Research Article
Enhancing the Classical Closed-Loop Algorithm in terms of Power Consumption
Table 2
Structural peak response of the controlled building during the El-Centro earthquake excitation.
| | Case | Top story Dis. (cm) | Top story Vel. (m/s) | Top story Acc. (m/s2) | RMS of Dis. (cm) | RMS of Vel. (m/s) | RMS of Acc. (m/s2) | Max. Co.f. (KN) | Ave. Co.f. (KN) | Max. B. shear (KN) | RMS of drifts (cm) |
| | No control | 19.3 | 1.06 | 7.9 | 39.16 | 2.23 | 15.68 | — | — | 11.07 | 7.34 | | Passive control | 15.2 | 0.89 | 6.4 | 31.09 | 1.84 | 13.13 | — | — | 9.24 | 5.87 | | CCLQR | 6.70 | 0.63 | 3.60 | 13.74 | 1.41 | 8.92 | 1082.82 | 119.84 | 4.08 | 2.74 | | NLQR-α1 | 8.90 | 0.68 | 4.60 | 18.34 | 1.52 | 10.09 | 763.15 | 83.25 | 5.49 | 3.42 | | NLQR-α2 | 7.80 | 0.68 | 4.40 | 16.10 | 1.49 | 9.40 | 739.79 | 99.17 | 4.86 | 3.12 | | NLQR-α3 | 6.80 | 0.63 | 4.10 | 14.07 | 1.44 | 9.25 | 1069.47 | 86.00 | 4.17 | 2.77 |
|
|
