Research Article
Development of PMC Numerical Model for Soil and Stone Mixture
Table 4
Comparison table of numerical simulation results of the true triaxial test.
| | Working conditions | M-C | PMC-1 | PMC-1/M-C |
| | Peak strength (MPa) | 42.14 | 42.17 | 1.0007 |
| | X direction | Elastic strain (×10−6) | 1234.03 | 1234.20 | 1.0001 | | Plastic strain (×10−6) | 772.77 | 770.99 | 0.9977 | | Total strain (×10−6) | 2006.80 | 2005.19 | 0.9992 |
| | Y direction | Elastic strain (×10−6) | 555.50 | 556.30 | 1.0014 | | Plastic strain (×10−6) | 0.00 | 0.00 | | | Total strain (×10−6) | 555.50 | 556.30 | 1.0014 |
| | Z direction | Elastic strain (×10−6) | −3733.91 | −3734.15 | 1.0001 | | Plastic strain (×10−6) | −772.76 | −770.98 | 0.9977 | | Total strain (×10−6) | −4506.67 | −4505.13 | 0.9997 | | Average value | 0.9998 | | Coefficient of variation | 0.0013 |
|
|
Note. The positive sign of strain is expansion, and the negative sign is compression. The model does not consider the dilatancy.
|
