## QualitativeÂ AnalysisÂ ofÂ Differential, DifferenceÂ Equations, and DynamicÂ Equations on Time Scales

View this Special IssueResearch Article | Open Access

Yan Zhang, Shujing Gao, Kuangang Fan, "On the Dynamics of a Nonautonomous Predator-Prey Model with Hassell-Varley Type Functional Response", *Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2014, Article ID 864678, 12 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/864678

# On the Dynamics of a Nonautonomous Predator-Prey Model with Hassell-Varley Type Functional Response

**Academic Editor:**Alexander Domoshnitsky

#### Abstract

The dynamic behaviors of a nonautonomous system for migratory birds with Hassell-Varley type functional response and the saturation incidence rate are studied. Under quite weak assumptions, some sufficient conditions are obtained for the permanence and extinction of the disease. Moreover, the global attractivity of the model is discussed by constructing a Lyapunov function. Numerical simulations which support our theoretical analysis are also given.

#### 1. Introduction

In the natural world, no species can survive alone. While species spread the disease, compete with the other species for space or food, or are predated by other species, predator-prey relationship can be important in regulating the number of preys and predators. And the dynamic relationship between predators and their preys has long been and will continue to be one of the dominant themes in both ecology and mathematical ecology due to its universal existence and importance [1]. Since the pioneering work of Hadeler and Freedman (1989) of describing a predator-prey model, where the prey is infected by a parasite and in turn infects the predator with the parasite [2], more and more mathematical models for predator-prey behavior are carried out in the following decades; see [3â€“7] and the references cited therein.

Migratory birds play an important role in the outburst of a new disease and the reintroduction of a disease to a place that was totally washed away from that place on various cases of infectious diseases [8]. For example, the epidemic of Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis (EEE) which broke in Jamaica in 1962 was suspected to result from transportation of the virus by birds from the continental United States [9, 10]. As another example, the West Nile Virus was introduced to the Middle East by migrating white storks. Therefore, to control and eradicate infectious diseases spread by the migratory birds has been the key issue in the world as well as in the study of mathematical epidemiology [11].

When investigating biological phenomena, there are many factors which affect dynamical properties of biological and mathematical models. One of the familiar nonlinear factors is functional response. There are many significant functional responses in order to model various different situations. As to predator-prey model, the phenomenon that predators have to share or compete for food is common. Therefore, most of the functional responses, which are assumed to depend on the prey numbers only in most models, are not realistic in the real situation and the predators functional response (i.e., the rate of prey consumption by an average predator) is one of the significant elements which have influence on the relationship between predator and prey [12, 13]. The three classical predator-dependent functions are Crowley-Martin type [14], Beddington-DeAngelis type by Beddington [15] and DeAngelis et al. [16], and Hassell-Varley type [17]. A general predator-prey model with Hassell-Varley type functional response may take the following form: where is called Hassell-Varley constant. In a typical predator-prey interaction, where predators do not form groups, one can assume that , producing the so-called ratio-dependent predator-prey dynamics. For terrestrial predators that form a fixed number of tight groups, it is often reasonable to assume that . For aquatic predators that form a fixed number of tights groups, may be more appropriate [18]. There are a lot of excellent works on predator-prey models with Hassell-Varley type functional response; for example, see [19â€“22] and the references therein.

Motivated by these factors, a new nonautonomous predator-prey model with Hassell-Varley type functional response and the saturation incidence rate is proposed to give a more appropriate result and better understanding of the role of migratory birds in pathophoresis. Moreover, under quite weak assumptions, sufficient conditions for the permanence and extinction of the disease are established. In addition, the existence of globally attractive periodic solutions of the system is proposed by discussion and numerical simulation.

The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In the next section, we will introduce the new model. In Section 3, some useful lemmas for one-dimensional nonautonomous equation are proposed. And we establish the sufficient conditions on the permanence and extinction of the disease. Also, by constructing a Lyapunov function, we obtain the global attractivity of the model. Moreover, as applications of the main results, some corollaries are introduced. Particularly, the periodic model is discussed. In Section 4, numerical simulations that verify our qualitative results and a discussion which is about the new model (2) are given. The paper ends with a conclusion.

#### 2. The Basic Mathematical Model

In this paper, we propose a predator-prey system, where the predator population is assumed to be present in the system and the prey population migrates into the system. Before we introduce the model, we would like to present a brief sketch of the construction of the model. This may indicate the biological relevance of it.

In the diseases like WNV and avian influenza, it was found that direct transmission in the bird-to-bird transmission of diseases is possible and birds get recovered from the disease, but the duration and variability of immunity among the WNV survivor are essentially unknown [5]; thus, it is reasonable to assume that all the recruitment in the bird population is in the susceptible class and the infective prey population is generated through infective of susceptible prey . Also, as time passes, some of the prey population is recovered from the disease at a rate of and goes to the susceptible class. Furthermore, is the saturation incidence, where and measure the force of infective (contact rate) and the force of the inhibition effect at time , respectively.

In the absence of the prey, it is assumed that there exists some alternative food source for the growth of the predator population. The predators eat the susceptible and infected prey with Hassell-Varley type functional response. The growth rate of the predator population is assumed to be at time . As after the predation of the infective prey, either the infected predators die immediately and thus are removed from the system, or they are dead-end host of the disease like mammals (such as cats) in the case of WNV and in the transmission of many diseases from the migratory birds to their predators, such as highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus (H5N1) [23, 24]. Then we assume that the disease is only spread among the prey population and the disease is not genetically inherited and also the predator becomes infected but the infection does not spread in the predator population.

The above considerations motivate us to introduce the nonautonomous model for the study of the migrating birds under the framework of the following set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations: where denotes the instantaneous recruitment rate of the prey population at time . denotes the natural death rate of the susceptible prey population and is the death rate of the infective prey population, which includes the natural death rate and the death rate from the disease, at time . Obviously, for all . is half-saturation coefficient at time and is called a Hassell-Varley constant. And, (resp., ) is the maximum value of the per capita rate of (resp., ) due to at time and , have the similar meaning to , . The predators eat both healthy and infected preys at different rates, since the healthy prey more likely escapes from an attack, thus .

The initial conditions are Obviously, the set is a positively invariant set of system (2).

In this paper, let denote all continuous functions on the real line. Given , we denote If is -periodic, then the average value of on a time interval can be defined as

#### 3. Main Results

In this section, we consider the permanence and extinction of the infective prey. Moreover, by constructing a Lyapunov function and using the comparison theorem, the global attractivity of the model (2) is discussed under two cases; that is, the mutual interference constant is a rational number and a real-valued number in interval , respectively.

Firstly, for system (2), we make the following assumptions:(H1)functions , , , , , , , , , and are all nonnegative, continuous, and bounded on ;(H2)there exist positive constants such that

For the permanence of the system (2), we have the following theorems.

Theorem 1. *Suppose that assumptions (H1) and (H2) hold and there is a constant such that
**
where the constant is the upper bound of the prey population. Then the prey population and the predator population are permanent.*

*Proof. *Let be any positive solution of system (2) with initial conditions (3). From the first and second equation of (2), we have
By Lemma 2.1 (see [25]) and the comparison theorem in differential equations, there exist constants and , such that

From the third equation of system (2), we further have
for all . By assumption (H2), conclusion (a) of Lemma 1 (see [26]), and the comparison theorem, there exist constants and , such that
Therefore, all solutions of system (2) with initial conditions (3) are ultimately bounded.

On the other hand, from the first and second equations of (2), we get
By Lemmaâ€‰â€‰2.1 in [25] and the comparison theorem, there are constants and , such that
Further, from the third equation of system (2),
According to the comparison theorem, condition (7), and conclusion (a) of Lemma 1 (see [26]), there exist constants and such that

Therefore, from (9)â€“(15), we obtain that
The proof is completed.

*Remark 2. *Suppose that assumptions (H1) and (H2) hold for system (2), and , , then we can choose the constants given in the above theorem as follows:

Let be some fixed solution of system
and is a fixed solution of the following nonautonomous Logistic equation:
where . Then we have the following theorem.

Theorem 3. *Suppose that assumptions (H1) and (H2) hold. If there is a constant , such that
**
then the infective prey is permanent.*

*Proof. *Let be any solution of system (2). From (9)â€“(20), we can choose sufficiently small , ; then there exists such that
for all .

Firstly, we will prove that there exists a positive constant such that
Construct an auxiliary equation
By Lemma 4 (see [27]), for the given constants and , there exist positive constants , , such that for any and , when , we have
where is the solution of (24) with initial value .

Choose a constant ; we suppose that (23) is not true; then there exists a such that, for the positive solution of (2) with initial condition , we have
So there is a constant such that
for all . Hence, from the first equation of system (2), we have
Let be the solution of (24) with the condition . In view of comparison theorem, we obtain
Therefore, from (25), we get

From the third equation of system (2), we have
for the given constants , by comparison theorem, we obtain

Therefore, from the second equation of system (2), we further have
where , so
Therefore (21) implies that . This is a contradiction. Hence, (23) is true.

Thus, for any we claim that it is impossible that . From this claim, we will only have to discuss the following possibilities. (i)There exists , such that for all .(ii) oscillates about for all large .

Obviously, we only need to consider case (ii). In the following, we will prove for sufficiently large , where
Let be sufficiently large times satisfying
If , then from the second equation of system (2)
If , being similar to the proof in (30), (32), we know that

For any , if , from the above discussion, we obtain that
If , letting be a nonnegative integer such that , then from (21), (37), and (38) we have
Therefore, we have
The proof is completed.

Nextly, we will discuss the extinction of infective and obtain the following result.

Theorem 4. *Suppose that assumptions (H1) and (H2) hold. If there are constants , such that*(H3)*(H4)**where is some fixed solution of system
**
and is a fixed solution of the following nonautonomous Logistic equation:
**
then the infective prey is extinct.*

*Proof. *From assumption (H3), we can choose small enough and big enough satisfying

For any , we set . If (H4) holds, then there exist and such that
for all . Choose an integer satisfying . Set ; then

Differentiating along a solution of system (2), by the comparison theorem and Lemma 2.1 (b) (see [25]), there exists a constant such that
Further, from the third equation of system (2) and Lemma 1 (b) (see [26]), there is a such that

Let , ; then, for all , we have
If , then let be a nonnegative integer such that ; integrating (51) from to , we obtain
Then it follows that as . This is a contradiction with . Hence there must be a such that .

Finally, we will prove
for all . If it is not true, there exists a such that . Hence, there exists a such that and for all . Let be a nonnegative integer such that ; then integrating (51) from to , we obtain
This leads to a contradiction. Hence, inequality (53) holds. Furthermore, since can be arbitrarily small, we conclude that , as . The proof is completed.

In particular, when system (2) degenerates into an -periodic system, then assumptions (H1), (H2), and (H3) are equivalent to the following forms:(C1)functions , , , , , , , , , and are all nonnegative, continuous periodic functions with a period ;(C2), , , ;(C3).

As consequences of Theorems 3 and 4, we have the following corollaries.

Corollary 5. *Suppose that assumptions (C1) and (C2) hold, and
**
then the infective of system (2) is permanent.*

Corollary 6. *Suppose that assumptions (C1), (C2), and (C3) hold, and
**
then the infective of system (2) is extinct.*

Lastly, we will give the discussion on the global attractivity of model (2) as follows:

Theorem 7. *Suppose that assumptions (H1) and (H2) hold and is a rational number. If there are constants such that and , where
**
and , are the constants obtained in Theorem 1, then model (2) is globally attractive.*

*Proof. *Let ; then system (2) is equivalent to the following system:

Let , be any two solutions of system (58). Then, from (9)â€“(13), we have
Construct a Lyapunov function
Thus

Note that is a rational number, which yields that there exist two mutually prime numbers and with and , such that
Then, we can obtain that

Since and , there exist constants and such that for all . Furthermore, we obtain that
for all . Taking integral on both sides of (64) from to , then