Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Civil Engineering
Volume 2009, Article ID 429169, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/429169
Research Article

Collapse Scenarios of High-Rise Buildings Using Plastic Limit Analysis

1Singapore-MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore 117576
2Civil Engineering College, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
3Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

Received 21 August 2008; Revised 23 January 2009; Accepted 15 May 2009

Academic Editor: Ser Quek

Copyright © 2009 G. Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. R. Asker, “Washington outlook,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, p. 33, September 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. K. Chow and W. Y. Hung, “Possible collapse scenarios of the World Trade Center twin towers,” Asian Fire Fighting & Security Journal, pp. 24–37, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  3. World Trade Center Building Performance Study, Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA, 2002.
  4. J. G. Quintiere, M. di Marzo, and R. Becker, “A suggested cause of the fire-induced collapse of the World Trade Towers,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 707–716, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. W. K. Chow, “Speech on ‘Essential fire safety provision for highrise buildings in Hong Kong: lessons learnt from World Trade Centre incident’,” Hong Kong Institute of Construction Managers, Hong Kong, January 2002.
  6. W. G. Corley, “Lessons learned on improving resistance of buildings to terrorist attacks,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 68–78, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. G. Rehm, W. M. Pitts, H. R. Baum et al., “Initial model for fires in the World Trade Center Towers,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, D. D. Evans, Ed., pp. 25–40, International Association for Fire Safety Science (IAFSS), Boston, Mass, USA, June 2003.
  8. J. Milke, “Study of building performance in the WTC disaster,” Fire Protection Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 6–16, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. G. Quintiere, “Opportunities to learn from 9/11,” Fire Protection Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 27–30, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. G. Quintiere, “Review of NIST WTC investigation,” Skyscraper Safety Campaign, pp. 17–31, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. “Latest findings from NIST World Trade Center investigation released. Leading collapse sequence for each WTC tower defined,” NIST and the World Trade Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  12. Documentary information received by NIST, News and Events, NIST and the World Trade Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  13. Project 2—Baseline structural performance and aircraft impact damage analysis,” Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster, NIST and the World Trade Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  14. Project 6—Structural Fire Response and Collapse Analysis,” Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster, NIST and the World Trade Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  15. “Key findings of NIST's June 2004 progress report on the federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster,” Tech. Rep., NIST and the World Trade Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  16. W. Y. Hung and W. K. Chow, “Possible collapse scenarios of World Trade Center twin towers,” in Proceedings of the Subgroup 4: “Smoke Movement and Toxic Harmful Gases Transfer in Fire” of the National 973 Project “Fire Dynamics and Fundamentals of Fire Safety”, pp. 16–24, Hefei, China, May 2004.
  17. “Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers,” Final Report. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster, National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Construction Safety Team, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, September 2005.
  18. Z. P. Bažant and Y. Zhou, “Why did the world trade center collapse? Simple analysis,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 2–6, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. Z. P. Bažant and M. Verdure, “Mechanics of progressive collapse: learning from World Trade Center and building demolitions,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 308–319, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Roberts, “After the towers—the future for tall buildings. Designing against disaster,” Ingenia, vol. 17, pp. 7–9, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  21. “Behaviour of steel framed structures under fire conditions,” Tech. Rep., DETRPIT Project, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, 2000, http://www.civ.ed.ac.uk/research/fire/public_html/Cardington/SM3.pdf.
  22. A. S. Usmani, J. M. Rotter, S. Lamont, A. M. Sanad, and M. Gillie, “Fundamental principles of structural behaviour under thermal effects,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 721–744, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. S. Usmani, Y. C. Chung, and J. L. Torero, “How did the WTC towers collapse: a new theory,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 501–533, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. G. Hodge, Plastic Analysis of Structure, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1966.
  25. W. Cheng and J. K. Wu, “Collapse process of World Trade Tower from the viewpoint of explosion mechanics,” Mechanics in Engineering, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 73–75, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. W. Liu, “The mechanics study for the collapse of the World Trade Tower,” Science Technology and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1671–1815, 2005. View at Google Scholar