Research Article
Vibration-Based Damage Detection of a Steel-Concrete Composite Slab Using Non-Model-Based and Model-Based Methods
Table 1
Comparison of the identified modal information for Case 1 and Case 2.
| No. | Ref Case I | Case 1 | Case 2 | Freq. (Hz) | Damp. (%) | Freq. (Hz) | Damp. (%) | Diff. (%) | Freq. (Hz) | Damp. (%) | Diff. (%) |
| 1 | 20.01 | 2.47 | 18.76 | −3.08 | −6.25 | 19.40 | 2.71 | −3.05 | 2 | 25.32 | 1.52 | 24.06 | −1.80 | 4.98 | 24.93 | 2.02 | −1.54 | 3 | 31.74 | 1.72 | 30.89 | −1.67 | 2.68 | 31.37 | 1.54 | −1.17 | 4 | 69.40 | 6.80 | 65.63 | −2.71 | 5.43 | 69.50 | 8.03 | 0.14 | 5 | 74.54 | 4.11 | — | — | — | 73.75 | 3.05 | −1.06 | 6 | 82.33 | 2.34 | 85.68 | −2.43 | 4.07 | 82.10 | 2.07 | −0.28 | 7 | 110.61 | 4.60 | 103.40 | −3.76 | 6.52 | — | — | — | 8 | 113.50 | 3.19 | 117.55 | −3.49 | 3.57 | 111.43 | 3.68 | −1.82 | 9 | 154.39 | 2.75 | 149.80 | −3.80 | 2.97 | 150.13 | 3.69 | −2.76 |
|
|
Note. , f1 is the measured frequency of Case 1 or Case 2, and fr1 is the measured frequency of Ref Case I. |