Table of Contents
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences
Volume 2006, Article ID 58232, 26 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JAMDS/2006/58232

Student absenteeism in engineering colleges: Evaluation of alternatives using AHP

1Center for Mathematical Sciences, Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Vignan Hills, Deshmukhi, Nalgonda 508 284, Andhra Pradesh, India
2Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada 533 003, Andhra Pradesh, India
3Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India

Received 3 January 2006; Revised 29 August 2006; Accepted 24 September 2006

Copyright © 2006 P. Kousalya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. A. Boloz and D. C. Lincoln, “Combating student absenteeism: strategies for raising attendance and achievement,” Journal of American Indian Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 25–30, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Day, B. Elliot, and A. Kington, “Reform, standards and teacher identity: challenges of sustaining commitment,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 563–577, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Department of Education, “Chronic Student absenteeism 2002-2003,” Florida Information Notes, March issue, Series 2004-13F (2004).
  4. Director of Health Services, “Student Absenteeism Due to Illness or Injury,” University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2005.
  5. J. S. Dyer, “A clarification of “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 274–275, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. S. Dyer, “Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 249–275, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. T. Garvin, “Politics department blames student absenteeism for high failure rates,” Observer, vol. 11, no. 4, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. H. Gorman, J. Kim, and A. Schimmelbusch, “The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 143–165, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. T. Harker, “The art of science and decision-making: the analytic hierarchy process,” in The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies, vol. 79, pp. 3–36, Springer, New York, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  10. P. T. Harker and L. G. Vargas, “Reply to “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” by J. S. Dyer,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 269–273, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Islam, On some aspects of the analytic hierarchy process, Doctoral thesis, IIT, Kharagpur, 1995.
  12. P. Kousalya, “Student absenteeism in engineering colleges: a survey,” Working Report, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, Andhra Pradesh, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. National Center for Educational Statistics, “Principals' Perceptions of Discipline Issues in Their Schools, Fast Response Survey System,” 1998, http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/98030/4.asp. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Pearce, “An analysis of student absenteeism in first year biology students,” Project Report, Center for Bioscience, The Higher Education Academy, Leeds, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  15. G. E. Philips-Wren, E. D. Hahn, and G. A. Forgionne, “A multiple-criteria framework for evaluation of decision support systems,” Omega, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 323–332, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. T. R. Prabhu, Technology choice: methodology and a case study, Doctoral thesis, IIT, Kharagpur, 1997.
  17. T. R. Prabhu and K. VizayaKumar, “Fuzzy hierarchical decision making (FHDM): a methodology for technology choice,” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, vol. 9, no. 5-6, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. R. Prabhu and K. VizayaKumar, “Technology choice using FHDM: a case of iron-making technology,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 209–222, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Ramanathan and L. S. Ganesh, “Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 249–265, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  20. K. B. Reddy, N. H. Ayachit, and M. K. Venkatesha, “A theoretical method for performance evaluation of technical institutions-analytic hierarchy process approach,” The Indian Journal of Technical Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  21. T. L. Saaty, “Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. T. L. Saaty, “An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytical hierarchy process”,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  24. T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  25. S. Silverstein, “Computer Classes Spur Student Absenteeism,” Los Angeles Times, January 2006.
  26. F. Timmins and M. Kaliszer, “Attitudes to absenteeism among diploma nursing students in Ireland—an exploratory descriptive survey,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 578–588, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Yue, B. Chen, and M.-C. Wang, “Generating ranking groups in the analytical hierarchy process,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 190–201, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  28. Office of Educational Research and Improvement Survey on disciplinary issues among students, U.S. Department of Education (1997).