; The Cs accumulation was higher in aerial parts (leaves and stem) as compared to underground parts (root). In leaves, the Cs level was highest (536.10 μg·g⁻¹) followed by the stem (413.74 μg·g⁻¹) and roots (284.69 μg·g⁻¹) suggesting the dose and tissue-specific nature of Cs accumulation in Sesuvium.

4. Discussion

The presence of metal toxicants including radiocesium in soil, water, and air can cause serious consequences to human health and the environment [33]. A recent survey on heavy metal pollution of global rivers and water lakes revealed that the concentration of heavy metals in these water bodies is exceeding significantly the standard threshold limits as per World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [34]. Phytoremediation is one of the plant-based approaches to manage environmental toxicity [35]. The results of our study demonstrated that the impact of Cs depends on the level of accumulation and localization besides the tolerance of the plant species. It was observed that the growth of root and shoot along with their relative water content was not affected at 25 mg·L⁻¹ of Cs in Sesuvium. In Calendula alata, Borghei et al. [36] observed maintenance of plant growth, root length, shoot length, and chlorophyll contents at lower concentrations up to 10 mg·L⁻¹ Cs but beyond this concentration, growth was retarded. Higher Cs concentration (3 M Cs) also showed a reduction in shoot growth in the Cs hyper-accumulator Pennisetum purpureum [10]. Excessive Cs has also been found to induce black roots and slow growth in Brassica juncea seedlings [37]. Higher concentrations of Cs affected the number of germinated seeds and roots and the shoot length of seedlings [38]. Our results showed that increasing the concentration of Cs caused a reduction in the total chlorophyll content including, chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b. The Cs-induced inhibition of chlorophyll content has also been observed in other plant species, such as Spinacia oleracea [39] Nitella pseudoflabellata [40], Salix paraplesia [41], and Brassica juncea [37].

The toxic metals induce different morphological, physiological, and biochemical dysfunctions by the generation of reactive oxygen species which impose damaging effects on plants [42]. In Arabidopsis, exogenous application of a small chemical compound namely CsToAcE increased Cs accumulation and tolerance. The CsToAcE1 interacts with a plant protein BETA GLUCOSIDASE 23 (AtβGLU23) and suppresses it. This protein negatively regulates plant response to Cs [43]. Plants cope with the toxic effects of heavy metals by the induction of an efficient antioxidant defense system. Our results indicated that higher antioxidant enzymatic activity (GR activity, 3.4-fold higher in root and 5-fold in the shoot, at 50 mg·L⁻¹ of Cs) in S. portulacastrum suggesting the role of efficient antioxidant enzyme system in case of Cs tolerance. Enhanced induction of antioxidant defense (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) has also been shown under Cs treatment in Brassica juncea [44]. Recently, Adams et al. [1] have observed Cs-induced higher glutathione accumulation without reduction in the Cs accumulation pattern in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Cs being the competitor of potassium ion (K⁺) competes with potassium for uptake. The unavailability of potassium causes growth retardation in plants [45, 46]. In Gladiolus grandiflora, supplementation of potassium showed alleviation of Cd-induced toxicity [47]. Mostofa et al. [48] stated that improvement of plant potassium use efficiency can increase plant performance in Cs-contaminated soil. On the contrary, in the case of halophytes instead of potassium and chloride, sodium is an important macronutrient for their growth [49]. This could be the probable reason for the high tolerance of Cs in S. portulacastrum. A significantly higher amount of Cs was accumulated in the aerial parts (536.10 μg·g⁻¹ in leaves and 413.74 μg·g⁻¹ in the stem) as compared to the underground parts (284.69 μg g⁻¹ in roots) suggesting that root-to-shoot translocation of Cs is rapid in S. portulacastrum. Such efficient and rapid translocation of toxic compounds from root to shoot is a prerequisite for effective phytoremediation as previously suggested by other researchers [37, 44]. Our results suggest that the facultative nature of S. portulacastrum helps it to grow in both saline and nonsaline habitats offering an additional advantage over true halophytes which require a certain amount of salt for growth. Such halophytic species also can be useful as candidates for deciphering the mechanism of salt and metal tolerance, and also for isolating stress-responsive genes which can be applied to enhance the tolerance of sensitive, glycophytic plants [50].

5. Conclusions

This study concludes that S. portulacastrum is a hyper-accumulator of toxic Cs metal. The higher accumulation of Cs in aerial plant parts and less alteration in growth revealed the potential of Sesuvium as a suitable candidate for the phytoremediation of Cs-contaminated soil. The efficient antioxidant enzyme system and maintenance of growth are the key components of Cs tolerance in Sesuvium. It is recommended that S. portulacastrum can be cultivated in Cs-contaminated soils and near nuclear power plants for phytoremediation. Further studies are required to understand the precise molecular mechanism of Cs tolerance, the involvement of Sesuvium-associated microbes, and validation through field experiments to confirm the phytoremediation ability of Sesuvium.

Data Availability

All relevant data are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

E. Adams, T. Miyazaki, S. Watanabe, N. Ohkama-Ohtsu, M. Seo, and R. Shin, “Glutathione and its biosynthetic intermediates alleviate cesium stress in Arabidopsis,” Frontiers of Plant Science, vol. 10, p. 1711, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Adams, P. Abdollahi, and R. Shin, “Cesium inhibits plant growth through jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4545–4559, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kondo, T. Makino, T. Eguchi et al., “Comparative analysis of the relationship between Cs and K in soil and plant parts toward control of Cs accumulation in rice,” Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Rai and M. Kawabata, “The dynamics of radio-cesium in soils and mechanism of cesium uptake into higher plants: newly elucidated mechanism of cesium uptake into rice plants,” Frontiers of Plant Science, vol. 11, p. 528, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lutts and I. Lefevre, “How can we take advantage of halophyte properties to cope with heavy metal toxicity in salt-affected areas?” Annals of Botany, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 509–528, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. White and M. R. Broadley, “Tansley review No. 113,” New Phytologist, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 241–256, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ali, E. Khan, and M. A. Sajad, “Phytoremediation of heavy metals-concepts and applications,” Chemosphere, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 869–881, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Koretsune, Y. Ishida, Y. Kaneda et al., “Novel cesium resistance mechanism of alkaliphilic bacterium isolated from jumping spider ground extract,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 13, Article ID 841821, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dubchak, “Role of mycorrhizal fungi in Cesium upake by plants,” Impact of Cesium on Plants and the Environment, Gupta and Walther Springer Switzerland, Cham, Europe, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Kang, Y.-J. Seo, T. Saito, H. Suzuki, and Y. Ishii, “Uptake and translocation of cesium-133 in Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) under hydroponic conditions,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 82, pp. 122–126, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Ko, N. Furuta, and H. B. Lim, “Quantitative mapping of elements in basil leaves (Ocimum basilicum) based on cesium concentration and growth period using laser ablation ICP-MS,” Chemosphere, vol. 190, pp. 368–374, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kominkova, K. Berchová-Bímová, and L. Součková, “Influence of potassium concentration gradient on stable caesium uptake by Calla palustris,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 165, pp. 582–588, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sahr, G. Voigt, H. G. Paretzke, P. Schramel, and D. Ernst, “Cesium-affected gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana,” New Phytologist, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 747–754, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, C. Chen, and J. Wang, “Cs phytoremediation by Sorghum bicolor cultivated in soil and in hydroponic system,” International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 402–412, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Nikalje, S. J. Mirajkar, T. D. Nikam, and P. Suprasanna, “Multifarious role of ROS in halophytes: signaling and defense,” Abiotic Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
G. C. Nikalje, T. D. Nikam, and P. Suprasanna, “Looking at halophytic adaptation to high salinity through genomics landscape,” Current Genomics, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 542–552, 2017b.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Manousaki and N. Kalogerakis, “Halophytes: an emerging trend in phytoremediation,” International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 959–969, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Nikalje, A. K. Srivastava, G. K. Pandey, and P. Suprasanna, “Halophytes in biosaline agriculture: mechanism, utilization, and value addition,” Land Degradation & Development, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1081–1095, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Nikalje, P. S. Variyar, M. V. Joshi, T. D. Nikam, and P. Suprasanna, “Temporal and spatial changes in ion homeostasis and accumulation of flavanoids and glycolipid in a halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 4, Article ID e0193394, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. H. Lokhande, B. K. Gor, N. S. Desai, T. D. Nikam, and P. Suprasanna, “Sesuvium portulacastrum, a plant for drought, salt stress, sand fixation, food and phytoremediation. A review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 329–348, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ghnaya, H. Zaier, R. Baioui et al., “Implications of organic acids in the long-distance transport and accumulation of lead in Sesuvium portulacastrum and Brassica juncea,” Chemosphere, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1449–1454, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. H. Lokhande, V. Y. Patade, S. S. Srivastava, P. Suprasanna, M. Shrivastava, and G. Awasthi, “Copper accumulation and biochemical responses of Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.),” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 679–684, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zaier, T. Ghnaya, A. Lakhdar et al., “Comparative study of Pb-phytoextraction potential in Sesuvium portulacastrum and Brassica juncea: tolerance and accumulation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 183, pp. 609–615, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. H. Lokhande, S. Kudale, G. C. Nikalje, N. S. Desai, and P. Suprasanna, “Hairy root induction and phytoremediation of textile dye, Reactive green 19A-HE4BD, in a halophyte, Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L,” Biotechnology Reports, vol. 8, pp. 56–63, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Muchate, G. C. Nikalje, N. S. Rajurkar, P. Suprasanna, and T. D. Nikam, “Physiological responses of the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum to salt stress and their relevance for saline soil bio-reclamation,” Flora, vol. 224, pp. 96–105, 2016b.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Muchate, G. C. Nikalje, N. S. Rajurkar, P. Suprasanna, and T. D. Nikam, “Plant salt stress: adaptive responses, tolerance mechanism and bioengineering for salt tolerance,” The Botanical Review, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 371–406, 2016a.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. H. Witham, D. F. Blaydes, and R. M. Devlin, Experiments in Plant Physiology, Van Nostrand, New York, USA, 1971.
O. H. Lowry, N. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, “Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Becana, J. F. Moran, and I. Iturbe-Ormaetxe, “Iron-dependent oxygen free radical generation in plants subjected to environmental stress: toxicity and antioxidant protection,” Plant and Soil, vol. 201, pp. 137–147, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Cakmak and H. Marschner, “Magnesium deficiency and high light intensity enhance activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase in bean leaves,” Plant Physiology, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1222–1227, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Nakano and K. Asada, “Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxide in spinach chloroplasts,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 22, pp. 867–880, 1981.
View at: Google Scholar
I. K. Smith, T. L. Vierheller, and C. A. Thorne, “Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5, 5-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid),” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 408–413, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Burger and I. Lichtscheidl, “Stable and radioactive cesium: a review about distribution in the environment, uptake and translocation in plants, plant reactions and plants’ potential for bioremediation,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 618, pp. 1459–1485, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhou, N. Yang, Y. Li et al., “Total concentrations and sources of heavy metal pollution in global river and lake water bodies from 1972 to 2017,” Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 22, Article ID e00925, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Grzegorska, P. Rybarczyk, A. Rogala, and D. Zabrocki, “Phytoremediation-from environment cleaning to energy generation-current status and future perspectives,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2905, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Borghei, R. Arjmandi, and R. Moogouei, “Potential of Calendula alata for phytoremediation of stable cesium and lead from solutions,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 181, no. 1-4, pp. 63–68, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang and G. J. Liu, “Effects of cesium accumulation on chlorophyll content and fluorescence of Brassi8ca juncea L,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 195, pp. 26–32, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. De Medici, D. Komínková, M. Race, M. Fabbricino, and L. Součková, “Evaluation of the potential for caesium transfer from contaminated soil to the food chain as a consequence of uptake by edible vegetables,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 171, pp. 558–563, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xu, T. Yunlai, W. Jianbao, and W. Dan, “Study on the effects of cesium on photosynthesis of spinach,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 181, pp. 123–130, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
K. S. S. Atapaththu, M. H. Rashid, and T. Asaeda, “Growth and oxidative stress of brittlewort (Nitella pseudoflabellata) in response to cesium exposure,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 347–353, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhu, K. Chen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Yang, “Accumulation and physio-biochemical responses of Salix paraplesia to cesium stress,” Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 1515–1520, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Srivastava, P. K. Tandon, and K. Mishra, “The toxicity and accumulation of metals in crop plants,” Sustainable Solutions for Elemental Deficiency and Excess in Crop Plants, Springer, Singapore, pp. 53–68, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Moon, E. Adams, T. Miyazaki et al., “Cesium tolerance is enhanced by a chemical which binds to BETA-GLUCOSIDASE 23 in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, Article ID 21109, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Lai and X. G. Luo, “High-efficiency antioxidant system, chelating system and stress-responsive genes enhance tolerance to cesium ion toxicity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.),” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 181, pp. 491–498, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Adams, T. Miyazaki, S. Saito, N. Uozumi, and R. Shin, “Cesium inhibits plant growth primarily through reduction of potassium influx and accumulation in Arabidopsis,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Isobe, E. Nakajima, N. Morita, S. Kawakura, and M. Higo, “Effects of NaCl on growth and cesium absorption in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.),” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 230, no. 3, p. 66, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Yasin, W. U. Khan, S. R. Ahmad, A. Ali, A. Ahmad, and W. Akram, “Imperative roles of halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and kinetin in improving salt tolerance and growth of black gram (Phaseolus mungo),” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 4491–4505, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Mostofa, M. M. Rahman, T. K. Ghosh et al., “Potassium in plant physiological adaptation to abiotic stresses,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 186, pp. 279–289, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wang, Q. Zheng, Q. Shen, and S. Guo, “The critical role of potassium in plant stress response,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 7370–7390, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Nikalje and P. Suprasanna, “Coping with metal toxicity-cues from halophytes,” Frontiers of Plant Science, vol. 9, p. 777, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ganesh C. Nikalje et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

724

Downloads

624

Citations