Political Risk Paths in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Construction Enterprises

Table 5

Path coefficients and significance.

Path	Coefficient	t-value	Interpretation
F → A	0.097	1.116	Not supported
F → C	0.265	1.894	Supported
F → D	0.278	1.713	Supported
F → E	0.134	1.332	Not supported
D → A	0.484	5.389	Supported
D → B	0.567	6.258	Supported
D → C	0.632	10.021	Supported
D → E	0.175	1.602	Not supported
D → I	−0.248	1.753	Supported
A → B	0.611	9.876	Supported
A → C	0.445	6.214	Supported
A → E	0.123	0.935	Not supported
A → I	−0.235	1.851	Supported
B → I	−0.373	4.712	Supported
C → I	−0.328	3.351	Supported
E → I	−0.246	2.393	Supported
G → I	−0.289	2.351	Supported
H → I	−0.257	1.989	Supported

Note. Path is significant at the level. Path is significant at the level. Path is significant at the level.