Review Article

Review of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) as an Empirical Classification and Rock Mass Property Estimation Tool: Origination, Modifications, Applications, and Limitations

Table 1

Empirical methods for rock mass classification and design of engineering structures in rock mass.

S. noEmpirical methodYearApplicationsAuthorsReference

1Rock load1946Tunnels with steel supportTerzaghi[15]
2Stand-up time1958TunnelingLauffer[16]
3Rock quality designation (RQD)1963, 1966TunnelingDeere and Miller[17, 18]
4Rock structure rating (RSR)1972TunnelingWickham et al.[19]
5Rock mass rating (RMR)1973 (modifications 1989)Tunnels, mines, slopesBieniawski[20, 21]
6Tunneling quality index (Q)1974 (last modification 2002)Tunnels, mines, foundationsBarton et al.[22]
7New Austrian tunneling method (NATM)1974TunnelingPacher and Rabcewicz[23]
8Size strength classification1975TunnelingFranklin[24]
9Basic geotechnical classification (BGC)1981GeneralISRM[25]
10Rock mass strength (RMS)1982Metal miningStille and Groth[26]
11Unified rock mass classification system (URCS)1984GeneralWilliamson and Kuhn[27]
12Rock mass index (RMi)1996TunnelingPalmström[28]
13Geological strength index (GSI)1997All underground excavationsHoek and Kaiser[29]
14Rock tunneling quality index by TBM excavation (QTBM)1999TBM tunnelsBarton[30]
15Continuous rock mass rating (CRMR)2003GeneralSen and Bahaaeldin[31]
16Rock mass excitability (RME)2006TBM tunnelsBieniawski von Prein et al.[32]
17Rock mass quality rating (RMQR)2015GeneralAydan et al.[33]
18Modification of the rock mass rating system (rock Bolt Supporting factor (RSF))2017Tunneling and underground excavationsMohammadi and Hossaini[34]
19Anisotropic rock mass rating (ARMR)2018Tunneling and generalSaroglou et al.[35]