Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2011, Article ID 608324, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/608324
Research Article

A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Supply Chain Efficiency

Department of Applied Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Rasht 41648-13955, Iran

Received 18 August 2011; Accepted 7 December 2011

Academic Editor: Stefanka Chukova

Copyright © 2011 Alireza Amirteimoori and Leila Khoshandam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. A. Amirteimoori and A. Emrouznejad, “Flexible measures in production process: a DEA-based approach,” RAIRO Operations Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Amirteimoori and S. Kordrostami, “Production planning: a DEA-based approach,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 56, no. 1–4, pp. 369–376, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Amirteimoori, “An extended transportation problem: a DEA-based approach,” Central European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 513–521, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, Handbook of Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Mass, USA, 2007.
  6. C. A. Weber and A. Desai, “Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 142–155, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Easton, D. J. Murphy, and J. N. Pearson, “Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 123–134, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Talluri and R. C. Baker, “A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 544–558, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Liang, F. Yang, W. D. Cook, and J. Zhu, “DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 145, pp. 35–49, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. Y. Chen, L. Liang, and F. Yang, “A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 145, pp. 5–13, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. Y. J. Chen, “Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 9, pp. 1651–1670, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Färe and S. Grosskopf, “Network DEA,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Feng, D. Wu, L. Liang, G. Bi, and D. D. Wu, “Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 195–211, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus