Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Bioinformatics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 278385, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/278385
Research Article

AUTO-MUTE 2.0: A Portable Framework with Enhanced Capabilities for Predicting Protein Functional Consequences upon Mutation

Laboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110, USA

Received 11 June 2014; Revised 29 July 2014; Accepted 29 July 2014; Published 17 August 2014

Academic Editor: Gilbert Deleage

Copyright © 2014 Majid Masso and Iosif I. Vaisman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. A. Adzhubei, S. Schmidt, L. Peshkin et al., “A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations,” Nature Methods, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 248–249, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Bromberg and B. Rost, “SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3823–3835, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Capriotti, P. Fariselli, and R. Casadio, “I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. W306–W310, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Dehouck, A. Grosfils, B. Folch, D. Gilis, P. Bogaerts, and M. Rooman, “Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 2537–2543, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Kumar, S. Henikoff, and P. C. Ng, “Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm,” Nature Protocols, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1073–1082, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Bromberg, G. Yachdav, Y. Ofran, R. Schneider, and B. Rost, “New in protein structure and function annotation: hotspots, single nucleotide polymorphisms and the “Deep Web”,” Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 408–419, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Masso and I. I. Vaisman, “Accurate prediction of stability changes in protein mutants by combining machine learning with structure based computational mutagenesis,” Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 2002–2009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Masso and I. I. Vaisman, “AUTO-MUTE: Web-based tools for predicting stability changes in proteins due to single amino acid replacements,” Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 683–687, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Frank, M. Hall, L. Trigg, G. Holmes, and I. H. Witten, “Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka,” Bioinformatics, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 2479–2481, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. B. Barber, D. P. Dobkin, and H. Huhdanpaa, “The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls,” Association for Computing Machinery: Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 469–483, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng et al., “The protein data bank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. de Berg, O. Cheong, and M. van Kreveld, Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  13. M. J. Sippl, “Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures.,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 473–501, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Masso and I. I. Vaisman, “Structure-based machine learning models for computational mutagenesis,” in Introduction to Protein Structure Prediction: Methods and Algorithms, H. Rangwala and G. Karypis, Eds., pp. 403–430, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Masso and I. I. Vaisman, “Knowledge-based computational mutagenesis for predicting the disease potential of human non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 266, no. 4, pp. 560–568, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. M. Masso and I. I. Vaisman, “Structure-based prediction of protein activity changes: assessing the impact of single residue replacements,” in Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Annual International Conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3221–3224, IEEE, 2011.