Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 354509, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/354509
Research Article

Efficiency in the Worst Production Situation Using Data Envelopment Analysis

1School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
2School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
3Department of Decision Science, School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 01610 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

Received 28 June 2012; Accepted 10 January 2013

Academic Editor: Graham Wood

Copyright © 2013 Md. Kamrul Hossain et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, S. S. Schmidt, and S. Yaisawarng, “Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 157–174, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. D. Banker and R. C. Morey, “Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs,” Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 513–521, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. McCarty and S. Yaisawarng, “Technical efficiency in New Jersey school districts,” in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, H. Fried, C. Lovell, and S. Schmidt, Eds., pp. 271–287, Oxford University Press, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Bhattacharyya, A. K. Lovell, and P. Sahay, “The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 332–345, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. S. Camanho, M. C. Portela, and C. B. Vaz, “Efficiency analysis accounting for internal and external non-discretionary factors,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1591–1601, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Golany and Y. Roll, “Some extensions of techniques to handle non-discretionary factors in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 419–432, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Ruggiero, “On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 553–565, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Ruggiero, “Performance evaluation when non-discretionary factors correlate with technical efficiency,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 250–257, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. H. Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and M. Esmaeili, “Non-discretionary factors and imprecise data in DEA,” International Journal of Math Analysis, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 237–246, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. S. J. Sadjadi and H. Omrani, “Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: an application for Iranian electricity distribution companies,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 4247–4254, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Simar and P. W. Wilson, “Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Simar and P. W. Wilson, “Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 49–78, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Simar and P. Wilson, “A general methodology for bootstrapping non parametric frontier models,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 779–802, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. T. Entani, Y. Maeda, and H. Tanaka, “Dual models of Interval DEA and its extension to interval data,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 32–45, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Kao and S. Liu, “Stochastic data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of Taiwan commercial banks,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 312–322, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. J. Farrell, “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, vol. 120, pp. 253–289, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. K. Land, C. A. K. Lovell, and S. Thore, “Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 14, pp. 541–554, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Guo and H. Tanaka, “Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 149–160, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. B. Efron, “Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. J. Zhu, “Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): a review and improvement with an application,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 513–529, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. W. W. Cooper, K. S. Park, and G. Yu, “Idea and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 597–607, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Kim, C. Park, and K. Park, “An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Robust solutions of Linear Programming problems contaminated with uncertain data,” Mathematical Programming B, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 411–424, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. D. Bertsimas and M. Sim, “The price of robustness,” Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 35–53, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. T. Kuosmanen and M. Fosgerau, “Neoclassical versus frontier production models? Testing for the skewness of regression residuals,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 351–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Kuosmanen and A. L. Johnson, “Data envelopment analysis as nonparametric least-squares regression,” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 149–160, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. D. J. Aigner, C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt, “Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 21–37, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. J. Sadjadi and H. Omrani, “A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 221–232, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Yoshida, “Endogenous-weight TFP measurement: methodology and its application to Japanese-airport benchmarking,” Transportation Research E, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 151–182, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus