Research Article  Open Access
Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of LongSpan CableStayed Bridges Using CFRP Cables
Abstract
The elastic modulus and deadweight of carbon fiberreinforced polymer (CFRP) cables are different from those of steel cables. Thus, the static and dynamic behaviors of cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables are different from those of cablestayed bridges using steel cables. The static and dynamic performances of the two kinds of bridges with a span of 1000 m were studied using the numerical method. The effects of geometric nonlinear factors on static performance of the two kinds of cablestayed bridges were analyzed. The live load effects and temperature effects of the two cablestayed bridges were also analyzed. The influences of design parameters, including different structural systems, the numbers of auxiliary piers, and the space arrangement types of cable, on the dynamic performance of the cablestayed bridge using CFRP cables were also studied. Results demonstrate that sag effect of the CFRP cable is much smaller than that of steel cable. The temperature effects of CFRP cablestayed bridge are less than those of steel cablestayed bridge. The vertical bending natural vibration frequency of the CFRP cablestayed bridge is generally lower than that of steel cablestayed bridge, whereas the torsional natural vibration frequency of the former is higher than that of the latter.
1. Introduction
Given their large spanning ability, elegant appearance, and good aerodynamic stability, cablestayed bridges have experienced a prosperous development in the last 30 years and are still regarded as the first choice to cross rivers, valleys, and even straits. However, traditional steel cables are prone to corrosion and fatigue, which would cause premature failure of the cable. In addition, the substantial weight of steel cables results in a pronounced sag effect, thereby decreasing the effective stiffness of the cable in a superspan cablestayed bridge. Carbon fiberreinforced polymers (CFRP) possess many advantages, including light weight, high tensile strength, and excellent corrosion and fatigue resistance. These properties of CFRP make them very attractive in superspan cablestayed bridges. In fact, as early as 1987, U. Meier and H. Meier (e.g., [1–3]) evaluated the feasibility of building a CFRP cablestayed bridge. Hence, a few cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables have been built for research purposes (e.g., [4–8]). The first cablestayed bridge using CFRP cables constructed in China was the Xishan Pedestrian Bridge at Jiangsu University, which was designed and studied by Southeast University [9].
At present, a few scholars have studied the static and dynamic performances, as well as wind and seismic performances, of cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables. Khalifa et al. [10] proposed the analysis and design aspects of an FRP cablestayed bridge by describing the steps taken in the design of the first US FRP cablestayed pedestrian bridge constructed in Lincoln. The overall behaviors of the whole bridge under static and dynamic loads were analyzed using threedimensional macro models. Adanur and Gunaydin [11, 12] presented a numerical study on the stochastic seismic analysis of a cablestayed bridge subjected to earthquake ground motion using CFRP cables from the prototype of Jindo Bridge. Cheng and Lau [13] studied the dynamic behavior of CFRP cablestayed bridges by substituting CFRP cables for conventional steel cables in Nanpu Bridge. In their study, results showed that the use of CFRP cables had a stiffening effect on the bridge system. Mei and Lu [14] and Xie et al. [15] studied the static and dynamic characteristics of CFRP cables, respectively. Zhang and Ying [16] investigated the aerodynamic stability of cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables. Kou et al. [17] analyzed the static instability of longspan cablestayed bridges with CFRP cables under wind load. Xie et al. [18, 19] explained the static and dynamic characteristics of a longspan cablestayed bridge with CFRP cables. Wang et al. (e.g., [20–22]) investigated a 1000 m scale cablestayed bridge with hybrid FRP cables. Fang et al. [23] studied the behaviors of a superlongspan prestressed cablestayed bridge with CFRP cables and UHPC girder. Xiong et al. [24] studied the design theory of CFRP and steel composite stay cables. Other scholars (e.g., [25–27]) made more comprehensive studies on the possibility of applying CFRP in longspan bridges.
With increasing span of the cablestayed bridge, the geometric nonlinear issues become more and more acute, especially the sag effect of steel cable, which even becomes a control factor of designing the cablestayed bridge. However, very little research on the effects of the geometric nonlinearity on the cablestayed bridge using CFRP cables was conducted. In this study, the cablestayed bridges using CFRP and steel cables, respectively, with the same span arrangement were designed. The effects of geometric nonlinearity on the static performance of two cablestayed bridges were studied. Through comparing the geometric nonlinear effects of the two cablestayed bridges, the advantages and disadvantages of the cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables were explored. Although several scholars studied the dynamic characteristics of cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables before, their research only focused on a special example. In this study, the dynamic characteristics of cablestayed bridges with different design parameters, including structure system, the numbers of auxiliary piers, and arrangement pattern of cables, were studied. Besides, rational design parameters are also optimized, thus providing reference for the design of cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables.
2. Static Performance of the CableStayed Bridge Using CFRP Cables
Two cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables and steel cables, respectively, are preliminarily designed, with a 410 m + 1000 m + 410 m span arrangement, as shown in Figure 1. As shown in Figure 2(a), the steel box girder is adopted in this bridge. According to the analysis, the main girder is strengthened in a certain region besides the pylons, which is shown in Figure 2(b). Inverted “Y” type reinforced concrete pylon is designed to bear the forces transferred from cables. The cross section of the pylon is rectangle and the cross section changes gradually from the bottom to the top of the pylon. Figure 3 displays the layout of the pylon. Inclined double plane fantype cables are adopted in this bridge. The corresponding sectional area of each cable is drawn in Figure 4 and the finishedstage cable forces are shown in Figure 5. Parameters of the main components are presented in Table 1.
 
Note. The transformed unit weight of the girder 109.9 includes the weight of stiffening plate; the transformed unit weight of the steel cable 80 includes the weight of protection material. 
(a) Section of girder A
(b) Section of girder B
As the bridges are not symmetrical about the main pylon, counterbalance weights are set in the intensivecable region and auxiliary piers region. The specific distribution of the counterbalance weights is as follows: In the region of 0~12 m from the end of the girder, the average weight is 230 kN/m; in the region of 12~92 m, the average weight is 330 kN/m; in the region of 92~102 m, the average weight is 280 kN/m; in the region of 102~122 m, the average weight is 180 kN/m.
Usually, two methods are applied to replace steel cables with CFRP cables. They are equalstrength and equalstiffness principles, respectively. In terms of equalstrength principle, the design strength of CFRP is usually greater than that of steel due to its much higher tensile strength, and the safety factor is similar to steel, which results in a much smaller sectional area of the CFRP cable than that of the steel one and decreases the stiffness of the whole bridge. But with equalstiffness principle, larger sectional area of CFRP cable would be required, which is uneconomic. In our paper, a compromise plan for designing the CFRP cable with the same sectional area as the steel cable is adopted. A safety coefficient of 2.5 is selected for steel cables, and then the safety coefficient for CFRP cables is about 3.4 according to the parameters shown in Table 1.
Before discussing the static and dynamic properties of CFRP cablestayed bridges, the material weight and cost of CFRP cables versus steel cables are first investigated. The material dosages for the designed CFRP cablestayed bridge and steel cablestayed bridge in this paper are calculated and listed in Table 2.

Table 2 shows that, for steel cablestayed bridge, the selfweight of the cables accounts for approximately 10% of the total weight of the superstructure. However, the proportion for CFRP cable is just about 2%. With increasing span, this difference will be more and more obvious. Aside from the selfweight of CFRP cable, the relative cost is useful for practical applications. The market prices of imported CFRP cable and steel cable are reported and set to be 25 : 1 per unit weight [21]. As the total weight of CFRP cable in this design is only onefifth of steel cable’s, the total cost of CFRP cable is five times the steel cable’s. Along with the localization and application of CFRP, the price ratio will gradually decline. Considering that the cost of maintenance for CFRP cable in the whole life cycle is much less than that for steel cable, the CFRP cable is applicable in superlong bridge practice.
Cablestayed bridge is a complex structure in which lateral bending and torsion are often coupled together. The entire bridges are modeled by fishbone beam using spatial finite models, by which the girders, pylons, and piers are simulated by threedimensional beam elements and the cables are simulated by link elements. The sectional properties of the girders, pylons, and piers are modeled in terms of equivalent sectional area and moments of inertia. The analysis model is shown in Figure 6.
2.1. Analysis of Geometrical Nonlinear Influences
The influencing factors of geometric nonlinearity can be classified into three types: sag effect, large deformation effect, and beamcolumn effect. Compared with beam bridges, the effects of geometric nonlinearity on the static performance of cablestayed bridges are greater. The effects of geometric nonlinearity on the static performance of cablestayed bridges were studied in this paper. Commonly, the sag effect of a cable is considered by an equivalent elastic modulus , which is provided bywhere is the modulus of elasticity of the cable, is the unit weight of the cable, is the horizontal projection length of the cable, and is the stress of the cable.
The large deformation effect is solved by theoretical formulation of TL or UL methods and the beamcolumn effect is considered by introducing a geometric stiffness matrix.
According to the Chinese Highway Engineering Technique Standard (JTGB012014), the live load (vehicle load) is calculated to be 42 kN/m, with an additional concentrated load of 1440 kN at the midspan.
Analyses were described as follows:
(1) Linear Analysis (L). Any nonlinear factor was not taken into account.
(2) Initial Stress Analysis (IS). Only the geometric stiffness effect produced by cable initial tension was considered, and this effect would be considered in the following analyses.
(3) Sag Effect Analysis (SE). Sag effect was considered, but beamcolumn effect and large deformation effect were ignored.
(4) BeamColumn Effect Analysis (BE). Beamcolumn effect was considered, but sag effect and large deformation effect were ignored.
(5) Large Displacement Effect Analysis (LDE). Large deformation effect was considered, but sag effect and beamcolumn effect were ignored.
(6) Combined Effect Analysis (CE). All nonlinear factors were considered.
According to the six abovementioned situations, the effects of living load arranged at midspan of the two cablestayed bridges are calculated. The results are presented in Table 3.

According to Table 3, the geometric nonlinear effects on the mechanical behavior of two cablestayed bridges are discussed using quantitative analysis as follows (by absolute value).
(1) The Influence of Cable Initial Stress. Comparing the results between L and IS, it is found that displacements and internal forces of the two cablestayed bridges decrease when initial tensions of cables are considered. This is because geometrical stiffness, provided by the initial tension, increases the structural stiffness.
(2) The Influence of Sag Effect. Comparing the results between SE and IS, it is found that displacements and bending moments of the cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables exhibit a little difference, whereas the displacements and bending moments at the midspan of the steel cablestayed bridge increase by 7.5% and 4.4%, respectively, when the sag effect is taken into account, indicating that CFRP cable displays a smaller sag effect than steel cable.
(3) The Influence of BeamColumn Effect. Comparing the results between BE and IS, it is found that displacements and internal forces of the two cablestayed bridges increase by 2% to 6% after considering the beamcolumn effect, demonstrating the significant influence of the beamcolumn effect on both cablestayed bridges.
(4) The Influence of Large Displacement Effect. Comparing the results between LDE and IS, it is found that the bending moments at the bottom of the pylon slightly increase, whereas the structural effects of other parts change a little, indicating that the influence of the large displacement effect is minor under live load.
(5) The Combined Effect Influence. Comparing the results of CE and IS, the nonlinear effect of the steel cablestayed bridge is very significant, whereas most effects of CFRP cablestayed bridge change slightly, except for the axial force of the main girder at the pylon when taking into account all of the geometric nonlinearities.
(6) Comparing the Results of the Two CableStayed Bridges. Comparing the results of the two cablestayed bridges, most structural effects of CFRP cablestayed bridges are greater than those of steel cablestayed bridges, except for the axial force of the main girder at the pylon. This is because the elastic modulus of the CFRP cable is 20% less than that of steel cable, but the former is 8% less than the latter after considering the sag effect. With increasing bridge span, the greater the sag effect, the less the equivalent elastic modulus. Hence, when designing a CFRP cablestayed bridge, the design cable force should be larger than that of steel cablestayed bridge to eliminate the difference and to ensure the serviceability of CFRP cablestayed bridge. Note that the above analysis only considered the vehicle loads completely distributed in the midspan. However, for superlongspan bridges, the vehicle loads only account for a quite small portion of the dead load. Hence, the geometric nonlinear properties under dead load are undoubtedly more obvious than under vehicle loads. For this reason, the geometric nonlinear properties in the construction stages are of great importance and need more attention.
2.2. Analysis of the Live Load Effect of Two CableStayed Bridges
Given the geometry nonlinearity effect, the linear superposition principle is not applicable for longspan cablestayed bridges. Therefore, the traditional influence lineloading algorithm cannot be used for the analysis of live load effect. However, the live load accounts for only 15% of the dead load of superstructures for longspan bridges, so the dead load can be used as its initial state to calculate the live load effect. This method is called the secondorder theory for live load effect calculation.
The CFRP cablestayed bridge was calculated by the secondorder theory analysis and linear analysis methods. Figures 7, 8, and 9 show envelope diagrams of bending moments, axial forces, and deflections of the girder, respectively.
Figures 7–9 show that the results of the linear analysis method are less than those by the secondorder theory analysis method. However, their differences are small because the sag effect of CFRP cablestayed bridge is low, thereby leading to a very small total geometric nonlinear effect.
Figures 7 and 8 also show that the girders’ bending moment of CFRP cablestayed bridge is greater than that of steel cablestayed bridge because equivalent elastic modulus of CFRP cables is less than that of steel cables when the span is within 1000 m. However, girders’ axial forces of the former are less than the latter, as the sag effect of steel cables reduces their obliquity at the beam end, thereby causing an increase in the horizontal component.
2.3. Temperature Effect Analysis of CFRP CableStayed Bridge
The linear expansion coefficient of CFRP is approximately 1/14 of steel. When structures are made of the same material, the smaller the linear expansion coefficient, the smaller the temperature effect. To evaluate the temperature susceptibility of the CFRP cablestayed bridge, the temperature effect of the two cablestayed bridges mentioned before with different structure systems was examined. Restraint stiffness is 12,000 kN/m in the towerbeam elastic restraint system. According to Guidelines for Design of Highway CablesStayed Bridge (JTG/T D65012007), the combination of temperatures is as follows: the temperature of girder rise 20°C + the temperature of pylon rise 15°C + the temperature of cables rise 30°C. Temperature effects of different structural systems are shown in Table 4.

A significant difference can be found by comparing the results of the two cablestayed bridges. The deformations of CFRP cables are small because the linear expansion coefficient value of CFRP is much less than that of steel. Correspondingly, the tension forces increase rather than decrease because of the uncoordinated deformation. Moreover, the deflections of the girder are upward and the bending moments of the girder at the pylon are positive. On the contrary, the elongation of the steel cable is large, resulting in the decrease of cable tension, downward deflection of the girder, and a great negative bending moment at the pylon. To sum up, the girder’s bending moment at the pylon and displacement at midspan of CFRP cablestayed bridge due to temperature are less than those of the steel cablestayed bridge, which is beneficial for the service performance of the whole bridge.
3. Dynamic Characteristics of CFRP CableStayed Bridge
3.1. Dynamic Characteristics of CableStayed Bridge Using Different Kinds of Stay Cables
To analyze the dynamic characteristics of cablestayed bridge using different kinds of stay cables, the bridges with the same span arrangement as that in static analysis were adopted. Using FEM model, the first 16 orders of vibration mode and the corresponding frequency considering or not considering initial stress of the cablestayed bridges are calculated, respectively, and listed in Table 5. The first 20order frequencies of two cablestayed bridges are shown in Figures 10 and 11.

To verify the rationality of the preliminary design of the bridges and the reliability of calculation, the main fundamental frequencies of the two cablestayed bridges with similar main span were listed for comparison. For a cablestayed bridge with span arrangement of 76 m + 100 m + 298 m + 1008 m + 298 m + 100 m + 76 m [23], the fundamental frequencies of lateral bending, vertical bending, and torsional modes are 0.129, 0.201, and 0.547 Hz, respectively. For a cablestayed bridge with a span arrangement of 450 m + 1000 m + 450 m [28], the fundamental frequencies of lateral bending, vertical bending, and torsional modes are 0.1016, 0.1842, and 0.4630 Hz, respectively. These indicate that the design is reasonable and the results of the dynamic characteristics are credible. Comparing the results of the two cablestayed bridges, the researchers found the following.
(1) The frequencies decrease if initial stress is considered. This is because the main girder and pylon are mainly compressed, and their structural stiffnesses decrease after considering initial stress. However, the difference between the two results is unobvious.
(2) The vertical bending natural vibration frequencies of the cablestayed bridge using CFRP cables are lower than those using steel cables because the elastic modulus of the CFRP cable is smaller than that of steel cable. This leads to smaller elastic support stiffness for the main girder, which is in accordance with the static characteristic. It is also found that, with increasing span of the bridge, the sag effect increases, and the equivalent elastic modulus decreases. However, if the span is greater than a certain value, the vertical bending natural vibration frequency of CFRP cablestayed bridge will be higher than steel cablestayed bridges.
(3) The torsional natural vibration frequency of CFRP cablestayed bridge is a bit higher than that of steel cablestayed bridge because the CFRP cables are lighter and provide a smaller mass moment of inertia. With increasing span, the equivalent elastic modulus of CFRP cables increases faster than that of steel cables. Hence, the torsional natural vibration frequency of CFRP cablestayed bridge will be much higher than that of steel cablestayed bridge, which is beneficial for improving the flutter critical wind speed.
3.2. Analysis of the Parameter Influencing Dynamic Characteristics of CFRP CableStayed Bridge
3.2.1. The Influence of Structural System
The common structural systems of longspan cablestayed bridges can be classified into four types: fullfloating system, halffloating system, rigidframe system, and towerbeam elastic restraint system. The dynamic properties of different kinds of structural systems of the CFRP cablestayed bridge are compared in this section. The longitudinal elastic restraint stiffness is 12,000 kN/m for towerbeam elastic restraint system. Table 6 lists the main vibration modes and corresponding frequencies.

Table 6 shows that the natural vibration frequency values of the fullfloating system are very close to those of the halffloating system. Given that the longitudinal displacement is not constrained, the natural vibration frequency of the firstorder longitudinal floating mode is relatively low. This is essential to reduce the responses of the structure under horizontal seismic action. But with increasing span, displacement response at the beam end will become too large to accept. The vertical bending natural vibration frequency changes unobviously after setting a vertical bearing, indicating that setting a vertical bearing has little impact on the overall stiffness. The longitudinal stiffness of the rigidframe system is the largest, so the longitudinal vibration mode does not appear alone. Moreover, the lateral bending and torsional natural vibration frequencies visibly increase at the same time. Comparing the fullfloating system and the halffloating system, only the longitudinal floating mode natural vibration frequency of towerbeam elastic restraint system increases whereas other frequencies change slightly. The towerbeam elastic restraint system meets the requirements of bearing capacity and deformation of the cablestayed bridge at the same time; therefore, it is applicable in superlongspan cablestayed bridge.
3.2.2. The Influence of the Numbers of SideSpan Auxiliary Piers
The influence of the numbers of sidespan auxiliary piers on structure dynamic performance is analyzed in the following. Table 7 lists the main vibration modes and the corresponding frequencies.

Table 7 shows that the first lateral and vertical natural vibration frequencies visibly increase when one auxiliary pier is set at two side spans. When two auxiliary piers are set up, the first lateral and vertical natural vibration frequencies further increase. However, when three auxiliary piers are set, only a slight increase is observed. Notably, the increase of lateral bending natural vibration frequency results from setting a lateral horizontal restraint for the girder at the auxiliary pier.
3.2.3. The Influence of Space Arrangement Type of Stay Cables
Singlecable plane and doublecable plane are two general arrangements in cablestayed bridges. The double cable plane includes parallel double cable plane and inclined double cable plane. The influences of arrangement forms on structure dynamic performance are analyzed in this section. Table 8 lists the main vibration modes and the corresponding frequencies. The torsional vibration mode of the cablestayed bridges with different cable planes is shown in Figure 12.

(a) Inclined cable plane
(b) Parallel cable plane
Table 8 shows that lateral bending natural vibration frequencies of pylon with parallel cable plane are smaller than those with inclined cable plane. This is because the “H” pylon is selected for parallel plane cable and its lateral bending stiffness is smaller than the “Y” pylon. In addition, the first torsional natural vibration frequency of the main girder with inclined cable plane is approximately 20% higher than that with the parallel cable plane because when torsional deformation of the main girder occurs, the two pillars of the “H” pylon are in harmony with the expansion deformation of the parallel cable by reverse bending, thereby resulting in a reduction in torsional rigidity provided by the stay cable. Given that higher torsional fundamental frequency is beneficial in improving wind resistance stability of cablestayed bridge, an inclined cable plane arrangement type is suggested to be selected in a largespan cablestayed bridge.
4. Conclusions
Two 1000 m span cablestayed bridges using CFRP cable and steel cables, respectively, were preliminarily designed. The static and dynamic performances of the two kinds of bridges were analyzed using FEM. The effects of geometric nonlinear factors on static performance and the influences of design parameters, including different structural systems, the numbers of auxiliary piers, and the space arrangement types of cable, on the dynamic performance of the cablestayed bridge using CFRP cables were also studied. The following specific conclusions can be drawn.
(1) The displacements of the cablestayed bridges using CFRP cables exhibit a little difference, whereas the displacements at the midspan of steel cablestayed bridge increase by 7.5%, when the sag effect is taken into account.. With increasing span, the sag effect of steel cable will be larger than that of CFRP cable. Besides, the beamcolumn effects of the two bridges are both great, whereas the large displacement effects are relatively small.
(2) The girder’s bending moment at the pylon and displacement at midspan of CFRP cablestayed bridge due to temperature are less than those of steel cablestayed bridge, which is beneficial for the service performance of the whole bridge.
(3) The vertical bending natural vibration frequency of the CFRP cablestayed bridge is generally lower than that of steel cablestayed bridge, whereas the torsion natural vibration frequency of the former is higher than that of the latter. A higher torsionbend frequency ratio is beneficial for enhancing the critical flutter wind speed.
(4) Comparing the fullfloating system and the halffloating system, only the longitudinal floating mode natural vibration frequency of the towerbeam elastic restraint system increases, whereas the other frequencies change slightly. Obviously, the towerbeam elastic restraint system is applicable in the superlongspan cablestayed bridge.
(5) Setting up one or two auxiliary piers can improve the lateral and vertical fundamental frequencies. However, when three auxiliary piers are set up, only a slight increase is observed. Therefore, setting up 23 auxiliary piers is enough and the numbers of piers should not be more than 3.
(6) The first torsional natural vibration frequency of the main girder with inclined cable plane is approximately 20% higher than that with parallel cable plane. Considering that the higher torsional natural vibration frequency can improve wind resistance stability of cablestayed bridge, the inclined cable plane is more suitable for longspan cablestayed bridge.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51778059) for their support.
References
 U. Meier and H. Meier, “CFRP finds use in cable support for bridge,” Modern Plastics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 87–91, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 U. Meier, “Structural tensile elements made of advanced composite materials,” Structural Engineering International, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 281–285, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 U. Meier, “Carbon fiber reinforced polymer cables: why? why not? what if?” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 399–411, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Nik and K. Pascal, “Carbon fiber products (CFP): a construction material for the next century,” in Proceedings of the 13th FIP Congress, pp. 69–72, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 V. M. Karbhari and F. Seible, “Fiberreinforced polymer composites for civil infrastructure in the USA,” Structural Engineering International, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 274–277, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 C. J. Burgoyne, “Advanced composites in civil engineering in europe,” Structural Engineering International, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 267–273, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Lanza di Scalea, V. M. Karbhari, and F. Seible, “The I5/Gilman advanced technology bridge project,” in Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, pp. 10–17, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Lu and K. Mei, “First application of CFRP cables for a cablestayed bridge in China,” China Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 K. H. Mei, Study on the cablestayed bridge with CFRP cables [Ph.D. thesis], Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2005.
 M. A. Khalifa, O. A. Hodhod, and M. A. Zaki, “Analysis and design methodology for an FRP cablestayed pedestrian bridge,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 27, no. 34, pp. 307–317, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Adanur and M. Gunaydin, “Stochastic seismic analysis of a cablestayed bridge using CFRP cables,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Balkans Conferences on Challenges of Civil Engineering (BCCCE '13), Tirana, Albania, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Adanur, M. Gunaydin, A. C. Altunisik, and B. Sevim, “Dynamic behavior of a cable stayed bridge using CFRP cables,” in Proceedings of the Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (VEESD '13), C. Adam, R. Heuer, W. Lenhardt, and C. Schranz, Eds., Vienna, Austria, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Cheng and D. T. Lau, “Impact of using CFRP cables on the dynamic behaviour of cablestayed bridges,” IABSE Symposium Report, vol. 92, no. 13, pp. 19–26, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. H. Mei and Z. T. Lu, “Static characteristic analysis of CFRP cables,” China Journal of Highway and Transport, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 43–45, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Xie, H. Zhang, Y.F. Zhu, and C.H. Kou, “Dynamic characteristics of CFRP cables under lateral wind load,” Journal of Zhejiang University, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 145–151, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 X.J. Zhang and L.D. Ying, “Windresistant performance of cablesupported bridges using carbon fiber reinforced polymer cables,” Wind and Structures, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 121–133, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C.H. Kou, X. Xie, C.S. Gao, and J.Y. Huang, “Static behavior of longspan cablestayed bridges using carbon fiber composite cable,” Journal of Zhejiang University, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 137–142, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Xie, J. S. Gao, C. H. Kou, and J. Y. Huang, “Structural dynamic behavior of longspan cablestayed bridges using carbon fiber composite cable,” Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 728–733, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Xie, X. Li, and Y. Shen, “Static and dynamic characteristics of a longspan cablestayed bridge with CFRP cables,” Materials, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 4854–4877, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Wang, Z. Wu, G. Wu, H. Zhu, and F. Zen, “Enhancement of basalt FRP by hybridization for longspan cablestayed bridge,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 184–192, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Wang and Z. Wu, “Evaluation of FRP and hybrid FRP cables for super longspan cablestayed bridges,” Composite Structures, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 2582–2590, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Wang and Z. Wu, “Integrated highperformance thousandmetre scale cablestayed bridge with hybrid FRP cables,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Fang, L. Ren, and F. Fan, “Behaviors of superlong span prestressed cablestayed bridge with CFRP cables and UHPC girder,” Engineering Sciences, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 53–59, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Xiong, C. S. Cai, R. Xiao, and L. Deng, “Concept and analysis of stay cables with a CFRP and steel composite section,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. S. Wu and X. Wang, “Investigation on a thousandmeter scale cablestayed bridge with fiber composite cables,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, July 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Xiong, C. S. Cai, Y. Zhang, and R. Xiao, “Study of super long span cablestayed bridges with CFRP components,” Engineering Structures, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 330–343, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Li, Y. Huang, W. L. Chen, M. L. Ma, D. W. Tao, and J. P. Ou, “Estimation and warning of fatigue damage of FRP stay cables based on acoustic emission techniques and fractal theory,” ComputerAided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 500–512, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. H. Wang, Structure Develop of CableStayed Bridge and Chinese Experience, China Communications Press, 2003.
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Mei Kuihua et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.