Research Article
Ankle-Foot Orthosis Made by 3D Printing Technique and Automated Design Software
Table 1
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) after application of 3D-printed and conventional ankle-foot orthosis.
| Item | 3D-printed AFO | Conventional AFO | Score | Comment | Score | Comment |
| (1) Dimensions | 4 | Need to support the anterior part of the foot | 4 | Difficult to wear due to size | (2) Weight | 5 | | 3 | Heavy to wear | (3) Adjustment | 4 | Slight difficult to tie shoe laces | 5 | | (4) Safety | 5 | | 5 | | (5) Durability | 5 | | 5 | | (6) Easy to use | 5 | | 2 | Difficult to wear due to thickness | (7) Comfort | 4 | Mild unstable feeling | 4 | Uncomfortable due to hardness | (8) Effectiveness | 4 | Mild foot drop during the swing phase | 5 | | Total satisfaction | 4.5 | | 4.1 | | Most important 3 items | | (1) Weight, (2) dimension, and (3) safety | | |
|
|