Analytical Cellular Pathology

Analytical Cellular Pathology / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8389765 |

Kristin Mai, Andreas Boldt, Hans-Michael Hau, Michael Kirschfink, Stephan Schiekofer, Frieder Keller, Joachim Beige, Athanassios Giannis, Ulrich Sack, Franz Maximilian Rasche, "Immunological Alterations due to Hemodialysis Might Interfere with Early Complications in Renal Transplantation", Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 2019, Article ID 8389765, 11 pages, 2019.

Immunological Alterations due to Hemodialysis Might Interfere with Early Complications in Renal Transplantation

Academic Editor: Alain Chapel
Received03 Sep 2018
Revised04 Jan 2019
Accepted18 Feb 2019
Published25 Mar 2019


Background. Chronic or intercurrent alterations of the immune system in patients with end-stage renal disease (CKD) and intermittent hemodialysis (CKD5D, HD) have been attributed to an acute rejection of renal allograft. Methods. Leukocyte subsets in flow cytometry, complement activation, and concentrations of TGFβ, sCD30 (ELISA), and interleukins (CBA) of fifteen patients eligible for renal transplantation were analyzed before, during, and after a regular HD. Results. Before HD, the median proportion of CD8+ effector cells, CD8+ CCR5+ effector cells, and HLA-DR+ regulatory T cells as well as the median concentration of soluble CD30 increased and naive CD8+ T cells decreased. During HD, there was a significant decrease in CD4- CD8- T cells () and an increase in CD25+ T cells (), sCD30 (), HLA-DR+ regulatory T cells (), and regulatory T cells (). TGFβ and sCD30 increased significantly over time. The activity of the classical complement pathway started to slightly increase after the first hour of HD and lasted until fifteen minutes after finishing dialysis. The decrease in the functional activity of the alternative pathway was only transient and was followed by a significant increase within 15 minutes after finishing the treatment. Conclusion. HD might interact with the allograft outcome by influencing T cell subsets and activation of the complement system in a biphasic course.

1. Introduction

Today, the dramatic descent of the frequencies of deceased kidney transplantations is determined by a decrease in the willingness for donating a deceased kidney and supported by strict political and legal conditions [14]. Therefore, the elimination of possible interfering or harming events to prevent acute rejections and to achieve an optimal conditioned organ in the highly complicated process of kidney transplantation is the main issue nowadays.

Modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors might contribute to the outcome of kidney graft function in the perioperative period in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [5]. Hemodialysis (HD, CKD5D) immediately in the pre- or perioperative phase is supposed to be associated with a poorer renal allograft outcome due to nonimmunologic and immunologic effects [6]: (i) hemodynamic effects due to hypovolemia, vasoconstriction, and reduced renal plasma flow by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [7], (ii) activation of the immune system due to the contact, shear stress, or hydraulic pressure with the artificial surfaces and membranes [812], or (iii) alterations of the immune system due to chronic uremia [1316].

In this prospective study, we aimed to characterize transient alterations of the innate and the adaptive immune system in response to new biocompatible HD devices, i.e., the newer polynephron membrane, and the permanent impact of chronic uremia (CKD).

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria, Study Protocol, and Materials

Between February and June 2015, fifteen patients were prospectively included who were on regular chronic intermittent HD using a high-flux dialyzer polynephron membrane (Nipro Elisio© 15H, Osaka, Japan) in the outpatient dialysis center, KfH Liebigstraße, Leipzig, Germany.

All patients were eligible for renal transplantation and listed in our transplant program. All patients gave their written informed consent to participate. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (no. 365-14-17112014). Patients under 18 years or unable to give consent, patients with immunodeficiency or acute infection, patients with hemoglobin level below 10 g/dl, and pregnant or breastfeeding women were excluded.

Before, after one hour of, at the end of, and 15 minutes after a regular HD session, a 2.7 ml EDTA tube and a 4 ml whole blood tube were retrieved.

2.2. Blood Cell Count and Flow Cytometry

Two smears of each sample were stained with the kit “Hemacolor Schnellfärbung von Blutausstrichen” by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Subsequently, 100 leukocytes per object plate were analyzed for neutrophils and eosinophils using the microscope with a 100x optical magnification.

To determine the individual amounts of the different leukocytes, whole blood was screened with the panels—(i) “general lymphocyte overview,” (iv) “CD8 cell subsets,” and (v) “regulatory T cells”—as described by Boldt et al. [17] (see Table 1 in [17]).

125 μl whole blood for each panel was incubated with the appropriate mixture of antibodies—for panel (i) 30 μl and for panels (iv) and (v) 25 μl—for 15 minutes. Subsequently, erythrocytes were lysed for 10 minutes using BD FACS Lysing Solution (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). The specimens were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500 g and then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline. Afterwards, cells were analyzed on the BD FACSCanto II Flow Cytometer using the BD FACSDiva Software (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany).

2.3. ELISA and Multiplex Cytometric Bead Array

We used the following enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following the description in the manufacturer’s instructions: Human TGFβ1 Quantikine ELISA (R&D Systems Minneapolis, MN 55413, USA) for the concentration of transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β and Human sCD30 ELISA (BioVendor Inc., Kassel, Germany) for the concentration of soluble CD30 as well as the Wieslab COMPL AP 330 kit and the Wieslab COMPL CP310 kit (Euro-Diagnostica, Malmö, Sweden) for the qualitative determination of alternative as well as classical complement pathway function.

IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were analyzed by a multiplex cytometric bead array using the BD CBA Human Soluble Protein Flex Systems (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as median with range unless indicated otherwise. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Friedman test and the post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Sigma Plot version 11.0, San Jose, California, USA, and IBM SPSS 24, IBM, Armonk, NY 10540 USA). All results with were more closely reviewed. After Bonferroni correction (), all results with were considered to be significant. For comparison, lab internal reference ranges and reference ranges given in the manufacturer’s instructions were used.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population, Leukocyte Count, and Influence of Ultrafiltration Rate on Hemoconcentration

Eight female and seven male patients with a median age of 49 years (min–max: 22 to 66 years) were treated—except for one person with two sessions per week—three times per week with chronic intermittent hemodialysis (Table 1, baseline characteristics).

PatientsSex category (m: male/f: female)Age (years)Blood group1Kidney disease2HbA1c (%)C-reactive protein (g/l)Time on dialysis (months)Cumulative weekly dialysis dose (hours)Anticoagulation3Residual diuresis4Serum creatinine (μmol/l)Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (mmol/l)Anti-Hbs antibodies (mIU/ml)5Number of previous transplantationsPanel reactive antibodies (%)

1m32A (+)25.77.15514.25UFH1.24083612.32114
2f660 (+)05.113.1608UFH1.43141810.22200
3m37A (+)05.3194714UFH1.221112310.59200
4m360 (-)25.2214415LMWH1.110129612.41200
5m46A (+)158.514213LMWH1.590127514.98010
6m61A (+)05.813.62712UFH1.0217787.84200
7m550 (-)04.812.99714LMWH1.541119314.42000
8f22A (+)05.21.24512UFH1.860104911.57200
9f490 (-)04.938815UFH2.14187110.132018
10f57A (+)04.82.74813Ar1.49010619.662025
11m28A (-)04.68.94415UFH1.120146912.652147
12f60B (+)34.54.34515UFH1.8412232.290070
13f53B (+)05.221.811114UFH1.74196411.431178
14f380 (+)38.913312UFH1.2608499.240078
15f56B (+)25.60.96813UFH1.610106913.632185

. 14 Caucasians except patient no. 15 (Vietnamese). Furthermore, all patients received treatment with iron and recombinant erythropoietin. 1Blood group: (-): Rhesus negative; (+): Rhesus positive. 20: analgetics, cisplatine, ischaemia, orellanus, nephrosclerosis, pyelonephritis, CKD5D (unknown reasons), shrinkle kidneys, adult dominant polycystic kidney disease. 1: Alport syndrome; 2: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; 3: diabetes mellitus. 3UFH: unfractionated heparin; LMWH: low molecular weight heparin; Ar: argatroban. 40: ≤500 ml; 1: >500 ml. 50: <10; 1: 10-100; 2: >100.

The median of the ultrafiltration rate (UF) was 2100 ml (mean: 1990 ml, min–max: 0 to 3500 ml). There was no significant increase in eosinophil and neutrophil leukocytes in blood cell count in the Friedman and post hoc Wilcoxon tests in all patients and in separate analysis in regard to the groups with an UF higher or lower than 2100 ml (Tables 2 and 3).

Before dialysisAfter one hour of dialysisAt the end of dialysis15 minutes after end of dialysisReference range

Natural killer cells (% of lymphocytes)
Median (min–max)9.1 (3.7-22.1)7.3 (3-19.8)11.5 (3.8-19)11.6 (3.4-21.6)3-22
Natural killer T cells (% of lymphocytes)
Median (min–max)1.9 (0.4-8.6)1.6 (0.1-5.1)1.9 (0.4-5.9)2.1 (0.3-7.1)2.1-13.7
CD4+ T cells (% of lymphocytes)
Median (min–max)50.9 (36.8-66.5)53.8 (39.5-68.8)52.3 (43.2-64.3)51.7 (42.6-64.5)31-51
CD8+ T cells (% of lymphocytes)
Median (min–max)24.1 (13.6-41.4)22.5 (13.5-27.2)20.8 (11.6-33.8)22.2 (11.8-31)18-35
CD4- CD8- T cells (% of T cells)
Median (min–max)4.2 (1.9-7.7)3.7 (1.6-6.3)3.3 (1.5-5.4)3.4 (1.7-6.5)3-10.2
CD25+ T cells (% of T cells)
Median (min–max)37.4 (24.4-55)38.6 (26.9-54.8)40.6 (27.4-59.1)39.5 (26.8-56.4)22.9-44.9
CD4+ HLA-DR+ T cells (% of CD4+ T cells)
Median (min–max)9.1 (2.8-21.7)9.4 (2.8-21.1)8.5 (3.3-27.7)8.3 (3.4-28.4)5-25
CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells (% of CD8+ T cells)
Median (min–max)23.5 (1.8-55.4)18.6 (1.6-53.3)18 (1.8-59.7)21.9 (1.4-61.4)5-25
Naive CD8+ T cells (% of CD8+ T cells)
Median (min–max)16.5 (8.5-43.7)22.1 (11-53.2)16.6 (6.8-46.4)18.7 (6.8-56.5)28.4-66.7
CD8+ effector cells (% of CD8+ T cells)
Median (min–max)31.2 (15.2-75.3)28.1 (3.7-52.1)29.7 (8.6-62.5)30.9 (10.1-59.3)7.4-24.6
CD8+ CCR5+ effector cells (% of CD8+ T cells)
Median (min–max)9.3 (0.2-29.9)6 (0.7-26)10.4 (1.2-25.6)10.5 (1-31.5)< 5.9
Regulatory T cells (% of T cells)
Median (min–max)6.2 (4.3-9.2)6.9 (4.7-10.1)6.9 (4.6-10)7.2 (4.5-10)2.8-7.2
HLA-DR+ Tregs (% of Tregs)
Median (min–max)25.1 (9.3-38.4)28.2 (9.5-38.5)25.7 (8.6-45.8)26.6 (9.4-46)5.9-18.8
Eosinophils (% of leukocytes)
Median (min–max)4 (1-10)3 (0-7)3 (0-6)2 (0-6)1-3
Neutrophils (% of leukocytes)
Median (min–max)63 (51-77)68 (46-87)68 (52-79)67 (50-87)55-75

Median (min (minimum)–max (maximum)) in percent in fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (FACS) except for neutrophil and eosinophil counts (differential blood count by microscopy). Statistical analysis with nonparametric tests are shown in Table 3.

FriedmanWilcoxon signed-rank test
Period sample1 to 41 and 21 and 31 and 42 and 32 and 41 and 4

Natural killer cells0.0280.0180.5240.5240.1210.0180.389
Natural killer T cells0.0030.0030.080.1940.2680.0580.233
Double-negative T cells<0.001<0.0010.005<0.0010.0770.5240.244
CD4+ T cells0.001<0.0010.1210.1070.1510.0950.599
CD8+ T cells0.010.0050.0350.0550.2080.9780.208
CD25+ T cells0.0060.0420.0180.0260.2290.2290.978
CD4+ HLA-DR+ T cells0.0390.0020.4540.5610.1690.1730.303
CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells0.0160.0010.4320.1690.890.1510.389
CD8+ naive T cells0.165
CD8+ effector cells0.0130.0070.8040.5610.1210.0730.524
CD8+ CCR5+ T cells0.0010.0410.4540.1690.0830.0070.208
Regulatory T cells0.0060.0050.0030.0030.5840.3590.588
HLA-DR+ Tregs0.050.8470.1510.0050.1690.0550.083
Complement CP0.0460.0730.8470.3590.1210.0030.296
Complement AP0.0170.1530.030.6790.4540.0730.003

Blood samples: before (1), after one hour (2), at the end (3), and 15 minutes after the end of HD (4). Statistical analysis with the Friedman test and the post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test. values ≤ 0.003 were considered to be significant according to Bonferroni. CP: complement activation, classical pathway; AP: complement activation, alternative pathway. Not tested due to a nonsignificant Friedman test.
3.2. Panel Reactive Antibodies, Cytokines, and Interleukins

In the Kruskal-Wallis test, there was no significant difference of all mentioned parameters in regard to the panel reactive antibodies (0-5%, 6-85%, and >85%) detected by Luminex technology (Immucor, Dreieich, Germany) routinely before transplantation.

Concentrations of cytokines and interleukins (TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17) were not significantly altered during the study (Tables 24).

Before dialysisAfter one hour of dialysisAt the end of dialysis15 minutes after end of dialysisReference range

TGFβ (ng/ml)
Median (min–max)23.71 (14.4-44.34)13.47 (6.38-22.92)20.58 (16.19-23.25)20.68 (13.24-27.89)18.3-63.4
sCD30 (ng/ml)
Median (min–max)80.1 (45.05-205.88)84.45 (38.18-212.96)88.67 (41.75-212.47)85.96 (55.2-232.18)7.7-60.5
Classical pathway (%)
Median (min–max)106.4 (86.7-124.8)101.7 (80.6-115)104.4 (80.8-114.6)103.9 (85.5-118.5)69-129
Alternative pathway (%)
Median (min–max)86.7 (54.4-115)84.5 (49.8-98.4)78.2 (41.8-94.8)87.9 (63.9-104.8)30-113

Mentioned in the manufacturer’s instructions (Human TGF-β1 Quantikine ELISA, R&D Systems; Human sCD30 ELISA, BioVendor; Wieslab COMPL CP310, Euro-Diagnostica; Wieslab COMPL AP 330, Euro-Diagnostica). min: minimum; max: maximum. Statistical analysis with nonparametric tests are shown in Table 3.
3.3. Leukocyte Subsets in FACS Analysis

The frequency of CD16+ CD56+ natural killer cells decreased temporarily within the first hour of dialysis from 9.1 to 7.3% (ref. 3 to 22%, ). Subsequently, the median increased up to 11.6% () from the second to the fourth sample. The percentage of CD3+ CD16+ natural killer T cells declined significantly analogous (1.9 to 1.6%, ref. 2.1 to 13.7%, ) with no further remarkable increase. Furthermore, a significant constant decline in the median of double-negative T cells was observed over the entire observation period (4.2 to 3.4%, ref. 3 to 10.2%, ).

CD4+ T lymphocytes significantly increased () from the first to the second sampling (50.9 to 53.8%, ref. 31 to 51%, ). However, CD8+ T lymphocytes decreased from 24.1 via 22.5% after one hour (ref. 18 to 35%, ) to 20.8% at the end of the dialysis session (). There were no further remarkable changes over time for both T cell subpopulations.

With respect to the early activation markers, the median of CD25+ T cells increased constantly during the HD (37.4 to 40.6%, ref. 22.9 to 44.9%, ). Similar to CD4+ T cells, T helper cells expressing HLA-DR as a late activation marker increased significantly within the first hour of treatment (9.1 to 9.4%, ref. 5 to 25%, , Figure 1(a)). Interestingly, this increase was accompanied by a decrease in the percentage of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells (23.5 to 18.6%, ref. 5 to 25%, , Figure 1(b)). However, no further significant changes in the frequencies of both subsets could be seen.

The medians of the naive CD8+ T cells ranging from 16.5 to 22.1% were below the reference range 28.4-66.7%. No other relevant alterations for this subpopulation could be found over time. Irrespective of the decline from the first to the second sampling (32.1 to 28.1%, , Figure 1(c)), the percentages of CD8+ effector cells were above the appropriate reference values (7.4 to 24.6%) at any time. The medians of the frequencies of the effector cells expressing the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) were increased (ref. val.: <5.9%) and ranged from 6 to 10.5%. In the first hour, there was a decrease from 9.3 to 6% () followed by an increase from the second to the fourth sample up to 10.5% ().

Furthermore, the percentage of regulatory T cells (Tregs) detected by the expression of surface antigens increased constantly and significantly during the observation time (6.2 to 7.2%, ref. 2.8 to 7.2%, , Figure 1(d)). Besides, the percentages of activated regulatory T cells (HLA-DR+) ranging from 25.1 to 28.2% were above the expected values (ref. 5.9 to 18.8%). Comparing the first with the fourth sample, the median increased characteristically (25.1 to 26.6%, ).

However, in this study there was no significant change of CD19+ B cells, CD4+ CD8+ T cells, CD3+ T cells, CD4+ CD38+ T cells, CD8+ CD38+ T cells, CD8+ central memory T cells, CD8+ effector memory T cells, CD8+ CCR5+ effector memory T cells, TH17 cells, naive Tregs, and regulatory memory T cells.

3.4. TGFβ and sCD30 Levels

TGFβ was in the lower reference range (18.3-63.7 ng/ml) except for the second sample taken after one hour of HD wherein the concentration was significantly decreased from 23.7 to 13.5 ng/ml (). Subsequently, the concentration increased significantly from 13.5 to 20.7 ng/ml over time (, Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 1(e)).

The sCD30 level was always above the reference range (7.7-60.5 ng/ml) revealing a significant increase at each period from the first to the second sample (80.1 to 84.5 ng/ml, ) and from the second to the fourth sample (84.5 to 86 ng/ml, , Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 1(f)).

3.5. Complement System

The levels of complement activity were within the reference ranges for the classical (median min–max: 101.7 to 106.4%, ref. 69 to 129%) as well as the alternative pathway (median min–max: 78.2 to 87.9%, ref. 30 to 113%).

The activity of the classical pathway started to slightly increase after one hour of HD and lasted until fifteen minutes after finishing dialysis (101.7 to 103.9%, ). The decrease in the functional activity of the alternative pathway (indicating complement activation with consumption) during the dialysis session itself (86.7 to 78.2%, ) was only transient and followed by a significant increase up to 87.9% within 15 minutes after finishing the treatment ().

There were no significant differences in statistics if data were calculated for the sample size () excluding patients with former renal transplantation (four with lost graft function—three patients received mycophenolate mofetil 500 twice per day, one patient 5 mg prednisolone—and one patient with graft nephrectomy).

4. Discussion

In this prospective study, we examined for the first time the relevant immunologic effects induced by HD with newer polynephron membranes which may have an impact on the outcome of renal allografts (Figure 2 and Table 5 [1014, 16, 18]).

Alterations during HDLiterature (comments)Membrane

Natural killer cellsFrequencies ↓Grooteman et al. [14]8CM, CA, PS
Present publication (transient)15PN
Natural killer T cellsFrequencies ↓Present publication (transient)15PN
CD4+ T lymphocytesFrequencies ↑Grooteman et al. [14]8CM, CA, PS
Present publication15PN
Szczepańska et al. [15]12
CD8+ T lymphocytesFrequencies =Grooteman et al. [14]8PS
Frequencies ↓Grooteman et al. [14]8CM, CA
Present publication15PN
Number ↓Yoon et al. [13]21
Activation marker (CD25, HLA-DR)Frequencies =Grooteman et al. [14]8CM, CA, PS
Frequencies ↑Present publication (CD25, CD4+ HLA-DR+ T cells)15PN
Frequencies ↓Present publication (CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells)15PN
Regulatory T cellsFrequencies ↑Present publication15PN
Complement activationTransient increase within 15 minutesGirndt et al. [18] (MAC)14PA, H
Transient increase in C3a within 30 minutesRousseau et al. [11]6PS, CA, CU
Varela et al. [12]12CM, H, MC
Hörl et al. [10] (all: CU > S)
Transient increase in C5a within 60 minutesVarela et al. [12]12CM, H, MC
Transient decrease within 60 minutesPresent publication (alternative & classical pathway)15PN
TGFβTransient decrease in concentrationPresent publication15PN
Stefoni et al. [16]155H, PAN, PS
sCD30Concentration ↑Present publication15PN

Abbreviations: : number of dialyzed patients. Membrane: CA: cellulose acetate; CM: cuprammonium; CU: cuprophan; H: Hemophan; MC: modified cellulose; PA: polyamide; PAN: polyacrylnitrile; PN: polynephron; PS: polysulphone. References: Grooteman et al. [14], Szczepańska et al. [15], Yoon et al. [13], Girndt et al. [18], Rousseau et al. [11], Varela et al. [12], Hörl [10], and Stefoni et al. [16].

In regard to lymphocytes, some of the previously described effects could not be found in our patients. Effects could be found in our samples neither for TH1 and TH2 cells nor for TH17 cells [9, 19]. This could be a consequence of our gating strategy, subdividing cells thoroughly and maybe missing some effects this way. Other findings were as expected. We demonstrated an increase in the frequencies of CD8+ effector cells, CD8+ CCR5+ effector cells, HLA-DR+ regulatory T cells, and sCD30 serum concentration as well as a decrease in the frequency of naïve CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood of CKD5D patients eligible for transplantation compared to the reference ranges (Figure 2 and Table 5).

For the first time, we found a biphasic course with either a temporary decrease in natural killer cells, CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells, complement alternative pathway function, and concentration of TGFβ or going along with a temporary increase in CD4+ T cells and CD4+ HLA-DR+ T cells during one single dialysis session. The biphasic course possibly related to biocoating of the membrane regarding the amphiphilic nature of the polyether sulfone membrane material [20] during the first one to two hours might be important for the posttransplantation process. Obviously, aromatic groups are able to interact with several biomolecules containing thiol, hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups to name only a few [21]. The shift of the leukocyte subsets might be related to the cytokine release initiated by the uncoated membrane and could be explained by a release phenomenon from homing compartments of the lymphoid tissue [22].

As previously described [2325], we also observed a significant increase in sCD30 serum concentration and an increase in the frequency of regulatory T cells as well as a decrease in double-negative T cells.

In general, the results presented in the literature concerning the composition of peripheral blood leukocytes in CKD5D patients are contradictory—Daichou et al. reported a higher percentages of CD8+ T cells compared with healthy controls [19], Weimer et al. described a reduced CD8+ T cell counts [26], and Bergström et al. could not find differences in the frequency of CD8+ T cells [27].

At first, we demonstrate a decreased relative proportion of naïve CD8+ T cells and increased frequencies of CD8+ effector cells and HLA-DR+ Tregs in CKD5D patients before HD. Consistent with Litjens et al. [28], we also found increased frequencies of CD8+ CCR5+ T lymphocytes.

We found for the first time a decline of natural killer T cells and of natural killer cells within the first hour of treatment. A reduction of the natural killer cells was only described in cellulose-triacetate membrane [14].

Double-negative T cells (CD4- CD8-) are proinflammatory cells in autoimmune diseases and are associated with the tolerance induction [29]. Lower frequencies are described in uremic patients [30]. In our study, the percentages of CD4- CD8- T cells were already close to the lower reference range before HD and further decreased during HD.

Graft rejection is considered to be the consequence of an adaptive immune response mainly based on T lymphocytes, i.e., CD4+ T cells, against foreign major histocompatibility complexes [31]. However, the role of CD8+ T cells has not been finally clarified [32]. In addition, an increase in activation markers on T cells, CD25 and HLA-DR+, is associated with transplant rejection [33].

In the first hour, we detected an increase in CD4+ T cells and activated CD4+ HLA-DR+ T cells. This increase was accompanied by a decrease in frequencies of CD8+ T cells and CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells. Also, the frequencies of CD3+ T cells expressing the early activation marker CD25 were increased over the whole observation period.

In regard to the CD8+ T cell subsets, there was a decrease in naive T cells during HD. This might be based on activation and subsequent differentiation to effector or memory cells after the contact with the filter. Furthermore, we observed an increase in the frequencies of the CD8+ effector cells and CD8+ effector cells which expresses CCR5 on the cell surface that is crucial for the migration of lymphocytes into the foci of inflammation [34] and is associated with loss of graft function [28]. However, Szczepańska et al. could not show any differences in the frequency of CD8+ CCR5+ T lymphocytes neither in comparison with healthy controls nor in the course of one single dialysis session in children with HD [15].

The percentages of Tregs increased significantly during HD but remained within the normal range. Furthermore, there was a trend to increase in the frequency of the activated Tregs during HD. In summary, there was an increase in cells that in general are considered responsible for graft rejection (CD4+ T cells, CD4+ HLA-DR+ T cells, CD3+ CD25+ T cells, CD8+ effector cells, and CD8+ CCR5+ T cells) but also a slight increase in cells that might induce tolerance (Tregs, HLA-DR+ Tregs).

We also observed a biphasic course with a decrease in the functional activity of the classical complement activation within the first hour of treatment as well as of the alternative pathway during dialysis, indicating a transient but only moderate complement activation. This minor effect results from better biocompatibility of nowadays applied membranes [10, 18]. Therefore, it is not surprising that our data ranged within the reference ranges.

Transforming growth factor beta is associated with the differentiation of T cells to Tregs but also with chronic allograft rejection [16, 35]. As previously described by Stefoni et al. [16], we also found lower TGFβ levels in dialyzed patients—with a marked reduction after 30 minutes of treatment with a return to basal values three hours after finishing dialysis.

Activated T cells cleave sCD30 from the cell membrane [23, 36], and it is supposed that high preoperative [23, 24, 3638] and postoperative [25, 39, 40] concentrations are associated with allograft loss, i.e., in concentrations more than 100 U/ml [2325]. In accordance with the literature [4143], sCD30 concentrations were elevated and further increased during the dialysis session.

It could be suspected that the three physical principles of hemodialysis filtration, convection, osmosis, and diffusion may contribute to the observed changes of immunological parameters in our study. However, the ultrafiltration rate in our patients was comparatively low with a median of two liters [44] and no significant changes in neutrophil or eosinophil cell count were described in our patients. Therefore, significant effects of hemoconcentration on cells and molecules, i.e., macromolecules (>60 kDa: CRP, sCD30, and complement factors) or convection of middle size molecules (500-60000 kDa: TGFβ, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17), could be neglected in our study population and no correction in regard to the ultrafiltration rate was performed [4446]. Elimination of the middle molecules is supplied by the kidneys in patients with renal excretion, i.e., steady state, or by convection in hemodialysis. However, 60 percent of the patients had a residual excretion of more than 500 ml and a significant decrease was not observed generally in all measured molecules with a comparable molecular weight. In contrast, the serum concentration of TGFβ increased during the study.

5. Conclusions

In CKD5D patients of our study, frequencies of CD8+ effector cells, CD8+ CCR5+ effector cells, and HLA-DR+ regulatory T cells were increased and frequencies of naïve CD8+ T cells were decreased. The concentration of sCD30—a biomarker used to predict rejection—was elevated in our patients and further increased during HD. HD increased regulatory T cells, decreased CD4- CD8- T cells, and causes a biphasic course with either a transient decline (natural killer T cells, CD8+ HLA-DR+ T lymphocytes, activation of the complement system, and higher concentration of TGFβ) or a transient increase (CD4+ T lymphocytes, CD4+ HLA-DR+ T lymphocytes). The results of our data suppose that in the first hours after the beginning of the HD intercurrent changes will be remarkable. This normalizes until the fourth hour. Therefore, we argue not to consider short-time dialysis before kidney transplantation. Further studies will be necessary with a detailed focus on the complement system, biocoating, and a follow-up of these patients after renal transplantation.


CCR5:C-C chemokine receptor type 5
CKD5D:Chronic kidney disease stage 5 dialysis
EDTA:Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid
ELISA:Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
PRA:Panel reactive antibodies
ref. range:Reference value
sCD30:Soluble CD30
TGF:Transforming growth factor
Tregs:Regulatory T cells

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request at any time.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (no. 365-14-17112014).

All patients gave their written informed consent to participate.


A minor part of the data presented here has been shown as a poster at the 18th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation and has been published as an abstract in Transplant International 30 (Suppl. 2), 524 (2017).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

KM, US, and FMR participated in the data analysis, interpretation, and designing and writing of the manuscript. AB, HMH, MK, SS, FK, JB, and AG participated in the data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. Ulrich Sack and Franz Maximilian Rasche contributed equally to this work.


We thank Ms. Heike Knaack (IKIT, University of Leipzig) and Ms. Katrin Bauer (IKIT, University of Leipzig) for their excellent technical assistance. We acknowledge the support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and Universität Leipzig within the program of Open Access Publishing.


  1. “Renal transplantation bill,” British Medical Journal, vol. 1, p. 777, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Tong, J. R. Chapman, G. Wong, and J. C. Craig, “Perspectives of transplant physicians and surgeons on reimbursement, compensation, and incentives for living kidney donors,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 622–632, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Zhang, G. Hua, X. Zhang, R. Tong, X. Du, and Z. Li, “Regulatory T cells/T‐helper cell 17 functional imbalance in uraemic patients on maintenance haemodialysis: a pivotal link between microinflammation and adverse cardiovascular events,” Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Barnieh, S. Klarenbach, J. S. Gill, T. Caulfield, and B. Manns, “Attitudes toward strategies to increase organ donation: views of the general public and health professionals,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1956–1963, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Lebranchu, C. Baan, L. Biancone et al., “Pretransplant identification of acute rejection risk following kidney transplantation,” Transplant International, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 129–138, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. A. van Loo, R. C. Vanholder, P. R. Bernaert, F. E. Vermassen, M. van der Vennet, and N. H. Lameire, “Pretransplantation hemodialysis strategy influences early renal graft function,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 473–481, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  7. N. K. Aulakh, K. Garg, A. Bose, B. S. Aulakh, H. S. Chahal, and G. S. Aulakh, “Influence of hemodynamics and intra-operative hydration on biochemical outcome of renal transplant recipients,” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 174–179, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Amore and R. Coppo, “Immunological basis of inflammation in dialysis,” Nephrology, Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 17, Supplement 8, no. 90008, pp. 16–24, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Libetta, V. Sepe, and A. D. Canton, “Bio-incompatibility and Th2 polarization during regular dialysis treatment,” International Reviews of Immunology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 608–625, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. H. Hörl, “Hemodialysis membranes: interleukins, biocompatibility, and middle molecules,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 13, Supplement 1, pp. S62–S71, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  11. Y. Rousseau, M. P. Carreno, J. L. Poignet, M. D. Kazatchkine, and N. Haeffner-Cavaillon, “Dissociation between complement activation, integrin expression and neutropenia during hemodialysis,” Biomaterials, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 1959–1967, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. P. Varela, P. L. Kimmel, T. M. Phillips, G. J. Mishkin, S. Q. Lew, and J. P. Bosch, “Biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes: interrelations between plasma complement and cytokine levels,” Blood Purification, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 370–379, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J.-W. Yoon, S. Gollapudi, M. V. Pahl, and N. D. Vaziri, “Naïve and central memory T-cell lymphopenia in end-stage renal disease,” Kidney International, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 371–376, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. P. C. Grooteman, M. J. Nubé, J. van Limbeek, M. Schoorl, and A. J. van Houte, “Lymphocyte subsets in dialyser eluates: a new parameter of bioincompatibility?” Nephrology, Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1073–1078, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Szczepańska, Ł. Sędek, I. Makulska et al., “Expression of chemokine receptors on peripheral blood T cells in children with chronic kidney disease,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, Article ID 536894, 8 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Stefoni, G. Cianciolo, G. Donati et al., “Low TGF-β1 serum levels are a risk factor for atherosclerosis disease in ESRD patients,” Kidney International, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 324–335, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Boldt, S. Borte, S. Fricke et al., “Eight‐color immunophenotyping of T‐, B‐, and NK‐cell subpopulations for characterization of chronic immunodeficiencies,” Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, vol. 86, pp. 191–206, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Girndt, O. Heisel, and H. Kohler, “Influence of dialysis with polyamide vs haemophan haemodialysis on monokines and complement activation during a 4-month long-term study,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 676–682, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Daichou, S. Kurashige, S. Hashimoto, and S. Suzuki, “Characteristic cytokine products of Th1 and Th2 cells in hemodialysis patients,” Nephron, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 237–245, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y.-B. Wang, K.-H. Shi, H.-L. Jiang, and Y.-K. Gong, “Significantly reduced adsorption and activation of blood components in a membrane oxygenator system coated with crosslinkable zwitterionic copolymer,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 40, pp. 153–161, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. R. Forbes, S. K. Sinha, H. K. Ganguly et al., “Insights into thiol–aromatic interactions: a stereoelectronic basis for S–H/π interactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 1842–1855, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. Alvarez, R. Pulido, M. R. Campanero, V. Paraiso, M. O. de Landázuri, and F. Sánchez-Madrid, “Differentially regulated cell surface expression of leukocyte adhesion receptors on neutrophils,” Kidney International, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 899–905, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Giannoli, M. C. Bonnet, G. Perrat et al., “High pretransplantation soluble CD30 levels: impact in renal transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2574-2575, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Süsal, S. Pelzl, B. Döhler, and G. Opelz, “Identification of highly responsive kidney transplant recipients using pretransplant soluble CD30,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1650–1656, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. L. Langan, L. P. Park, T. L. Hughes et al., “Post-transplant HLA class II antibodies and high soluble CD30 levels are independently associated with poor kidney graft survival,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 847–856, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Weimer, S. Zipperle, V. Daniel, S. Carl, G. Staehler, and G. Opelz, “Pretransplant CD4 helper function and interleukin 10 response predict risk of acute kidney graft rejection,” Transplantation, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1606–1614, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Bergström, A. L. Joly, P. Seiron et al., “Immunological profiling of haemodialysis patients and young healthy individuals with implications for clinical regulatory T cell sorting,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 318–324, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. H. R. Litjens, C. J. van Druningen, and M. G. H. Betjes, “Progressive loss of renal function is associated with activation and depletion of naive T lymphocytes,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 83–91, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. F. D’Acquisto and T. Crompton, “CD3+CD4CD8 (double negative) T cells: saviours or villains of the immune response?” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 333–340, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. Vacher-Coponat, C. Brunet, L. Lyonnet et al., “Natural killer cell alterations correlate with loss of renal function and dialysis duration in uraemic patients,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1406–1414, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. Sawitzki, S. Schlickeiser, P. Reinke, and H.-D. Volk, “Monitoring tolerance and rejection in organ transplant recipients,” Biomarkers, vol. 16, no. sup1, pp. S42–S50, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. Bueno and J. O. M. Pestana, “The role of CD8+ T cells during allograft rejection,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1247–1258, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Avihingsanon, N. Ma, M. Pavlakis et al., “On the intraoperative molecular status of renal allografts after vascular reperfusion and clinical outcomes,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1542–1548, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. Fukada, Y. Sobao, H. Tomiyama, S. Oka, and M. Takiguchi, “Functional expression of the chemokine receptor CCR5 on virus epitope-specific memory and effector CD8+ T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 2225–2232, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. M. Alvarez, G. Opelz, L. F. Garcia, and C. Süsal, “Expression of regulatory T-cell-related molecule genes and clinical outcome in kidney transplant recipients,” Transplantation, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 857–863, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Pelzl, G. Opelz, M. Wiesel et al., “Soluble CD30 as a predictor of kidney graft outcome,” Transplantation, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. Shooshtarizadeh, I. Tehran, A. Mohammadali, S. Ossareh, and Y. Ataipour, “Relation between pretransplant serum levels of soluble CD30 and acute rejection during the first 6 months after a kidney transplant,” Experimental and Clinical Transplantation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–233, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. E. Karahan, Y. Caliskan, K. Ozdilli et al., “High soluble CD30 levels and associated anti-HLA antibodies in patients with failed renal allografts,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 547–552, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Pelzl, G. Opelz, V. Daniel, M. Wiesel, and C. S??sal, “Evaluation of posttransplantation soluble CD30 for diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection,” Transplantation, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 421–423, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Kamali, M. A. Abbasi, B. Farokhi et al., “Posttransplant soluble CD30 as a predictor of acute renal allograft rejection,” Experimental and Clinical Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 237–240, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  41. R. Rajakariar, N. Jivanji, M. Varagunam et al., “High pre-transplant soluble CD30 levels are predictive of the grade of rejection,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1922–1925, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. Altermann, G. Schlaf, A. Rothhoff, and B. Seliger, “High variation of individual soluble serum CD30 levels of pre-transplantation patients: sCD30 a feasible marker for prediction of kidney allograft rejection?” Nephrology, Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 2795–2799, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. Nakao, Y. Nagake, A. Okamoto, H. Ichikawa, M. Yamamura, and H. Makino, “Serum levels of soluble CD26 and CD30 in patients on hemodialysis,” Nephron, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 215–221, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. Yamamoto, M. M. Nascimento, S. Y. Hayashi et al., “Changes in circulating biomarkers during a single hemodialysis session,” Hemodialysis International, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. Bergstrom and B. Wehle, “No change in corrected β2-microglobulin concentration after cuprophane haemodialysis,” The Lancet, vol. 329, no. 8533, pp. 628-629, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. Schneditz, C. Putz-Bankuti, W. Ribitsch, and G. Schilcher, “Correction of plasma concentrations for effects of hemoconcentration or hemodilution,” ASAIO Journal, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 160–162, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Kristin Mai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.