Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Civil Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 1548319, 29 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1548319
Research Article

Hysteresis and Soil Site Dependent Input and Hysteretic Energy Spectra for Far-Source Ground Motions

1Michael Baker International, Hamilton, NJ 08619, USA
2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1240, USA

Received 30 June 2016; Revised 14 September 2016; Accepted 26 September 2016

Academic Editor: Lucio Nobile

Copyright © 2016 Mebrahtom Gebrekirstos Mezgebo and Eric M. Lui. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. S. H. Smith and W. K. Tso, “Inconsistency of force-based design procedure,” Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. J. N. Priestley, G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky, Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 2007.
  3. FEMA 440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  4. E. Hernandez-Montes, O.-S. Kwon, and M. A. Aschheim, “An energy-based foftimulatzon for firstand Multiplemode nonlinear static (pushover) analyses,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–88, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Manoukas, A. Athanatopoulou, and I. Avramidis, “Static pushover analysis based on an energy-equivalent SDOF system,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Hernández-Montes, M. A. Aschheim, and L. M. Gil-Martín, “Energy components in nonlinear dynamic response of SDOF systems,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 933–945, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. M. Bruneau and N. Wang, “Some aspects of energy methods for the inelastic seismic response of ductile SDOF structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Fabrizio, S. Bruno, L. Decanini, and R. Saragoni, “Correlations between energy and displacement demands for performance-based seismic engineering,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 168, no. 1-2, pp. 237–259, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. W. Housner, “Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes,” in Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 1–13, Berkeley, Calif, USA, June 1956.
  10. H. Akiyama, Earthquake-Resistant Limit State Design for Buildings, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan, 1985.
  11. H. Kuwamura and T. V. Galambos, “Earthquake load for structural reliability,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 1446–1462, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Fajfar, T. Vidic, and M. Fischinger, “Seismic demand in medium- and long-period structures,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1133–1144, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. D. Trifunac and A. G. Brady, “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion,” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, vol. 65, pp. 581–626, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  14. C.-M. Uang and V. V. Bertero, “Evaluation of seismic energy in structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Manfredi, “Evaluation of seismic energy demand,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 485–499, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Khashaee, Energy-based seismic design and damage assessment for structures [Ph.D. thesis], Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex, USA, 2004.
  17. Y.-J. Park and A. H.-S. Ang, “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 722–739, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. D. Decanini and F. Mollaioli, “Formulation of elastic earthquake input energy spectra,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1503–1522, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Benavent-Climent, L. G. Pujades, and F. López-Almansa, “Design energy input spectra for moderate-seismicity regions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1151–1172, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Benavent-Climent, F. López-Almansa, and D. A. Bravo-González, “Design energy input spectra for moderate-to-high seismicity regions based on Colombian earthquakes,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1129–1148, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. G. Amiri, G. A. Darzi, and J. V. Amiri, “Design elastic input energy spectra based on Iranian earthquakes,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 635–646, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. López-Almansa, A. U. Yazgan, and A. Benavent-Climent, “Design energy input spectra for high seismicity regions based on Turkish registers,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 885–912, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Cheng, A. Lucchini, and F. Mollaioli, “Proposal of new ground-motion prediction equations for elastic input energy spectra,” Earthquake and Structures, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 485–510, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Cheng, A. Lucchini, and F. Mollaioli, “Correlation of elastic input energy equivalent velocity spectral values,” Earthquake and Structures, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 957–976, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. ASCE/SEI 7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va, USA, 2010.
  26. P. Fajfar and T. Vidic, “Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 523–537, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. F. Hall, T. H. Heaton, M. W. Halling, and D. J. Wald, “Near‐source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 569–605, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. K. W. Campbell, “Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra,” Seismological Research Letters, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 154–179, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Bazzurro and N. Luco, “Damage potential of near-source ground motion records,” in Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 5061–5070, San Francisco, Calif, USA, April 2006. View at Scopus
  30. N. Abrahamson and W. Silva, “Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 67–97, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, “NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 139–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. M. Boore and G. M. Atkinson, “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 99–138, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. S.-J. Chiou and R. R. Youngs, “An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 173–215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. C. Kunde and R. S. Jangid, “Seismic behavior of isolated bridges—a state-of-the-art review,” Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 140–170, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  35. IBC, International Building Code, International Code Council, Country Clubs Hill, Ill, USA, 2015.
  36. AASHTO, Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  37. B.-F. Peng and J. P. Conte, “Statistical insight into constant-ductility design using a non-stationary earthquake ground motion model,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 895–916, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Inel, M. A. Aschheim, and D. P. Abrams, “An algorithm for computing isoductile response spectra,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 375–390, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Zhai and L. Xie, “Constant-ductility strength demand spectra for seismic design of structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, vol. 4, no. 2, Article ID 1671-3664(2005)02-0243-08, pp. 243–250, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. K. Chopra and R. K. Goel, “Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 637–655, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. A. Mahin and V. V. Bertero, “Nonlinear seismic response of a coupled wall system,” Journal of the Structural Division, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1759–1780, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. M. Ricles, R. Sause, M. M. Garlock, and C. Zhao, “Posttensioned seismic-resistant connections for steel frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Christopoulos, A. Filiatrault, and B. Folz, “Seismic response of self-centering hysteretic SDOF systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1131–1150, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. F. C. Filippou, E. P. Popov, and V. V. Bertero, “Modeling of R/C joints under cyclic excitations,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 2666–2684, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Nakashima, K. Saburi, and B. Tsuji, “Energy input and dissipation behaviour of structures with hysteretic dampers,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 483–496, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. EPRC, “A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake,” EPRC Report 2848-16, Electric Power Research Corporation, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  47. A. Arias, A Measure of the Earthquake Intensity in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1970.
  48. M. Power, B. Chiou, N. Abrahamson, Y. Bozorgnia, T. Shantz, and C. Roblee, “An overview of the NGA project,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, “A ground motion prediction equation for the horizontal component of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) based on the PEER-NGA strong motion database,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 635–650, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. B. A. Bradley, “Empirical correlations between cumulative absolute velocity and amplitude-based ground motion intensity measures,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 37–54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. BISPEC, “Earthquake Solutions,” 2012, http://www.eqsols.com.
  52. FEMA P695, Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  53. PEER, “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Beta version Data Base,” http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database.
  54. L. Ye, G. Cheng, and X. Qu, “Study on energy based seismic design method and the application for steel braced frame structures,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, pp. 417–428, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 2009.
  55. F. Mollaioli, S. Bruno, L. D. Decanini, and G. F. Panza, “Characterization of the dynamic response of structures to damaging pulse-type near-fault ground motions,” Meccanica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23–46, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus