Advances in Decision Sciences

Advances in Decision Sciences / 2006 / Article
Special Issue

10th Anniversary Special Issue

View this Special Issue

Open Access

Volume 2006 |Article ID 031089 | https://doi.org/10.1155/JAMDS/2006/31089

D. J. Best, J. C. W. Rayner, O. Thas, "Nonparametric analysis of blocked ordered categories data: some examples revisited", Advances in Decision Sciences, vol. 2006, Article ID 031089, 9 pages, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1155/JAMDS/2006/31089

Nonparametric analysis of blocked ordered categories data: some examples revisited

Received05 Oct 2005
Revised12 May 2006
Accepted15 May 2006
Published01 Aug 2006

Abstract

Nonparametric analysis for general block designs can be given by using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) statistics. We demonstrate this with four examples and note that several well-known nonparametric statistics are special cases of CMH statistics.

References

  1. A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2nd edition, 2002. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  2. M. Alvo and P. Cabilio, “Testing ordered alternatives in the presence of incomplete data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, no. 431, pp. 1015–1024, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  3. R. L. Anderson, “Use of contingency tables in the analysis of consumer preference studies,” Biometrics, vol. 15, pp. 582–590, 1959. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. V. Bradley, Distribution-Free Statistical Tests, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1968. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  5. W. G. Cochran, “Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests,” Biometrics, vol. 10, pp. 417–451, 1954. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  6. C. S. Davis, Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements, Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, New York, 2002. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  7. M. M. Desu and D. Raghavarao, Nonparametric Statistical Methods for Complete and Censored Data, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida, 2004. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  8. M. Friedman, “The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 32, no. 200, pp. 675–701, 1937. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. IMSL, “IMSL User's Guide-Mathematical & Statistical Functions,” Houston: Visual Numerics. 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  10. W. H. Kruskal and W. A. Wallis, “Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 47, no. 260, pp. 583–621, 1952. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  11. N. Mantel and W. Haenszel, “Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 22, pp. 719–748, 1959. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Q. McNemar, “Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages,” Psychometrika, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 1947. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Meilgaard, G. V. Civille, and B. T. Carr, Sensory Evaluation Techniques, CRC Press, Florida, 3rd edition, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  14. E. B. Page, “Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: a significance test for linear ranks,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 58, no. 301, pp. 216–230, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  15. S. C. Pearce, “Supplemented balance,” Biometrika, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 263–271, 1960. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  16. J. C. W. Rayner and D. J. Best, A Contingency Table Approach to Nonparametric Testing, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. C. W. Rayner, D. J. Best, P. B. Brockhoff, and G. D. Rayner, Nonparametrics for Sensory Science: A More Informative Approach, Blackwell, Iowa, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. Stuart, “A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification,” Biometrika, vol. 42, no. 3-4, pp. 412–416, 1955. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  19. F. Yates, “The analysis of contingency tables with groupings based on quantitative characters,” Biometrika, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 176–181, 1948. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH

Copyright © 2006 D. J. Best et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

107 Views | 398 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.