Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Analytical Cellular Pathology
Volume 2016, Article ID 6074275, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6074275
Research Article

VEGF +936 C/T Genetic Polymorphism in Patients with Cervical Dysplasia

11st Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, Clinicilor 3-5, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2Department of Economic Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manastur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3Department of Molecular Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, Clinicilor 3-5, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
41st Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Received 14 June 2016; Accepted 1 September 2016

Academic Editor: Ilary Ruscito

Copyright © 2016 Ioana Cristina Rotar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Aim. The present study aims to analyze the potential role of VEGF +936 C/T polymorphism in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Material and Method. One hundred and eighty-six patients were included in the study: 75 cases (patients diagnosed with CIN) and 111 controls (negative for both HPV testing and cytology). For each patient a single visit was scheduled when colposcopy was performed. From cervical specimen, cytology and HPV testing were performed and from peripheral blood VEGF +936 genotyping was determined. For statistical analysis purposes OR and chi-square were used at a level of significance of <0.05. Results. No link has been found in the detection of CT genotype in cases versus controls, OR = 0.8295, [0.42, 1.62]. An inverse correlation has been found between T allele and HSIL, OR = 0.2121, [0.0473, 0.9517], . Conclusion. No link has been found between VEGF +936 C/T and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

1. Introduction

Cervical cancer represents even nowadays an important factor of morbidity and mortality being considered as the fourth most frequent cancer in women worldwide [1]. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia corresponds to premalignant lesions [2, 3]. WHO estimates that about 1-2% of all women are diagnosed every year with a CIN+ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) lesion every year [4]. HPV plays a pivotal role in cervical carcinogenesis [5, 6].

Squamous cervical cancer is imagined as a continuous process that takes place above the basal membrane of the cervical squamous epithelium [2, 6]. Different classes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia LSIL (low grade intraepithelial lesion) and HSIL (high grade intraepithelial lesion) corresponding to the bioptic CIN I and, respectively, CINs II and III are seen as different stages of the same condition that can either progress or regress to another cytological category [2]. In LSIL, HPV HR is in most of the patients located in the cytoplasm in an episomal state [2]. In case of persistent HPV HR (High Risk Human Papilloma Virus) infections the formal double circular HPV is disrupted and later integrated in the nuclear host cell DNA leading to the secretion of large amounts of E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins [2].

VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) represents a family of polypeptides including VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E, and placental growth factor (PLGF) [7]. VEGF-A gene is located on 6p21.3 and has eight exons [8]. VEGF acts upon VEGF receptors promoting arterial, venous, and lymphatic vasculogenesis [9]. Moreover VEGF plays essential roles in tumor growth and metastasis [10].

The upregulation of E6 and E7 HPV oncoproteins inactivates tumors repressors p53 and Rb (retinoblastoma) interfering with cell-cycle control, key step of cervical carcinogenesis [11]. Also in primary foreskin keratinocytes the expression of the same molecules, HPV 16 E6 and E7, was associated with increased amounts of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) [12]. Moreover VEGF levels have been found to be elevated in cervical cancers and its precursors [13].

Neoangiogenesis is present in early stages of cervical neoplasia CINs (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia). Vascular pattern assessment represents an important step of colposcopy that helps to stratify the intraepithelial lesions. Vessels are best visualized by using a green filter. Abnormal vessels depicted as mosaic, punctuation, pollarded vessels depending on their characteristic (broadness, appearance, pattern, and branching) are commonly seen in intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer [14].

VEGF exerts important effects upon cervical angiogenesis; therefore, different VEGF genotypes may have impact upon cervical carcinogenesis. The aim of the present study is to analyze the relationship between VEGF +936 C/T (rs3025039) genotypes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

2. Materials and Methods

A total number of 186 patients were enrolled in the present study at 1st Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in 2014. The research was designed as a prospective case control including 75 cases and 111 controls. Inclusions criteria for cases were represented by cytological diagnosis of CINs. The controls were represented by age-matched females with a normal cytology and negative HPV. The refusal to participate in the study was a firm exclusion criterion. After signing the informed consent form all patients were scheduled for a clinical visit. The specific study form was filled for each patient including anamnestic data (age, personal history, obstetric history, and previous CIN). Every patient had a clinical examination followed by colposcopy respecting the four steps (native, green filter, acetic acid, and Lugol’s Iodine solution) using a digital video colposcope (MIKRO MZ6, Prague, Czech Republic) with integrated camera Leica IC80HD® (Prague, Czech Republic). For a better assessment of vascular pattern the green filter was used whenever necessary also after acetic acid application. A cervical specimen was obtained for each patient before the colposcopic examination. In cases of clinical indication a specimen biopsy was taken under colposcopic guidance. All patients with HSIL (high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) were referred for cold knife conization. At the end of the visit 2 mL of peripheral blood was drawn.

Cervical specimens were used for performing liquid based cytology and HR-HPV typing. The cervical cytology was examined in the laboratory of the above mentioned university hospital according to the Bethesda nomenclature [15].

The DNA extraction and genotyping was performed at the Department of Medical Genetics. Genomic DNA was extracted from 300 μL peripheral blood samples using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Promega, MA, USA). The DNA was stored at −20°C before genotyping. VEGF +936 C/T SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) rs3025039 was detected using a RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) as described previously [16].

The study database was created and later analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2007® and STATA Intercooled 10® (College Station, Texas, USA). -test was used for comparison of different classes of women. The relationship between VEGF alleles and genotypes with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was assessed using the chi-square test and the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

3. Results

A total number of 186 patients were enrolled in the study including 75 cases and 111 controls. The distribution of patients after their respective cytological category is depicted in Table 1. The average age was 40.36 years for cases and 42.32 for controls, respectively. No statistical difference regarding average age has been found between cases and controls ( = 1.178, ). Moreover no statistical significance was found in the age of the following groups: LSIL/HSIL ( = 0.182, ), HSIL/CIS ( = 1.867, ), and LSIL/HSIL ( = 1.074, ).

Table 1: Patients classification according to the cytological diagnosis.

As expected wild VEGF +936 CC homozygous genotype was the most frequently encountered (cases: 73.33%; controls: 72.97%) while the heterozygous CT was detected in 26.34%. The VEGF +936 TT homozygous genotype was identified in only one patient with in situ carcinoma; therefore, it was excluded for further statistical analysis. The common variant VEGF allele +936 C was prevalent in cases (86%) and in controls (86.49%). The frequencies of VEGF +936 genotypes and alleles are depicted in Table 2.

Table 2: The distribution of VEGF +936 genotypes and alleles according to the cytological categories.

While examining the relationship between VEGF +936 heterozygous CT genotype and different CINs categories no statistical significant association has been found (data are showed in Table 3). However, data suggested potential protective effect: cases/controls, OR = 0.8295, CI 95% [0.4229, 1.6271], 0.0521, the result being at the limit of significance. The effect seems even more protective for HSIL (OR = 0.6452, ) than for LSIL (OR = 0.7373, ) but still not significant. The complete analysis of the relationship between VEGF genotype and cervical dysplasia can be found in Table 3.

Table 3: VEGF +936 genotype CT analysis.

In Table 4 allelic frequencies are investigated separately in patients with different CINs and controls. No statistical significant differences have been found between cases and controls and, respectively, different CINs and controls. Interestingly the presence of T alleles suggests a significantly different behavior in patients with HSIL than LSIL exerting a potential protective effect (OR = 0.2121, CI 95% [0.0473, 0.9517], ).

Table 4: VEGF +936 alleles analysis; T versus C.

4. Discussion

SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) could be located in any region of a gene structure including introns or exons. SNPs either can have no effect or could upregulate or downregulate gene expression [17]. They occur with a frequency of 1% of the human population and can influence the response of the human body to environmental factors, diseases, drugs, and therapies [17]. The studied polymorphism is located within the promoter, key region of the gene expression [17]. In the present study the expression level was not assessed, but other researchers had demonstrated that this particular SNP is functional [18].

VEGF represents an important molecule for cervical dysplasia [13, 19, 20]. Moreover VEGF-C was identified as independent predictor of CIN II [19].

The exact mechanisms of VEGF action in cervical carcinogenesis are not fully understood. It is not even known exactly what type of cells secretes VEGF being incriminated tumor cells themselves [10, 21] or tumor stromal cells [10]. Certainly VEGF plays a pivotal role in angiogenesis and critical step in solid tumorigenesis including cervical location [10, 21]. In the presence of persistent HPV HR in the integrated form E6 downregulates p53 that stimulates VEGF synthesis [22]. Moreover HPV E6 independently increases VEGF production by stimulating hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) secretion [23].

VEGF stimulates the formation and differentiation of new vessels within the tumor, extremely important in the process of tumor growth [13, 24]. In cervical cancer patient high levels of VEGF are independent negative predictor factor for radiotherapy [25] and chemotherapy [26]. Moreover Wu et al. [27] had demonstrated that VEGF mRNA from liquid based cytology samples can be a useful tool in the triage of abnormal Papanicolaou results.

VEGF is secreted in high amounts in CINs [13], a positive correlation being demonstrated between VEGF levels and different stages of CINs and of cervical cancers [2830].

The presence of T allele at VEGF +936 is associated in healthy women with a lower level of secretion [18]. These findings suggested that the presence of CT genotype (in our study we had only one case of TT genotype; therefore, we could not perform a statistical analysis only on the later genotype) is associated with lower VEGF level. Moreover a presumable diminished VEGF expression might exert protective effects for CIN (genotype CT in cases/controls OR 0.8295, CI 95% [0.4229, 1.6271]). The protective effect seems to be progressive from LSIL to HSIL (LSIL, OR = 0.7373; HSIL, OR = 0.6452). The comparisons between cases, here including LSIL and HSIL, and controls did not reach the level of statistical significance, even if the value of the comparison between cases and controls was extremely close to the superior limit (0.0521). Moreover a presumably protective effect is present in patients with HSIL comparative to LSIL OR = 0.2121, [0.0473, 0.9517]. Taking into account all the values from Tables 3 and 4, we cannot conclude that there is link between VEGF +936 CT polymorphism and cervical dysplasia.

Previous studies from the literature had shown that VEGF expression is directly proportional to the CIN levels, cervical cancer stages, and prognosis [2830]; therefore, an innate potential low VEGF could modulate cervical carcinogenesis.

To date, we have identified only two articles that have analyzed the relationship between cervical cancer and VEGF +936, the results being similar with no statistical significant link found between VEGF +936 genotype and cervical cancer: CT genotype by Kim et al. (2010), cases/controls (/215), OR = 0.88, CI 95% (0.62, 1.23), [31], and, respectively, by Konac et al. (2007), cases/controls (/106), OR = 0.52, CI 95% (0.22–1.23), [32]. The values of OR were similar in the three studies except for one showing potential protective effect.

The relationship between VEGF genetic polymorphism and cervical dysplasia is far from being elucidated in our opinion. The present study opens future research directions; it would be interesting to analyze the colposcopic appearance, VEGF polymorphisms, and VEGF mRNA.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Ioana Cristina Rotar and Daniel Muresan have equally contributed to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Postdoctoral Research Scholarship, Project no. POSDRU/159/1.5/S/138776, “Institutional Collaborative Model of Biomedical Scientific Research Transposed in Clinical Practice—TRANSCENT.”

References

  1. J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. Dikshit et al., “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. E359–E386, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. B. J. Woodman, S. I. Collins, and L. S. Young, “The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. M. Koeneman, R. F. P. M. Kruitwagen, H. W. Nijman, B. F. M. Slangen, T. Van Gorp, and A.-J. Kruse, “Natural history of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review of prognostic biomarkers,” Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 527–546, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines for Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013, http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/screening_and_treatment_of_precancerous_lesions/en/.
  5. H. zur Hausen, “Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 342–350, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Walboomers, M. V. Jacobs, M. M. Manos et al., “Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. I. R. Holmes and I. Zachary, “The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family: angiogenic factors in health and disease,” Genome Biology, vol. 6, no. 2, article 209, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Vincenti, C. Cassano, M. Rocchi, and M. G. Persico, “Assignment of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene to human chromosome 6p21.3,” Circulation, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 1493–1495, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Ferrara, H.-P. Gerber, and J. LeCouter, “The biology of VEGF and its receptors,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 669–676, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. J. Monk, L. J. Willmott, and D. A. Sumner, “Anti-angiogenesis agents in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 181–186, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Narisawa-Saito and T. Kiyono, “Basic mechanisms of high-risk human papillomavirus-induced carcinogenesis: roles of E6 and E7 proteins,” Cancer Science, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 1505–1511, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Toussaint-Smith, D. B. Donner, and A. Roman, “Expression of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins in primary foreskin keratinocytes is sufficient to alter the expression of angiogenic factors,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 2988–2995, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Mandic, S. Usaj Knezevic, and T. Kapicl Ivkovic, “Tissue expression of VEGF in cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaand cervical cancer,” Journal of BUON, vol. 19, pp. 958–964, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. E. J. Mayeaux Jr., Modern Colposcopy Textbook and Atlas, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 3rd edition, 2012.
  15. D. Solomon, D. Davey, R. Kurman et al., “The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 287, no. 16, pp. 2114–2119, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Rodrigues, J. Furriol, E. Tormo, S. Ballester, A. Lluch, and P. Eroles, “The single-nucleotide polymorphisms +936 C/T VEGF and 2710 C/T VEGFR1 are associated with breast cancer protection in a Spanish population,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 769–778, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B.-C. Kim, W.-Y. Kim, D. Park, W.-H. Chung, K.-S. Shin, and J. Bhak, “SNP@Promoter: a database of human SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) within the putative promoter regions,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 9, supplement 1, article S2, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Krippl, U. Langsenlehner, W. Renner et al., “A common 936 C/T gene polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with decreased breast cancer risk,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 468–471, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Branca, C. Giorgi, M. Ciotti et al., “Down-regulation of E-cadherin is closely associated with progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), but not with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) or disease outcome in cervical cancer,” European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 215–223, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I. C. Rotar, D. Muresan, C. Zlatescu, and F. Stamatian, “VEGF and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: new insights,” Obstetrica si Ginecologia LXIII, vol. 2, pp. 97–102, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. S. Kerbel, “Tumor angiogenesis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 19, pp. 2039–2049, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. J. Willmott and B. J. Monk, “Cervical cancer therapy: current, future and anti-angiogensis targeted treatment,” Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 895–903, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Nakamura, J. M. Bodily, M. Beglin, S. Kyo, M. Inoue, and L. A. Laimins, “Hypoxia-specific stabilization of HIF-1alpha by human papillomaviruses,” Virology, vol. 387, no. 2, pp. 442–448, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Tomao, A. Papa, L. Rossi et al., “Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic agents in cervical cancer,” OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 7, pp. 2237–2248, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Bachtiary, E. Selzer, T.-H. Knocke, R. Pötter, and A. Obermair, “Serum VEGF levels in patients undergoing primary radiotherapy for cervical cancer: impact on progression-free survival,” Cancer Letters, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 197–203, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Du, H.-Y. Gong, and Z.-M. Gong, “Influence of serum vegf levels on therapeutic outcome and diagnosis/prognostic value in patients with cervical cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 8793–8796, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M.-Z. Wu, Y. Zhang, X. Wu, Z.-M. Fu, G.-P. Wu, and K.-J. Guo, “Transcription expression and clinical significance of mrna of vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin in liquid-based preparation specimens from patients with cervical dysplasia and carcinoma,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 522–527, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Chopra, T. V. Dinh, and E. V. Hannigan, “Circulating serum levels of cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with cervical cancer,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 152–159, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. J. Guidi, G. Abu-Jawdeh, B. Berse et al., “Vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) expression and angiogenesis in cervical neoplasia,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 87, no. 16, pp. 1237–1245, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Obermair, D. Bancher-Todesca, S. Bilgi et al., “Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and microvessel density in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 89, no. 16, pp. 1212–1217, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. H. Kim, M. A. Kim, I.-A. Park et al., “VEGF polymorphisms in early cervical cancer susceptibility, angiogenesis, and survival,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 232–236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Konac, H. I. Onen, J. Metindir, E. Alp, A. A. Biri, and A. Ekmekci, “Lack of association between -460 C/T and 936 C/T of the vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 exon 4 G/A polymorphisms and ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 453–463, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus