Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 472809, 26 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/472809
Research Article

Modeling Sequential Searches with Ancillary Target Dependencies

Naval Undersea Warfare Center, 1176 Howell Street, Newport, RI 02841, USA

Received 15 May 2009; Revised 7 October 2009; Accepted 23 November 2009

Academic Editor: Ron McGarvey

Copyright © 2010 Thomas A. Wettergren and John G. Baylog. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. O. Koopman, Search and Screening: General Principles with Historical Application, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1980. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. S. J. Benkoski, M. G. Monticino, and J. R. Weisinger, “A survey of the search theory literature,” Naval Research Logistics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 469–494, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Nakai, “Search models with continuous effort under various criteria,” Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 335–352, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. A. R. Washburn, Search and Detection, INFORMS, Linthicum, Md, USA, 4th edition, 2002.
  5. L. D. Stone, Theory of Optimal Search, ORSA Books, Arlington, Va, USA, 2nd edition, 1989.
  6. K. Iida, Studies on the Optimal Search Plan, vol. 70 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1992. View at MathSciNet
  7. K. E. Trummel and J. R. Weisinger, “The complexity of the optimal searcher path problem,” Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 324–327, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. M. Kress, R. Szechtman, and J. S. Jones, “Efficient employment of non-reactive sensors,” Military Operations Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 45–57, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Grace, “Brownian Reber search theory for the Advanced Unmanned Search System (AUSS),” Tech. Rep. 1532, Naval Command Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1992, http://www.dtic.mil/. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. A. Kish, D. R. Jacques, and M. Pachter, “Optimal control of sensor threshold for autonomous wide-area-search munitions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1239–1248, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Cozzolino, “Sequential search for an unknown number of objects of nonuniform size,” Operations Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 293–308, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Luss, “Multiperiod search models for an unknown number of valuable objects,” Decision Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 430–438, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Mangel and C. W. Clark, “Uncertainty, search, and information in fisheries,” Journal du Conseil—Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. V. Kalbaugh, “Optimal search density for a stationary target among stationary false targets,” Operations Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 310–318, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. H. R. Richardson and B. Belkin, “Optimal search with uncertain sweep width,” Operations Research, vol. 20, pp. 764–784, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. I. Yan and G. L. Blankenship, “Search for randomly moving targets I: estimation,” in Proceedings of the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS '87), pp. 786–791, Washington, DC, USA, 1987. View at Scopus
  17. T. H. Chung and J. W. Burdick, “Multi-agent probabilistic search in a sequential decision-theoretic framework,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '08), pp. 146–151, Pasadena, Calif, USA, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. V. Ling and K. W. Lim, “Receding horizon recursive state estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1750–1753, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. S. I. Roumeliotis and G. A. Bekey, “Bayesian estimation and Kalman filtering: a unified framework for mobile robot localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '00), vol. 3, pp. 2985–2992, San Francisco, Calif, USA, April 2000. View at Scopus
  20. E.-M. Wong, F. Bourgault, and T. Furukawa, “Multi-vehicle Bayesian search for multiplelost targets,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '03), pp. 3169–3174, Barcelona, Spain, 2003.
  21. T. Furukawa, F. Bourgault, B. Lavis, and H. F. Durrant-Whyte, “Recursive Bayesian search-and-tracking using coordinate UAVs for lost targets,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '06), pp. 2521–2526, Orlando, Fla, USA, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. G. Baylog and T. A. Wettergren, “Search path evaluation incorporating object placement structure,” Tech. Rep. NUWC-NPT 11845, 2007, http://www.dtic.mil/. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1991.
  24. T. A. Wettergren, “Performance of search via track-before-detect for distributed sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 314–325, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus