Advances in Civil Engineering

Advances in Civil Engineering / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 8905194 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8905194

Mechanical Properties of Na2CO3-Activated High-Volume GGBFS Cement Paste

Academic Editor: Flora Faleschini
Received30 Jan 2018
Revised10 Apr 2018
Accepted20 May 2018
Published25 Jun 2018

Abstract

The use of Na2CO3 to improve the mechanical properties of high-volume slag cement (HVSC) is experimentally investigated in this study. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was replaced with 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) by weight. Na2CO3 was added at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 wt.% of HVSC (OPC + GGBFS). The compressive strength, water absorption, ultrasonic pulse velocity, dry shrinkage, and X-ray diffraction spectra of the Na2CO3-activated HVSC pastes were analyzed. The results indicate that Na2CO3 was effective for improving the strength of HVSC samples at both early and later ages. There was a trend of increasing HVSC sample strength with increasing Na2CO3 content. The 5% Na2CO3-activated HVSC (50% OPC + 50% GGBFS) paste had the best combination of early to later-age strength development and exhibited the highest UPV and the lowest water absorption among the Na2CO3-activated HVSC samples at later age.

1. Introduction

Ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) is a by-product of steel manufacturing that has been used as a mineral admixture in concrete for many years. Because this material is cheaper than Portland cement, its incorporation as a replacement for Portland cement in concrete mixtures provides both economic and environmental benefits [1, 2].

Cement containing high volumes of GGBFS is referred to as high-volume slag cement (HVSC) and has been widely studied for its role in industrial by-product recycling and substantial reduction in Portland cement usage. Several studies have noted that the use of HVSC material can provide benefits [38] including reduced hydration heat and improved sulfate resistance, chloride resistance, durability, and corrosion resistance. However, there are still problems with the mechanical properties of HVSC [7, 9]. For instance, HVSC results in lower early strength, higher drying shrinkage, and lower carbonation resistance. In order to safely use HVSC in concrete production, their drawbacks should be improved. Some studies have indicated that the low early strength of HVSC can be overcome by adding alkali activators (e.g., sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, or sodium sulfate) that are typically used for activation of GGBFS. Singh et al. [10] studied the effect of 4 wt.% Na2SO4 on HVSC and reported that addition of the alkali activator to GGBFS-blended Portland cement results in an acceleration of the hydration reaction due to the activation of GGBFS. The activation of GGBFS by the alkali leads to formation of an additional amount of calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H), which increases the compressive strength. Sajedi and Razak [11] studied the effect of chemical activators (NaOH, KOH, and Na2SiO3) on the early strength of HVSC mortars. They mentioned that Na2SiO3 gives the highest strength value, whereas NaOH results in the lowest strength. Wu et al. [12] reported the effect of additives (Na2SO4, calcium aluminate cement, and potassium aluminum sulfate) on the compressive strength of HVSC mortars. They noted that the early-age strength of mortar with additives is higher than that without additives and proposed that increasing the amount of additive could result in an increase in the early-age strength. Acevedo-Martinez et al. [13] studied the strength development and microstructures of HVSC activated with different concentrations of Na2O using water glass (Na2SiO3). The results indicated that increasing the percentage of Na2O produced denser and more compact matrices of hydration products in HVSC, which was reflected in improved strength. Previous studies have explored the use of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) source for activating GGBFS [1417]. Abdalqader et al. [17] reported the effect on the compressive strength of using Na2CO3 for the activation of fly ash and slag blends. They noted that the strength of Na2CO3-activated fly ash-slag blends increased with curing time and Na2CO3 content, and the strength at early ages depended on the Na2CO3 content. Thus, it can be expected that Na2CO3 could play a role in the early-age strength development of HVSC. However, research on the early-age strength of HVSC with Na2CO3 as the main activator is limited in comparison with research on HVSC focused on Na2SiO3, Na2SO4, and NaOH activators.

The primary objective of this study was to carry out an experimental investigation to explore the effect of Na2CO3 for improving early strength and other mechanical properties of pastes with high volumes of slag. The compressive strength, water absorption, ultrasonic pulse velocity, dry shrinkage, and X-ray diffraction of HVSC pastes activated with varying Na2CO3 content were analyzed.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Materials

The cement used in this study was ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with a specific gravity of 3.15 g/cm3 and a Blaine fineness of 330 m2/kg. The cement was supplied by S company in South Korea. GGBFS was produced by the K iron steel company in South Korea; it has a specific gravity and Blaine fineness of 2.8 g/cm3 and 420 m2/kg, respectively. The chemical composition of the cement and GGBFS was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry and is summarized in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of the raw materials. Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3, anhydrous, ≥99%, C company, South Korea) was used as the alkali activator.


SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOTiO2MnOSO3K2O

OPC21.325.613.1261.723.942.510.79
GGBFS35.3012.580.7941.303.190.700.224.750.63

2.2. Mixture Proportions, Sample Preparation, and Curing

Mixture proportions of the samples are summarized in Table 2. The OPC was partially replaced with 50, 60, 70, 80, or 90% GGBFS (by weight). The weight ratio of water to the binder (OPC + GGBFS) was 0.45. Na2CO3 was added at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 wt.% of the binder for each mixture. The 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% GGBFS replacement levels are denoted as R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9, respectively. A total of 30 different paste mixtures were prepared in the laboratory according to ASTM C305 [18]. After mixing, cubic samples of 50 × 50 × 50 mm were cast for use in the determination of compressive strength and water absorption. Samples of 40 × 40 × 160 mm were cast for determination of dry shrinkage and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). All samples were cured at a temperature of 23 ± 2°C and 80 ± 5% relative humidity until testing.


Sample IDOPC (wt.%)GGBFS (wt.%)Na2CO3 content (wt.% of OPC + GGBFS)

R550500, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
R640600, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
R730700, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
R820800, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
R910900, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

The compressive strengths of the hardened HVSC pastes were measured at 3, 7, and 28 d. The results are reported as an average of three samples. XRD was performed at 3 and 28 d. Fractured specimens from the strength tests were finely powdered and immersed in isopropanol to stop hydration. After vacuum drying, particles passing through a no. 200 sieve were used for XRD analyses. The water absorption, dry shrinkage, and UPV tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM C642 [19], C157 [20], and C597 [21], respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Compressive Strength Development

The compressive strengths of HVSC pastes with and without Na2CO3 are shown in Figure 2. Previous studies [7, 11, 22, 23] reported a decrease in compressive strength with increasing slag content in slag-cement systems. For the R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9 samples without the Na2CO3 activator, the strengths decreased slightly with increasing replacement level of GGBFS. This result is in agreement with previous studies on HVSC [7, 11, 22, 23].

For the R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9 samples with the Na2CO3 activator, the strengths of samples were higher than those of the samples without Na2CO3 at all ages, regardless of the amount of Na2CO3 added. The exception to this was the R8 sample, in which Na2CO3 contents of 3% or more showed higher strength than 0% Na2CO3. With respect to the amount of added Na2CO3, the results indicated that there is a trend of increasing strength with increasing Na2CO3 content, except for the R6 and R7 samples. The R6 and R7 samples showed a decrease in strength at the addition of 5% Na2CO3.

Table 3 presents a comparison of the strengths of samples with Na2CO3 relative to the results without the activator. The results listed are given relative to the strength of the sample without Na2CO3, which was considered to have a value of 100%. The strength of the HVSC with Na2CO3 was 3.06∼64.29% greater after 3 days of curing, compared to that without Na2CO3. The strength results showed that the addition of Na2CO3 contributed to the improvement in both the early- and later-age strengths in the HVSC system.


Sample IDAge (d)Na2CO3 content (wt.%)
12345

R53114.98120.66125.17145.57147.85
7105.61119.28121.68125.13137.29
28103.62111.19117.80143.12158.88

R63112.07117.04122.83151.23128.96
7118.28119.64134.74152.14124.80
28113.36135.05153.53159.60156.40

R73105.93107.89134.02157.58145.22
7115.00118.75135.22147.86150.71
28108.62120.66136.61158.25163.63

R83103.06105.42126.21141.14164.29
789.6697.82120.26131.90154.34
2891.33108.71121.55139.43168.00

R93104.77109.94122.47129.75143.17
7100.00106.74119.21137.36144.83
28103.48105.49117.01133.86144.51

The results are listed relative to the strength of the sample without Na2CO3, which was considered to have a value of 100%.
3.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

XRD spectra of the HVSC samples with Na2CO3 are shown in Figure 3. Generally, the XRD spectra show the typical contributions of hydrated cement: portlandite [Ca(OH)2] and C–S–H. As the amount of OPC decreases (R5 → R6 → R7 → R8 → R9 sample), the intensity of the portlandite reflections becomes weak until the peaks corresponding to portlandite are no longer observed in the XRD spectra. There seems to be no portlandite phase in the R8 (20% OPC + 80% GGBFS) or R9 (10% OPC + 90% GGBFS) samples (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)). For the R5, R6, and R7 samples, the intensity of the portlandite peaks decreases with increasing amount of Na2CO3. This may indicate that the addition of Na2CO3 contributes to an increase in GGBFS activation, which then leads to an enhancement of the GGBFS pozzolanic reaction [24, 25]. As a result, it would be likely to form additional C–S–H. Kovtun et al. [26] reported on the Na2CO3-activated slag concrete accelerated by different admixtures. They used NaOH, OPC, and a combination of silica fume and slaked lime as a chemical accelerator. They mentioned that slag hydration could be accelerated by C–S–H formed in the rapid cement hydration, which is attributed to the alkaline solution of Na2CO3. For each sample in this study, it was observed that the formation of C–S–H was increased with increasing the addition of Na2CO3. It could imply the rapid hydration reaction of C3S and C2S compounds in the OPC due to the use of Na2CO3 because the compounds play a role in generating C–S–H gel during the hydration reaction. It was identified that the peaks of C3S and C2S decrease as the amount of Na2CO3 increases.

Bernal et al. [16] reported that the early-age reaction in a CO32−-activated binder occurs between CO32− in pore solution and Ca2+ released by slag dissolution. They mentioned that enough Ca2+ could lead to consume CO32− in the early age, thus resulting in the acceleration of slag hydration. They explained that the acceleration is because the slag hydration starts after the CO32− is exhausted. In this study, OPC was used as a source of calcium in order to consume carbonate. It was observed that the calcite was formed at the age of 3 days in the R5 sample, and the calcite was increased with increasing the content of Na2CO3. As a result, it can be seen that the use of Na2CO3 led to the formation of additional C–S–H and the generation of calcite, thus increasing the strength of the HVSC sample.

3.3. Water Absorption

Figure 4 shows the results of water absorption tests for the HVSC pastes with and without Na2CO3. Samples with low strength could not give accurate water absorption results because the weak texture on the surface of the sample softened and came off during water immersion. Therefore, the water absorption was measured for samples at 28 days, when it could be accurately obtained for all samples.

As water absorption can be partially affected by cracks and pores in the samples [27], a sample with low water absorption is likely to imply that it has a relatively dense matrix. Increasing water absorption is thus associated with a reduction in strength. Previous studies [5, 23] reported that the water absorption of HVSC decreased with increasing replacement level of GGBFS in slag-cement systems. In contrast, Chen and Brouwer [28] noted that with increasing slag content in slag-OPC mixtures, the total porosity also increased and suggested that this could be due to the low degree of slag hydration in OPC. It can be deduced from their study [28] that as the slag content increases, the water absorption would increase due to the increase of total porosity. This result is close to our findings. This study showed that with increasing amount of GGBFS, the water absorption of HVSC pastes without Na2CO3 increased, and the compressive strengths decreased. With respect to the amount of added Na2CO3, as the amount of Na2CO3 increases, the water absorption decreased, implying that the strength would be higher with the amount of added Na2CO3.

Mo et al. [29] reported that the formation of CaCO3 in the steel slag pastes is attributed to the microstructure densification, thereby improving the strength of the pastes. In Figure 3, the R5 sample had the highest calcite peak compared with other samples. It can indicate that the R5 sample has a denser microstructure than other samples, which would result in the reduction of water absorption. It can be seen that the R5 sample gives lower water absorption than other samples. Note that the reaction products were portlandite and C–S–H as well as calcite. Therefore, it is clear overall that water absorption of samples would not be influenced only by the formation of calcite. It could be seen that the combined action of calcite and C–S–H gel has an effect on reducing water absorption by decreasing the overall porosity of the matrix.

3.4. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV)

UPV results for HVSC samples at the ages of 3 and 28 days are shown in Figure 5. UPV can be used to predict the quality of hardened samples, as UPV is related to the strength of the samples [22, 30]. Higher UPV values indicate higher strength. This study showed that UPV, for each Na2CO3 content, decreased with increasing GGBFS content (R5 → R6 → R7 → R8 → R9 sample). It can be mentioned that as the amount of GGBFS increases, the quality of matrix in samples would be comparatively lower, which could cause decrease in strength. When Na2CO3 was added to the HVSC sample, the UPV increased with increasing Na2CO3 content for all mixtures. In addition, the UPV values tended to increase with curing age for all samples. An increase in UPV implies that more reaction products were produced in the sample during the activation and hydration of the binder, and thus, the sample matrix would be denser, resulting in the improvement of strength.

Considering the density of reaction products, calcite has 2.71 g/cm3 and portlandite has 2.44 g/cm3 [29]. It is clear that the density of calcite is higher than that of portlandite. It is expected that the density of a reaction product could be related to the microstructure densification in the sample. The XRD result showed that the higher the content of OPC and the higher the concentration of Na2CO3, the greater the amount of calcite formed. The increase in calcite with higher density than other reaction products under the same circumstances could imply that HVSC density would be increased. It would lead to the improvement of microstructure densification and the increase in the UPV.

Figure 6 shows the relationship between UPV and water absorption for all samples at 28 days. It is found that the UPV is related to the water absorption of the hardened samples: the higher the UPV, the lower the water absorption. This suggests that the addition of Na2CO3 is effective for increasing the densification of HVSC samples. It is also confirmed in Figure 6 that the sample with the highest UPV and lowest water absorption at 28 days is the R5 sample with 5% Na2CO3.

3.5. Shrinkage

Shrinkage generally occurs at an early age [31], and the maximum shrinkage rate occurs during the first 7 days of aging [32]. In this study, the shrinkage of HVSC samples with varying Na2CO3 contents was measured for 35 days, in accordance with ASTM C157 [20]. Figure 7 shows the shrinkage results after 35 days of aging.

As previously noted, increasing the amount of GGBFS resulted in an increase in water absorption and a decrease in UPV, as the mechanical properties of Na2CO3-activated HVSC pastes are related to the quality of hardened samples by the amount of GGBFS. However, drying shrinkage of HVSC samples has a different tendency from UPV or water absorption. R5 and R6 samples increase with increasing the content of Na2CO3. The R7 sample shows similar dry shrinkage regardless of Na2CO3 content. R8 and R9 samples decrease the drying shrinkage with increasing Na2CO3 content. Duran Atiş et al. [33] studied the influence of activators on the dry shrinkage of alkali-activated slag mortar and showed that a Na2CO3-activated slag mortar with an 8% Na concentration had greater shrinkage than that with 4% Na at 28 days. At the same time, the sample strength with 8% Na was higher than that with 4% Na. Some studies [31, 3437] have found that the activator dosage, porosity, pore size distribution, and curing conditions can influence the dry shrinkage of alkali-activated slag. In this study, the different drying shrinkage tendencies based on the R7 sample can be considered as follows: because the drying shrinkage of samples was measured only up to 35 days, the results can be different from long-term age shrinkage. In the cases of R5 and R6 samples, the drying shrinkage was high. It would be due to the high OPC content in the HVSC sample. On the contrary, R8 and R9 samples would be relatively slow in reactivity due to the low OPC content. Therefore, the samples were still undergoing hydration reaction, and the shrinkage would not be completed. In the case of the R7 sample, there was little change in drying shrinkage. It seems that the hydration reaction of OPC and GGBFS was simultaneously proceeding. It can indicate the importance to make the measurement until the long-term age.

4. Conclusions

The following conclusions were obtained from the results of this experimental investigation:

The HVSC samples with the Na2CO3 activator generally produced greater strength than those without Na2CO3 at early and later ages, regardless of the amount of added Na2CO3. It was identified that Na2CO3 was effective for increasing the HVSC sample strength at all ages. With respect to the amount of added Na2CO3, the strength of HVSC samples increased with increasing Na2CO3 content. The compressive strength results indicated that the optimum combination for the early and later ages was the R5 sample with 5% Na2CO3.

The CO32− ion of Na2CO3 forms calcite with Ca2+ released by GGBFS dissolution. It indicated that the addition of Na2CO3 in the HVSC sample contributes to an increase in GGBFS activation, which then leads to an enhancement of the GGBFS pozzolanic reaction. As the amount of Na2CO3 increases, the peaks of calcite and C–S–H in HVSC samples increased.

Additional C–S–H formation due to GGBFS pozzolanic reaction and the generation of calcite would lead to the improvement of microstructure densification in the HVSC sample. The HVSC samples with Na2CO3 resulted in a decrease in water absorption and an increase in UPV, comparing to the HVSC without Na2CO3. The drying shrinkage of HVSC samples should be taken into consideration of the long-term measurement and GGBFS hydration degree.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2014R1A1A3052424) and the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A3A01019583 and NRF-2017R1D1A1B03034700).

References

  1. X. Shi, N. Xie, K. Fortune, and J. Gong, “Durability of steel reinforced concrete in chloride environments: an overview,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 30, pp. 125–138, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. R. L. Silva, L. R. Prudêncio Jr., A. L. Oliveira, G. Damo, and E. Tochetto, “Influence of air temperature on the performance of different water-reducing admixtures with respect to the properties of fresh and hardened mortar,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2010, Article ID 136768, 10 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. A. M. Basheer, P. R. V. Gilleece, A. E. Long, and W. J. Mc Carter, “Monitoring electrical resistance of concretes containing alternative cementitious materials to assess their resistance to chloride penetration,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 437–449, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. Gruyaert, P. Van den Heede, M. Maes, and N. De Belie, “Investigation of the influence of blast-furnace slag on the resistance of concrete against organic acid or sulphate attack by means of accelerated degradation tests,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 173–185, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. G. Güneyisis and M. Gesoğlu, “A study on durability properties of high-performance concretes incorporating high replacement levels of slag,” Materials of Structures, vol. 41, pp. 479–493, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. E.-D. H. Seleem, A. M. Rashad, and B. A. El-Sabbagh, “Durability and strength evaluation of high-performance concrete in marine structures,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 878–884, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H.-S. Shi, B.-W. Xu, and X.-C. Zhou, “Influence of mineral admixtures on compressive strength, gas permeability and carbonation of high performance concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1980–1985, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H.-W. Song and V. Saraswathy, “Studies on the corrosion resistance of reinforced steel in concrete with ground granulated blast-furnace slag—an overview,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 226–233, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Živica, “Alkali-silicate admixture for cement composites incorporating pozzolan or blast furnace slag,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1215–1222, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Singh, S. Ray, and N. B. Singh, “Effect of sodium sulfate on the hydration of granulated blast furnace slag blended Portland cement,” Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Science, vol. 8, pp. 110–113, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  11. F. Sajedi and H. A. Razak, “The effect of chemical activators on early strength of ordinary Portland cement-slag mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1944–1951, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Wu, W. Jiang, and D. M. Roy, “Early activation and properties of slag cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 961–974, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Acevedo-Martinez, L. Y. Gomez-Zamorano, and J. I. Escalante-Garcia, “Portland cement-blast furnace slag mortars activated using waterglass: part 1: effect of slag replacement and alkali concentration,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 37, pp. 462–469, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Wang, X. Lyu, L. Wang, X. Cao, Q. Liu, and H. Zang, “Influence of the combination of calcium oxide and sodium carbonate on the hydration reactivity of alkali-activated slag binders,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 171, pp. 622–629, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Ellis, R. Silvestrini, B. Varela, N. Alharbi, and R. Hailstone, “Modeling setting time and compressive strength in sodium carbonate activated blast furnace slag mortars using statistical mixture design,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 74, pp. 1–6, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, R. J. Myers, R. San Nicolas, and J. S. J. van Deventer, “Role of carbonates in the chemical evolution of sodium carbonate-activated slag binders,” Materials and Structures, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 517–529, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. F. Abdalqader, F. Jin, and A. Al-Tabbaa, “Characterisation of reactive magnesia and sodium carbonate-activated fly ash/slag paste blends,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 93, pp. 506–513, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. ASTM, Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
  19. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013.
  20. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
  21. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  22. R. Demirboğa, İ. Türkmen, and M. B. Karakoç, “Relationship between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2329–2336, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Hadj-sadok, S. Kenai, L. Courard, and A. Darimont, “Microstructure and durability of mortars modified with medium active blast furnace slag,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1018–1025, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Guerrero, M. S. Hernández, and S. Goñi, “The role of the fly ash pozzolanic activity in simulated sulphate radioactive liquid waste,” Waste Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. El-Didamony, A. A. Amer, and H. Abd Ela-ziz, “Properties and durability of alkali-activated slag pastes immersed in sea water,” Ceramics International, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 3773–3780, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Kovtun, E. P. Kearsley, and J. Shekhovtsova, “Chemical acceleration of a neutral granulated blast-furnace slag activated by sodium carbonate,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 72, pp. 1–9, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. J. Parrott, “Variations of water absorption rate and porosity with depth from an exposed concrete surface: effects of exposure conditions and cement type,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1077–1088, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Chen and H. J. H. Brouwers, “The hydration of slag, part 2: reaction models for blended cement,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 444–464, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. Mo, F. Zhang, and M. Deng, “Mechanical performance and microstructure of the calcium carbonate binders produced by carbonating steel slag paste under CO2 curing,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 88, pp. 217–226, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. H. Kwan, M. Ramli, K. J. Kam, and M. Z. Sulieman, “Influence of the amount of recycled coarse aggregate in concrete design and durability properties,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 565–573, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. A. Melo Neto, M. A. Cincotto, and W. Repette, “Drying and autogenous shrinkage of pastes and mortars with activated slag cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 565–574, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Bakharev, J. G. Sanjayan, and Y. B. Cheng, “Effect of admixtures on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1367–1374, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. Duran Atiş, C. Bilim, Ö. Çelik, and O. Karahan, “Influence of activator on the strength and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 548–555, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. Persson, “A comparison between mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete and the corresponding properties of normal concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 193–198, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. Krizan and B. Zivanovic, “Effects of dosage and modulus of water glass on early hydration of alkali–slag cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1181–1188, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. J. Chang, W. Yeih, and C. C. Hung, “Effects of gypsum and phosphoric acid on the properties of sodium silicate-based alkali-activated slag pastes,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. Li and Y. Sun, “Preliminary study on combined-alkali–slag paste materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 963–966, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Taewan Kim and Yubin Jun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1471 Views | 417 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.