Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 150649, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/150649
Research Article

Evaluation of the Effect of Fixation Angle between Polyaxial Pedicle Screw Head and Rod on the Failure of Screw-Rod Connection

1Department of Orthopaedics, International Hospital, Yeşilköy, 34149 İstanbul, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, 06560 Ankara, Turkey
3Ankara Spine Center, Kavaklıdere, 06700 Ankara, Turkey

Received 22 July 2014; Accepted 6 February 2015

Academic Editor: Zhongmin Jin

Copyright © 2015 Engin Çetin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. S. Rose, L. G. Lenke, K. H. Bridwell et al., “Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 852–857, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. J. Kim, L. G. Lenke, S. K. Cho, K. H. Bridwell, B. Sides, and K. Blanke, “Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 2040–2048, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. J. Kim, L. G. Lenke, J. Kim et al., “Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 291–298, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. S. Bess, L. G. Lenke, K. H. Bridwell, G. Cheh, S. Mandel, and B. Sides, “Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity,” Spine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 555–561, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. C. McAfee, D. J. Weiland, and J. J. Carlow, “Survivorship analysis of pedicle spinal instrumentation,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 16, no. 8, supplement, pp. 422–427, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. E. Lonstein, F. Denis, J. H. Perra, M. R. Pinto, M. D. Smith, and R. B. Winter, “Complications associated with pedicle screws,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1519–1528, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. J. DeWald and T. Stanley, “Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65: surgical considerations and treatment options in patients with poor bone quality,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 19, supplement, pp. S144–S151, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. Cho, A. L. Shimer, and F. H. Shen, “Complications associated with posterior lumbar surgery,” Seminars in Spine Surgery, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 101–113, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. M. Kebaish, “Sacropelvic fixation: techniques and complications,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 25, pp. 2245–2251, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. A. Faraj and J. K. Webb, “Early complications of spinal pedicle screw,” European Spine Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 324–326, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Katonis, J. Christoforakis, A. C. Aligizakis, C. Papadopoulos, G. Sapkas, and A. Hadjipavlou, “Complications and problems related to pedicle screw fixation of the spine,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 411, pp. 86–94, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. I. Esses, B. L. Sachs, V. Dreyzin, and T. Zdeblick, “Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation: a selected survey of ABS members,” Spine, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 2231–2239, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Okuyama, K. Sato, E. Abe, H. Inaba, Y. Shimada, and H. Murai, “Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine: an in vitro study of the mechanical stability,” Spine, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 2240–2245, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Soshi, R. Shiba, H. Kondo, and K. Murota, “An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine,” Spine, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1335–1341, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Yamagata, H. Kitahara, S. Minami et al., “Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fixation systems for the lumbar spine,” Spine, vol. 17, no. 3, supplement, pp. S51–S54, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. L. Halvorson, L. A. Kelley, K. A. Thomas, T. S. Whitecloud III, and S. D. Cook, “Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation,” Spine, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 2415–2420, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. N. Weinstein, B. L. Rydevik, and W. Rauschning, “Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 284, pp. 34–46, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Hirano, K. Hasegawa, H. E. Takahashi et al., “Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability,” Spine, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 2504–2510, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. B. Abshire, R. F. McLain, A. Valdevit, and H. E. Kambic, “Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out,” The Spine Journal, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 408–414, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. A. Lehman Jr. and T. R. Kuklo, “Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 2072–2077, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C.-C. Hsu, C.-K. Chao, J.-L. Wang, S.-M. Hou, Y.-T. Tsai, and J. Lin, “Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 788–794, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C.-K. Chao, C.-C. Hsu, J.-L. Wang, and J. Lin, “Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 130–138, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Cho, S. K. Cho, and C. Wu, “The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 1061–1065, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y.-Y. Kim, W.-S. Choi, and K.-W. Rhyu, “Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities—an ex vivo biomechanical study,” The Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 164–168, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. C. George, M. H. Krag, C. C. Johnson, M. E. van Hal, L. D. Haugh, and L. J. Grobler, “Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screws: effect on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae,” Spine, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 181–184, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. F. McLain, M. F. Fry, T. A. Moseley, and N. A. Sharkey, “Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. R. Misenhimer, R. D. Peek, L. L. Wiltse, S. L. G. Rothman, and E. H. Widell Jr., “Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size,” Spine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 367–372, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. R. Chapman, R. M. Harrington, K. M. Lee, P. A. Anderson, A. F. Tencer, and D. Kowalski, “Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 391–398, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Demir, N. Camusxcu, and K. Türeyen, “Design and biomechanical testing of pedicle screw for osteoporotic incidents,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 226, no. 3, pp. 256–262, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. O. Yaman, T. Demir, A. K. Arslan et al., “On the pullout strength comparison of various pedicle screw designs on synthetic foams and ovine vertebrae,” Turkish Neurosurgery, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. K. Arslan, T. Demir, M. F. Örmeci, N. Camuşcu, and K. Türeyen, “Postfusion pullout strength comparison of a novel pedicle screw with classical pedicle screws on synthetic foams,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 114–119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. R. Kuklo, B. K. Potter, D. W. Polly Jr., and L. G. Lenke, “Monaxial versus multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 2113–2120, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S.-H. Chen, R. M. Lin, H.-H. Chen, and K.-J. Tsai, “Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 8, article 28, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. S. Lonner, J. D. Auerbach, O. Boachie-Adjei, S. A. Shah, N. Hosogane, and P. O. Newton, “Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fixation for correction?” Spine, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 845–851, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. X. Wang, C.-E. Aubin, D. Crandall, S. Parent, and H. Labelle, “Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine instrumentation.,” Spine, vol. 37, no. 14, pp. E823–835, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. R. Fogel, C. A. Reitman, W. Liu, and S. I. Esses, “Physical characteristics of polyaxial-headed pedicle screws and biomechanical comparison of load with their failure,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 470–473, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. ASTM, “Standard test method for evaluating the static and fatigue properties of interconnection mechanisms and subassemblies used in spinal arthrodesis implants,” ASTM F1798, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar