Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 276584, 24 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/276584
Review Article

State-of-the-Art Prescriptive Criteria Weight Elicitation

Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Forum 100, 164 40 Kista, Sweden

Received 24 March 2012; Revised 24 October 2012; Accepted 13 November 2012

Academic Editor: Graham Wood

Copyright © 2012 Mona Riabacke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. G. March, A Primer on Decision Making, How Decisions Happen, The Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  2. Z. Shapira, Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective, Russel Sage Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  3. H. Simon, Administrative Behaviour, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1976.
  4. H. Raiffa, Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty, Random House, New York, NY, USA, 1968.
  5. R. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  6. H. Simon, “Decision making and problem solving,” in Research Briefings 1986: Report of the Research Briefing Panel on Decision Making and Problem Solving by the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. G. March and H. Simon, Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1958.
  8. R. Cyert and J. March, A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1963.
  9. J. G. March and J. Olsen, Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway, 1976.
  10. M. Porter, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  11. S. Hart, “An integrative framework for strategy-making processes,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 327–351, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press, 2nd edition, 1947.
  13. L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1954.
  14. R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
  15. J. Morrow and M. Hitt, “Rational and political models of strategic decision making,” in Handbook of Strategic Management, J. Rabin, G. Miller, and W. B. Hildreth, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Simon, Models of Man: Social and Rational, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
  17. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty,” Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124–1131, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Simon, Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1945.
  19. C. Kirkwood, Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA, 1997.
  20. D. Bell, H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky, Decision Making—Descriptive, Normative and Prescriptive Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.
  21. J. Wallenius, J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, S. Zionts, and K. Deb, “Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead,” Management Science, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1336–1349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. French and D. L. Xu, “Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 65–80, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  23. C. Banville, M. Landry, J. M. Martel, and C. Boulaire, “A stakeholder approach to MCDA,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 15–32, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Brown, “Making decision research useful—not just rewarding,” Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 162–173, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Keeney, “Making better decision makers,” Decision Analysis, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 193–204, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. V. Brown, “Toward a prescriptive science and technology of decision aiding,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 465–483, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–292, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  29. G. Loomes and R. Sugden, “Regret Theory: an Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal, vol. 92, no. 368, pp. 805–824, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. Bell, “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research, no. 5, pp. 961–981, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  31. P. Slovic, B. Fischoff, and S. Lichtenstein, “Response mode, framing, and information-processing effects in risk assessment,” in Decision Making—Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, D. Bell, H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. G. March, “Understanding how decisions happen in organizations,” in Organizational Decision Making, Z. Shapira, Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  33. R. Keeney, “On the foundations of prescriptive decision analysis,” in Utility Theories: Measurement and Applications, W. Edwards, Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  34. S. French and D. Rios Insua, Statistical Decision Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  35. D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioural Research, Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  36. R. Brown and A. Vari, “Towards a research agenda for prescriptive decision science: the normative tempered by the descriptive,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 80, no. 1–3, pp. 33–47, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. French, “An introduction to decision theory and prescriptive decision analysis,” IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. W. Fischer, “Prescriptive decision science: problems and opportunities,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 489–497, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Danielson, “Generalized evaluation in decision analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 442–449, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Keeney, Value-Focused Thinking—A Path to Creative Decisionmaking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992.
  41. L. D. Phillips, “A theory of requisite decision models,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 56, no. 1–3, pp. 29–48, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. V. Belton and T. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Lancaster, UK, 2002.
  43. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  44. B. Roy, Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.
  45. J. P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228–238, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. A. Bana e Costa and J. C. Vansnick, “MACBETH—an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 489–500, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. V. Belton and S. Vickers, VISA Software Package, Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, 1988.
  49. S. Barclay, Hiview Software Package, Decision Analysis Unit, London School of Economics, 1984.
  50. M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, J. Johansson, and A. Larsson, “The DecideIT decision tool,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (ISIPTA '03), J.-M Bernard, T. Seidenfeld, and M. Zaffalon, Eds., pp. 204–217, Carleton Scientific, Lugano, Switzerland, 2003.
  51. A. Jiménez, S. Ríos-Insua, and A. Mateos, “A generic multi-attribute analysis system,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1081–1101, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. “Expert choice,” 2010, http://www.expertchoice.com.
  53. R. Hämäläinen and H. Lauri, HIPRE 3+. Computer Software, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, 1995.
  54. J. Geldermann and K. Zhang, “Software review: Decision Lab 2000,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 317–323, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  55. J. Fox, “Probability, logic and the cognitive foundations of rational belief,” Journal of Applied Logic, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 197–224, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. P. H. Garthwaite, J. B. Kadane, and A. O'Hagan, “Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 100, no. 470, pp. 680–700, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. de Finetti, “Probability: interpretations,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, pp. 496–505, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  58. G. Wright and P. Ayton, Eds., Subjective Probability, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  59. R. T. Clemen, Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1996.
  60. J. L. Corner and P. D. Corner, “Characteristics of decisions in decision analysis practice,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 304–314, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. R. M. Hogarth, “Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 70, pp. 271–289, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  62. M. G. Morgan and M. Henrion, Uncertainty—A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  63. T. S. Wallsten and D. V. Budescu, “Encoding subjective probabilities: a psychological and psychometric review,” Management Science, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 151–173, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  64. E. M. Johnson and G. P. Huber, “The technology of Utility Assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 311–325, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. P. H. Farquhar, “Utility assessment methods,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1283–1300, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” Science, vol. 211, no. 4481, pp. 453–458, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. A. Lenert and J. R. Treadwell, “Effects on preferences of violations of procedural invariance,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 473–481, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Lichtenstein and P. Slovic, Eds., The Construction of Preference, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  69. O. Larichev, “Cognitive validity in design of decision-aiding techniques,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 127–128, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  70. F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “The efficacy of SMARTER—simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 23–26, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. K. Borcherding, T. Eppel, and D. von Winterfeldt, “Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement,” Management Science, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1603–1619, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  72. M. Pöyhönen and R. P. Hämäläinen, “On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 569–585, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. Mustajoki, R. P. Hämäläinen, and A. Salo, “Decision support by interval SMART/SWING—incorporating imprecision in the SMART and SWING methods,” Decision Sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 317–339, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. P. A. Bottomley and J. R. Doyle, “A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best,” Omega, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 553–560, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. P. A. Bottomley, J. R. Doyle, and R. H. Green, “Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: direct rating versus point allocation,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 508–513, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. W. Edwards, “How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 326–340, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. G. W. Fischer, “Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multiattribute value models,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 252–266, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. W. Edwards and F. H. Barron, “SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 306–325, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. R. von Nitzsch and M. Weber, “The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multiattribute utility measurements,” Management Science, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 937–943, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  80. J. Beattie and J. Baron, “Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 571–585, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. J. P. Monat, “The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis,” Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 492–508, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. Jia, G. W. Fischer, and J. S. Dyer, “Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 85–105, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. W. G. Stillwell, D. A. Seaver, and W. Edwards, “A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 62–77, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. F. H. Barron, “Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 80, no. 1–3, pp. 91–103, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. Riabacke, M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, and A. Larsson, “A prescriptive approach for eliciting imprecise weight statements in an MCDA process,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT '09), Venice, Italy, October 2009.
  86. M. W. Merkhofer, “Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: methodology, experiences, and insights,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 741–752, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. P. Walley, Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1991.
  88. M. Danielson and L. Ekenberg, “Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 808–816, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. Jiménez, S. Ríos-Insua, and A. Mateos, “A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. L. Keeney, “Decision analysis: an overview,” Operational Research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 803–838, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. D. A. Wehrung, K. R. MacCrimmon, and K. M. Brothers, “Utility measures: comparisons of domain stability, and equivalence procedures,” Tech. Rep. 603, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  92. N. Brunsson, The Organization of Hipocracy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1989.
  93. A. Tversky, S. Sattath, and P. Slovic, “Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice,” Psychological Review, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 371–384, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. P. Slovic, “Information processing, situation specificity, and the generality of risk-taking behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 128–134, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein, “Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 330–344, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Rational choice and framing of decisions,” Journal of Business, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 252–278, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  97. H. Wang, D. Dash, and M. J. Druzdzel, “A method for evaluating elicitation schemes for probabilistic models,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. L. A. Lenert, C. D. Sherbourne, and V. Reyna, “Utility elicitation using single-item questions compared with a computerized interview,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. R. T. Clemen and R. L. Winkler, “Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis,” Risk Analysis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 187–203, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. Fox, “On the necessity of probability: reasons to believe and grounds for doubt,” in Subjective Probability, G. Wright and P. Ayton, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  101. M. Pöyhönen, On attribute weighting in value trees [doctoral thesis], Helsinki University of Technology, 1998.
  102. C. S. Spetzler and C. A. S. Stael von Holstein, “Probability encoding in decision analysis,” Management Science, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 340–358, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. K. S. Park, “Mathematical programming models for characterizing dominance and potential optimality when multicriteria alternative values and weights are simultaneously incomplete,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics A, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 601–614, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. A. A. Salo, “Interactive decision aiding for group decision support,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 134–149, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “Decision quality using ranked attribute weights,” Management Science, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1515–1523, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. K. Katsikopoulos and C. H. Lan, “Herbert Simon's spell on judgment and decision making,” Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 722–732, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  107. T. J. Stewart, “A critical survey on the status of Multiple Criteria Decision Making theory and practice,” Omega, vol. 20, no. 5-6, pp. 569–586, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. J. Hülle, R. Kaspar, and K. Möller, “Multiple criteria decision-making in management accounting and control-state of the art and research perspectives based on a Bibliometric Study,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 18, no. 5-6, pp. 253–265, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  109. K. Katsikopoulos and B. Fasolo, “New tools for decision analysts,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics A, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 960–967, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  110. O. I. Larichev, D. L. Olson, H. M. Moshkovich, and A. J. Mechitov, “Numerical vs cardinal measurements in multiattribute decision making: how exact is enough?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. C. Nemeth and G. Klein, “The naturalistic decision making perspective,” Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. A. Posch, A. Agarwal, and P. Strachan, “Managing industrial symbiosis (IS) networks,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 421–427, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  113. H. Kunz and T. Schaaf, “General and specific formalization approach for a Balanced Scorecard: an expert system with application in health care,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1947–1955, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. R. Brown, Environmental Regulation: Developments in How to Set Requirements and Verify Compliance, George Mason University School of Public Policy, Research Paper no. 2012-01, 2012.
  115. Weide and T. L. van der, Arguing to Motivate Decisions, SIKS Dissertation Series, 2011.