| Social criteria | Indicator | Assessment | References |
| Social wellbeing | Increase of income of local population (€/year) | Quantitative | [48, 49] | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [25, 28, 29, 31, 36, 39–41, 45, 66, 69, 71, 73, 77, 78, 81, 88, 91, 98, 101] | Habitability increase (m2) | Quantitative | [21] | Comfort (hours/year) | Quantitative | [30] |
| Aesthetics | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [23–25, 27, 31, 33, 38, 40, 42, 43, 51, 52, 54,55, 58, 62, 63, 67, 71, 75, 77, 81, 88, 96–98] |
| Job creation | Hours of work/output unit | Quantitative | [64, 65, 68, 70, 87] | Gross value added/hour worked | Quantitative | [99] | Unemployment rate | Quantitative | [96] | Employment increase (%) | Quantitative | [48, 49] | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [45, 66, 69, 73, 77] |
| Development of local economies | GDP increase (€) | Quantitative | [48, 49, 99] | Land value degradation (€/m2) | Quantitative | [96] | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [31, 33, 45, 67, 71, 73, 77, 78, 98] |
| Externalities | Noise pollution (dB) | Quantitative | [19, 90, 92–94, 96] | Traffic congestion (travel time) | Quantitative | [90] | Vehicle operating costs (€), user delay costs (€) | Quantitative | [53] | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [29, 31, 39, 42, 45, 51, 54, 59, 60, 63, 100] |
| Innovation | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [38–40, 45, 75, 98] |
| Culture | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [29, 31, 38, 45, 62, 71, 77, 98] |
| Health and safety | Injuries/output unit | Quantitative | [65, 67, 87] | Fatalities/output unit | Quantitative | [68] | Particulate matter (PM) concentration (PM2.5/PM10) | Quantitative | [36, 90] | Safety costs (€) | Quantitative | [53] | Assessment by experts through point scale | Qualitative | [19, 21, 29, 31–33, 39, 42, 43, 45, 58–60, 75, 77, 82, 85, 88, 91, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100, 101] |
|
|