Table of Contents
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences
Volume 2009, Article ID 512356, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/512356
Research Article

Improving EWMA Plans for Detecting Unusual Increases in Poisson Counts

1CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, Locked Bag 17, North Ryde NSW 1670, Australia
2Centre for Epidemiology and Research, NSW Health Department, Locked Mail Bag 961, North Sydney NSW 2059, Australia

Received 11 November 2008; Revised 27 April 2009; Accepted 19 June 2009

Academic Editor: Chin Lai

Copyright © 2009 R. S. Sparks et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. H. Woodall, “The use of control charts in health-care and public-health surveillance,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 89–104, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. L. Buckeridge, H. Burkom, M. Campbell, W. R. Hogan, and A. W. Moore, “Algorithms for rapid outbreak detection: a research synthesis,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 99–113, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. J. M. Lucas and M. S. Saccucci, “Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. With discussion,” Technometrics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. D. Lambert and C. Liu, “Adaptive thresholds: monitoring streams of network counts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 101, no. 473, pp. 78–88, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. W. Zucchini and I. L. MacDonald, “Illustrations of the use of pseudo-residuals in assessing the fit of a model,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling, H. Friedl, A. Berghold, and G. Kauermann, Eds., pp. 409–416, Graz, Austria, 1999.
  6. T. Burr, T. Graves, R. Klamann, S. Michalak, R. Picard, and N. Hengartner, “Accounting for seasonal patterns in syndromic surveillance data for outbreak detection,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 6, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. R. S. Sparks, “CUSUM charts for signalling varying location shifts,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. O. Grigg and D. Spiegelhalter, “A simple risk-adjusted exponentially weighted moving average,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 102, no. 477, pp. 140–152, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. G. Capizzi and G. Masarotto, “An adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart,” Technometrics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. H. B. Nembhard and M. S. Kao, “Adaptive forecast-based monitoring for dynamic systems,” Technometrics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 208–219, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. R. A. Parker, “Analysis of surveillance data with Poisson regression: a case study,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 285–294, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  12. B. Miller, H. Kassenborg, W. Dunsmuir et al., “Syndromic surveillance for influenzalike illness in an ambulatory care network,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1806–1811, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. I. Kleinschmidt, B. L. Sharp, G. P. Y. Clarke, B. Curtis, and C. Fraser, “Use of generalized linear mixed models in the spatial analysis of small-area malaria incidence rates in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 153, no. 12, pp. 1213–1221, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Wang, M. F. Ramoni, K. D. Mandl, and P. Sebastiani, “Factors affecting automated syndromic surveillance,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 269–278, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. C. P. Farrington, N. J. Andrews, A. D. Beale, and M. A. Catchpole, “A statistical algorithm for the early detection of outbreaks of infectious disease,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 547–563, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. B. J. Cowling, I. O. L. Wong, L.-M. Ho, S. Riley, and G. M. Leung, “Methods for monitoring influenza surveillance data,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1314–1321, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. M. A. Stoto, M. Schonlau, and L. T. Mariano, “Syndromic surveillance: is it worth the effort?” Chance, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. A.-V. Kaninda, F. Belanger, R. Lewis et al., “Effectiveness of incidence thresholds for detection and control of meningococcal meningitis epidemics in northern Togo,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 933–940, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. S. Sparks, C. Carter, P. L. Graham et al., “A strategy for understanding the sources of variation in syndromic surveillance for bioterrorism and public health incidence,” to appear in IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering.
  20. L. Shu and W. Jiang, “A Markov chain model for the adaptive CUSUM control chart,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  21. O. N. Bjornstad, B. F. Finkenstadt, and B. T. Grenfell, “Dynamics of measles epidemics: estimating scaling of transmission rates using a time series SIR model,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 169–184, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Christensen, H. Melgaard, J. Iwersen, and P. Thyregod, “Environmental monitoring based on a hierarchical Poisson-Gamma model,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 275–285, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  23. P. Graham and R. S. Sparks, “Adaptation of generalized linear models to diseases that occur infrequently (mean rate 1–15 counts/day),” CSIRO Technical Paper CMIS 06/34, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  24. A. Zeileis, “A unified approach to structural change tests based on ML scores, F statistics, and OLS residuals,” Econometric Reviews, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 445–466, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. A. Zeileis, “Implementing a class of structural change tests: an econometric computing approach,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2987–3008, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. A. Zeileis and C. Kleiber, “Validating multiple structural change models—a case study,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 685–690, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet