Application of Bat Algorithm for Transport Network Design Problem

Table 7

Comparative analysis of TNDP for Sioux Falls network.

	H-J	SA	GP	GA	CS	HS	ABC	DE	BA
y16	3.8	5.38	4.86	5.17	5.09	4.44	5.91	5.15	4.18
y17	3.6	2.26	4.89	2.94	1.35	1.29	1.95	1.65	2.14
y19	3.8	5.45	1.86	4.72	6.45	5.46	4.86	5.89	3.85
y20	2.4	2.33	1.52	1.76	2.29	2.30	1.75	1.29	2.33
y25	2.8	1.27	2.71	2.39	2.90	0.64	2.54	2.58	0.84
y26	1.4	2.33	2.71	2.91	2.05	2.71	2.98	1.69	0.84
y29	3.2	0.41	6.245	2.92	3.67	4.15	3.69	3.32	3.58
y39	4.0	4.59	5.03	5.99	5.22	3.67	3.77	5.11	3.00
y48	4.0	2.71	3.75	3.63	3.42	4.90	3.02	3.26	3.01
y74	4.0	2.71	3.5	4.43	4.87	4.38	4.91	4.50	4.76
	81.77	80.87	82.71	81.74	81.51	81.83	81.78	81.60	81.31
						81.97	82.02	81.76	82.98
						84.67			85.19
No. of UE Assignment	108	3900	9	77	36	27	32	23	140