Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Volume 2016, Article ID 8584735, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8584735
Research Article

Parallel Robot for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exercises

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2School of Mechanical Engineering, Università Degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Received 22 February 2016; Revised 29 July 2016; Accepted 16 August 2016

Academic Editor: Antonio Riveiro

Copyright © 2016 Alireza Rastegarpanah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. L. Feigin, M. H. Forouzanfar, R. Krishnamurthi et al., “Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9913, pp. 245–255, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Veerbeek, E. van Wegen, R. van Peppen et al., “What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e87987, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Tejima, “Rehabilitation robotics: a review,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 551–564, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Zhang, T. C. Davies, and S. Xie, “Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation—a systematic review,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 10, no. 1, article 30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Schmidt, C. Werner, R. Bernhardt, S. Hesse, and J. Krüger, “Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 4, no. 1, article 2, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. H. S. Carr and R. B. Shephard, A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke, W. Heinemann Medical Books, London, UK, 1982.
  7. D. Y. L. Chan, C. C. H. Chan, and D. K. S. Au, “Motor relearning programme for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 191–200, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. C. Bejarano, S. Maggioni, L. De Rijcke, C. A. Cifuentes, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Robot-assisted rehabilitation therapy: recovery mechanisms and their implications for machine design,” in Emerging Therapies in Neurorehabilitation II, pp. 197–223, Springer, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  9. I. Díaz, J. J. Gil, and E. Sánchez, “Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges,” Journal of Robotics, vol. 2011, Article ID 759764, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. E. Deutsch, C. Paserchia, C. Vecchione et al., “Improved gait and elevation speed of individuals post‐stroke after lower extremity training in virtual environments,” Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 185–186, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. Z. Zhou, W. Meng, Q. Ai, Q. Liu, and X. Wu, “Practical velocity tracking control of a parallel robot based on fuzzy adaptive algorithm,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 574896, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Blaya and H. Herr, “Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. F. Boian, J. E. Deutsch, C. S. Lee, G. C. Burdea, and J. Lewis, “Haptic effects for virtual reality-based post-stroke rehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS '03), pp. 247–253, IEEE, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, March 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Girone, G. Burdea, M. Bouzit, V. Popescu, and J. E. Deutsch, “Orthopedic rehabilitation using the ‘Rutgers ankle’ interface,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 70, pp. 89–95, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. E. Deutsch, J. Latonio, G. C. Burdea, and R. Boian, “Post-stroke rehabilitation with the rutgers ankle system: a case study,” Presence, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 416–430, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. E. Deutsch, J. Latonio, G. Burdea, and R. Boian, “Rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries using the Rutgers ankle haptic interface: three case reports,” in Proceedings of the Eurohaptics Conference, pp. 11–16, Birmingham, UK, July 2001.
  17. J. E. Deutsch, J. A. Lewis, and G. Burdea, “Technical and patient performance using a virtual reality-integrated telerehabilitation system: preliminary finding,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. A. Saglia, N. G. Tsagarakis, J. S. Dai, and D. G. Caldwell, “A high performance 2-dof over-actuated parallel mechanism for ankle rehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '09), pp. 2180–2186, May 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. A. Saglia, N. G. Tsagarakis, J. S. Dai, and D. G. Caldwell, “Control strategies for ankle rehabilitation using a high performance ankle exerciser,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '10), pp. 2221–2227, IEEE, 2010.
  20. J. A. Saglia, N. G. Tsagarakis, J. S. Dai, and D. G. Caldwell, “Inverse-kinematics-based control of a redundantly actuated platform for rehabilitation,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Liu, J. Gao, H. Yue, X. Zhang, and G. Lu, “Design and kinematics simulation of parallel robots for ankle rehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA '06), pp. 1109–1113, IEEE, Luoyang, China, June 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Liu, J. Gao, H. Yue, X. Zhang, and G. Lu, “Design and kinematics analysis of parallel robots for ankle rehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '06), pp. 253–258, Beijing, China, October 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. S. Calabrò, A. Cacciola, F. Bertè et al., “Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now?” Neurological Sciences, vol. 37, article 503, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, J. L. Emken, and S. C. Cramer, “Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 497–525, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Akdoğan and M. A. Adli, “The design and control of a therapeutic exercise robot for lower limb rehabilitation: physiotherabot,” Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 509–522, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. M. Clarkson, Musculoskeletal Assessment: Joint Range of Motion and Manual Muscle Strength, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2000.
  27. J. L. Emken, J. H. Wynne, S. J. Harkema, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “A robotic device for manipulating human stepping,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 185–189, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Rakhodaei, M. Saadat, and A. Rastegarpanah, “Motion simulation of a hybrid parallel robot for ankle rehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the ASME 12th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, pp. V003T17A008, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. H. Rakhodaei, M. Saadat, A. Rastegarpanah, and C. Z. Abdullah, “Path planning of the hybrid parallel robot for ankle rehabilitation,” Robotica, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 173–184, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Girone, G. Burdea, and M. Bouzit, “The Rutgers Ankle orthopedic rehabilitation interface,” in Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, vol. 67, pp. 305–312, 1999.
  31. I. Pastor, H. A. Hayes, and S. J. Bamberg, “A feasibility study of an upper limb rehabilitation system using kinect and computer games,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '12), pp. 1286–1289, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. H. Jost, “Kinect-based approach to upper limb rehabilitation,” in Modern Stroke Rehabilitation through e-Health-Based Entertainment, E. Vogiatzaki and A. Krukowski, Eds., pp. 169–193, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Kairy, M. Veras, P. Archambault et al., “Maximizing post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation using a novel telerehabilitation interactive virtual reality system in the patient's home: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial,” Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 47, pp. 49–53, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Dutta, “Evaluation of the Kinect sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 645–649, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. Galna, G. Barry, D. Jackson, D. Mhiripiri, P. Olivier, and L. Rochester, “Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease,” Gait & Posture, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1062–1068, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. E. Stone and M. Skubic, “Passive in-home measurement of stride-to-stride gait variability comparing vision and Kinect sensing,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '11), pp. 6491–6494, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Foxcroft, Tracking a Parallel Robot Using Coloured Markers, Microsoft Kinect and the Kinect Colour Block Application, Internal Communication, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, 2013.
  38. K. Liu, J. M. Fitzgerald, and F. L. Lewis, “Kinematics analysis of a Stewart platform manipulator,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 282–293, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. Dasgupta and T. S. Mruthyunjaya, “A Newton-Euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the Stewart platform manipulator,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1135–1152, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Dasgupta and T. S. Mruthyunjaya, “Singularity-free path planning for the Stewart platform manipulator,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 711–725, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. F. Alhwarin, A. Ferrein, and I. Scholl, “IR stereo kinect: improving depth images by combining structured light with IR stereo,” in PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, D.-N. Pham and S.-B. Park, Eds., vol. 8862 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 409–421, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. J. Hernández-López, A. Quintanilla-Olvera, J. López-Ramírez, F. Rangel-Butanda, M. Ibarra-Manzano, and D. Almanza-Ojeda, “Detecting objects using color and depth segmentation with Kinect sensor,” Procedia Technology, vol. 3, pp. 196–204, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar