Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment

<table>Comparison of pushover analyses in <i>x</i> direction of the
building in Figure <a href="../fig3/">3</a>(a) nonseismically designed (b) <svg height="11.1" id="M65" style="vertical-align:-0.17555pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 53.349998 11.1" width="53.349998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,11.1)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.12)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.35)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑐</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="8.6520758" y="0">=</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="20.692465" y="0">1</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="26.943966" y="0">2</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="33.195465" y="0">.</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="36.321217" y="0">5</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>%. </table>

Advances in Civil Engineering

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment 