Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2012, Article ID 873710, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/873710
Research Article

Evaluating Ethical Responsibility in Inverse Decision Support

College of Management, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, MI 48075-1058, USA

Received 5 April 2012; Accepted 16 July 2012

Academic Editor: Richard H. Weston

Copyright © 2012 Ahmad M. Kabil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  2. E. Turban, J. Aronson, T. Liang, and R. Sharda, Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 8th edition, 2006.
  3. G. Marakas, Decision Support Systems, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002.
  4. P. Keen and M. Morton, Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1978.
  5. H. Forester-Miller and T. Davis, A Practitioner's Guide To Ethical DeciSion Making, American Counseling Association, 1996, http://www.counseling.org/Resources/CodeOfEthics/TP/Home/CT2.aspx.
  6. “Association for computing machinery ACM code of ethics and professional conduct,” 1992, http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics.
  7. IEEE, “IEEE Code of Ethics,” 2006, http://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/about/whatis/code.html.
  8. R. Davison, “Professional ethics in information systems: a personal perspective,” Communications of the AIS, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1–34, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. T. Jelassi, K. Williams, and C. S. Fidler, “The emerging role of DSS: from passive to active,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 299–307, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. S. Sabne, Inverse Decision Making and Goal Attainment: A Proof of Concept as a New Approach to the Decision Making Process under Uncertainty, Old Dominion University Press, Norfolk, UK, 2006.
  11. R. Swartz, D. Dennis, C. Scott, D. Kalatu, and F. Michele Follen, “Inverse decision theory,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 101, no. 473, pp. 1–8, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. P. Shim, M. Warkentin, J. F. Courtney, D. J. Power, R. Sharda, and C. Carlsson, “Past, present, and future of decision support technology,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 111–126, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Ferraz and F. Finan, “Exposing corrupt politicians: the effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes,” Discussion Paper No. 2836, The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  14. B. A. Olken, “Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 200–249, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Reinikka and J. Svensson, “Local capture: evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 679–705, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Di Teila and E. Schargrodsky, “The role of wages and auditing during a crackdown on corruption in the city of Buenos Aires,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 269–292, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Arnott, P. O'donnell, and M. Grice, “Judgment bias and decision support systems research,” in Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 65–80, Brisbane, Australia, 1993.
  18. R. Meredith and D. Arnott, “On ethics and decision support systems development,” in Proceeding of the 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1562–1575, Adelaide, Australia, 2003.
  19. O. Ferrell and L. Gresham, “A Contingency framework for understanding ethical decision-making in marketing,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 87–96, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. P. Robin, R. E. Reidenbach, and P. J. Forrest, “The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Wong and E. Beckman, “An applied ethical analysis system in business,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 173–178, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Jones, “Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 366–395, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Hunt and S. Vitell, “A general theory of marketing ethics,” Journal of Macromarketing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Kohlberg, Essays on Moral Development, Volume I: The Philosophy of Moral Development, Harper and Row, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1981.
  25. S. Musser and E. Orke, “A basic typology of ethical value systems,” in Proceedings of the Council of Employees Rights and Responsibilities Conference, Miami, Fla, USA, 1992.
  26. J. Carlson, D. Carlson, and L. Wadsworth, “On the relationship between DSS design characteristics and ethical decision making,” Journal of Managerial Issues, vol. 11, pp. 180–197, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Johnson and J. Mulvey, “Accountability and computer decision systems (ethics and computer use),” Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 58–64, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Chae, D. Paradice, J. F. Courtney, and C. J. Cagle, “Incorporating an ethical perspective into problem formulation: implications for decision support systems design,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 197–212, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Fox, “Decision-support systems as safety-critical components: towards a safety culture for medical informatics.,” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 345–348, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Miller and K. Goodman, Ethical Challenges in the Use of Decision-Support Software in Clinical Practice, Edited by K. W. Goodman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
  31. T. L. Beauchamp, “Methods and principles in biomedical ethics,” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 269–274, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Oliver and M. Twery, Decision Support Systems/Models and Analyses, Edited by W. Sexton, A. Malik, R. Szaro and N. Johnson, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 1999.
  33. M. Danielson, “Handling imperfect user statements in real-life decision analysis,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 513–534, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  34. R. L. Keeney, “Common mistakes in making value trade-offs,” Operations Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 935–945, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Barron, “Influence of missing attributes on selecting a best multi-attributed alternative,” Decision Sciences, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 194–205, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Blythe, “Visual exploration and incremental utility elicitation,” in Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '02), pp. 526–532, Alberta, Canada, August 2002. View at Scopus
  37. T. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001.
  38. T. L. Saaty and M. Sagir, “Extending the measurement of tangibles to intangibles,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–27, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. L. Li and L. C. Ma, “Ranking decision alternatives by integrated DEA, AHP and gower plot techniques,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 241–258, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. Ahmad, D. Berg, and G. R. Simons, “The integration of analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis in a multi-criteria decision-making problem,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 263–276, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Nieto-Morote and F. Ruz-Vila, “A fuzzy ahp multi-criteria decision-making approach applied to combined cooling, heating, and power production systems,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 497–517, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. S. Thomaidis, N. Nikitakos, and G. D. Dounias, “The evaluation of information technology projects: a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–122, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Kabil and M. Kabeil, Initial Requirements of National Crisis Decision Support System, Edited by M. Jennex, IGI Global, Hershey, Pa, Usa, 2011.
  44. O. Onesime, X. Xu, and D. Zhan, “A decision support system for supplier selection process,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 453–470, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  45. L. T. Wu, X. Cui, and R. W. Dai, “Judgment number reduction: an issue in the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 175–189, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. W. Robbins and W. A. Wallace, “Decision support for ethical problem solving: a multi-agent approach,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1571–1587, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. Maner, “Heuristic methods for computer ethics,” Metaphilosophy, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 339–365, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index, “Transparency international organization,” 2010, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/press#report.