Research Article
Urban Vulnerability Assessment Using AHP
Table 5
Importance level of physical vulnerability of Qazvin city.
| Physical vulnerability criteria of Qazvin city | Number | Subcriteria | No importance | Very low importance | Partly no importance | Low importance | Below average importance | Average importance | Above average importance | Partly high importance | High importance | Very high importance | Special importance |
| 1 | Average area slope (A) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 2 | (Reverse number) distance to faults from the region (B) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 3 | (Reverse number) average distance to industrial, chemical, nuclear areas (C) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 4 | (Reverse number) region distance to river and watercourse (D) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 5 | Area of old and repairable buildings in the region (E) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 6 | Building segments less than 200 square meters in the region (F) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 7 | Average number of units in the buildings of the region (G) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | The average number of floors (H) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | Especial land uses area in the region (I) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|
|