Table of Contents
Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Volume 2014, Article ID 717803, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/717803
Research Article

Hybrid Wavelet-Postfix-GP Model for Rainfall Prediction of Anand Region of India

1Information Technology Department, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad 387001, India
2IICT, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad 380009, India

Received 11 January 2014; Accepted 15 May 2014; Published 2 June 2014

Academic Editor: Djamel Bouchaffra

Copyright © 2014 Vipul K. Dabhi and Sanjay Chaudhary. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Y. Jain, A. Sharma, S. Chaudhary, and V. K. Tyagi, “Spatial analysis for generating recommendations for agricultural crop production,” in Proceedings of the India Conference on Geospatial Technologies and Applications (ICGTA '12), 2012.
  2. L. R. Nayagam, R. Janardanan, and H. S. R. Mohan, “An empirical model for the seasonal prediction of southwest monsoon rainfall over Kerala, a meteorological subdivisionof India,” International Journal of Climatology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 823–831, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. DelSole and J. Shukla, “Linear prediction of Indian monsoon rainfall,” Journal of Climate, vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 3645–3658, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. R. Ganguly and R. L. Bras, “Distributed quantitative precipitation forecasting using information from radar and numerical weather prediction models,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1168–1180, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Diomede, S. Davolio, C. Marsigli et al., “Discharge prediction based on multi-model precipitation forecasts,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 101, no. 3-4, pp. 245–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Chatfield, The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction, CRC press, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  7. V. Babovic, “Data mining in hydrology,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1511–1515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. N. Q. Hung, M. S. Babel, S. Weesakul, and N. K. Tripathi, “An artificial neural network model for rainfall forecasting in Bangkok, Thailand,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1413–1425, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. P. Moustris, I. K. Larissi, P. T. Nastos, and A. G. Paliatsos, “Precipitation forecast using artificial neural networks in specific regions of Greece,” Water Resources Management, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1979–1993, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G.-F. Lin and L.-H. Chen, “Application of an artificial neural network to typhoon rainfall forecasting,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1825–1837, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. Babovic, R. Caňizares, H. R. Jensen, and A. Klinting, “Neural networks as routine for error updating of numerical models,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 181–193, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Sun, V. Babovic, and E. S. Chan, “Multi-step-ahead model error prediction using time-delay neural networks combined with chaos theory,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 395, no. 1-2, pp. 109–116, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. Babovic, S. A. Sannasiraj, and E. S. Chan, “Error correction of a predictive ocean wave model using local model approximation,” Journal of Marine Systems, vol. 53, no. 1–4, pp. 1–17, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Partal and H. K. Cigizoglu, “Prediction of daily precipitation using wavelet-neural networks,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 234–246, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Nasseri, K. Asghari, and M. J. Abedini, “Optimized scenario for rainfall forecasting using genetic algorithm coupled with artificial neural network,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1415–1421, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Wu, K. Chau, and C. Fan, “Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data-preprocessing techniques,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 146–167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. R. Koza, Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1992.
  18. V. Babovic, “Introducing knowledge into learning based on genetic programming,” Journal of Hydroinformatics, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 181–193, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Keijzer and V. Babovic, “Declarative and preferential bias in GP-based scientific discovery,” Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–79, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. V. Babovic and M. B. Abbott, “The evolution of equations from hydraulic data Part I: theory,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 397–430, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. Babovic and M. B. Abbott, “Evolution of equations from hydraulic data. Part II: applications,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 411–430, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. V. K. Dabhi and S. Chaudhary, “Empirical modeling using genetic programming: a survey of issues and approaches,” Natural Computing, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. O. Kisi and J. Shiri, “Precipitation forecasting using wavelet-genetic programming and wavelet-neuro-fuzzy conjunction models,” Water Resources Management, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 3135–3152, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S.-Y. Liong, T. R. Gautam, T. K. Soon, V. Babovic, M. Keijzer, and N. Muttil, “Genetic Programming: a new paradigm in rainfall runoff modeling,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 705–718, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Babovic and M. Keijzer, “Rainfall-runoff modelling based on genetic programming,” Nordic Hydrology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 331–346, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. T. Khu, S.-Y. Liong, V. Babovic, H. Madsen, and N. Muttil, “Genetic programming and its application in real-time runoff forecasting,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 439–451, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. B. Wijngaard, A. M. G. Klein Tank, and G. P. Können, “Homogeneity of 20th century European daily temperature and precipitation series,” International Journal of Climatology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 679–692, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets, vol. 61, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1992.
  29. S. Mallat, “A wavelet tour of signal processing,” A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. K. Dabhi and S. K. Vij, “Empirical modeling using symbolic regression via postfix genetic programming,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP '11), pp. 1–6, November 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. J. Keith and M. C. Martin, “Genetic programming in c++: implementation issues,” in Advances in Genetic Programming, pp. 285–310, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1992.
  33. C. Ferreira, “Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems,” Complex Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 87–129, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  34. M. O'Neil and C. Ryan, “Grammatical evolution,” in Grammatical Evolution, pp. 33–47, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Keijzer, V. Babovic, C. Ryan, M. O'Neill, and M. Cattolico, “Adaptive logic programming,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '01), pp. 42–49, 2001.
  36. V. K. Dabhi and S. Chaudhary, “Semantic sub-tree crossover operator for postfix genetic programming,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 391–402, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. Q. Uy, N. X. Hoai, and M. O'Neill, “Semantic aware crossover for genetic programming: the case for real-valued function regression,” in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Genetic Programming (EuroGP '09), pp. 292–302, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
  38. N. Q. Uy, N. X. Hoai, M. O'Neill, R. I. McKay, and E. Galván-López, “Semantically-based crossover in genetic programming: application to real-valued symbolic regression,” Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 91–119, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Gustafson, E. K. Burke, and N. Krasnogor, “On improving genetic programming for symbolic regression,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE CEC '05), vol. 1, pp. 912–919, September 2005. View at Scopus
  40. M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, E. Zitzler, and K. Deb, “Archiving with guaranteed convergence and diversity in multi-objective optimization,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '02), pp. 439–447, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2002.
  41. Microsoft, Microsoft.net framework software development kit, 2007, http://msdn.microsoft.com/.
  42. Zedgraph, 2008, http://sourceforge.net/projects/zedgraph/.
  43. N. J. De Vos and T. Rientjes, “Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 111–126, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus