Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment

<table>Comparison of pushover analyses for seismically
designed building (a) <svg height="9.6750002" id="M68" style="vertical-align:-2.29482pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 9.6374998 9.6750002" width="9.6374998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,9.675)">
<g transform="translate(72,-64.26)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,66.6)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝜇</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>% (b) <svg height="9.6750002" id="M69" style="vertical-align:-2.29482pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 9.6374998 9.6750002" width="9.6374998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,9.675)">
<g transform="translate(72,-64.26)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,66.6)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝜇</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>%. </table>

Advances in Civil Engineering

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment 