Research Article
Using Expert Opinion to Quantify Uncertainty in and Cost of Using Nondestructive Evaluation on Bridges
Table 6
Concrete and steel NDE methods response descriptive statistics for the reliability and the COVs indicated by participant responses.
| | Average | Standard deviation | COVs indicated by participant responses |
| Concrete NDE methods | | | | Cover meters/pachometer | 4.13 | 0.83 | 0.078 | Electrical potential | 3.50 | 0.84 | 0.093 | Impact echo | 3.40 | 0.55 | 0.097 | Mechanical sounding | 4.11 | 0.78 | 0.078 | Radar | 3.71 | 1.11 | 0.086 | Rebound hammer | 2.67 | 0.82 | 0.147 | Thermal | 2.60 | 0.89 | 0.153 | Ultrasonic testing | 4.14 | 0.90 | 0.078 | Visual inspection | 4.00 | 0.87 | 0.080 | Steel NDE methods | | | | Acoustic emission | 4.00 | — | 0.080 | Liquid penetrant testing | 3.67 | 1.21 | 0.088 | Magnetic particle testing-crack detection | 4.00 | 0.71 | 0.080 | Magnetic particle testing-weld inspection | 3.75 | 0.50 | 0.085 | Radiography | 4.25 | 0.50 | 0.076 | Ultrasonic testing-crack detection | 3.80 | 0.45 | 0.084 | Ultrasonic testing-pin inspection | 3.83 | 0.75 | 0.083 | Ultrasonic testing-weld Inspection | 4.00 | 0.82 | 0.080 | Visual inspection | 3.67 | 1.03 | 0.088 |
|
|