Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2013, Article ID 915657, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/915657
Research Article

An Inventory Decision Model When Demand Follows Innovation Diffusion Process under Effect of Technological Substitution

Department of Operational Research, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, New Academic Block, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

Received 14 April 2013; Revised 3 September 2013; Accepted 10 September 2013

Academic Editor: S. Dempe

Copyright © 2013 K. K. Aggarwal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1983.
  2. L. A. Fourt and J. W. WoodLock, “Early prediction of Market success for new grocery products,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 31–38, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. C. Fisher and R. H. Pry, “A simple substitution model of technological change,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 3, no. C, pp. 75–88, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. M. Bass, “A new product growth for model consumer durables,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1825–1832, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Peres, E. Muller, and V. Mahajan, “Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 91–106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. M. Parker, “Aggregate diffusion forecasting models in marketing: a critical review,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 353–380, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1995.
  8. R. Peres, E. Muller, and V. Mahajan, “Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 91–106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Mahajan, E. Muller, and Y. Wind, New-Product Diffusion Models, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
  10. F. Cheng and S. P. Sethi, “Periodic review inventory model with demand influenced by promotion decisions,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1510–1523, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Kalish, “A new product adoption model with price advertising and uncertainty,” Management Science, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1569–1585, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  12. V. Mahajan and A. P. Robert, “Innovation diffusion in a dynamic potential adopter population,” Management Science, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 1589–1597, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. N. Sharif and K. Ramanathan, “Polynomial innovation diffusion models,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 301–323, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. N. Sharif and K. Ramanathan, “Binomial innovation diffusion models with dynamic potential adopter population,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63–87, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. A. Norton and F. M. Bass, “A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generation of high-technology products,” Management Science, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1069–1086, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  16. V. Mahajan and E. Muller, “Timing, diffusion, and substitution of successive generations of technological innovations: the IBM mainframe case,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 109–132, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. W. Speece and D. L. Maclachlan, “Application of a multi-generation diffusion model to milk container technology,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 281–295, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. J. Danaher, B. G. S. Hardie, and W. P. Putsis Jr., “Marketing-mix variables and the diffusion of successive generations of a technological innovation,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 501–514, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Islam and N. Meade, “The diffusion of successive generations of a technology: a more general model,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Kim, D. R. Chang, and A. D. Shocker, “Modeling intercategory and generational dynamics for a growing information technology industry,” Management Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 496–512, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Bayus, “The dynamic pricing of next generation consumer durables,” Marketing Science, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 251–265, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. K. Bardhan and U. Chanda, “A model for first and substitution adoption of successive generations of a product,” International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 487–494, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. U. Chanda and A. K. Bardhan, “Dynamic optimal advertising expenditure strategies of two successive generations of consumer durables,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling, Computation and Optimization held during January 2008 in the venue SQC & OR Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, India, 2008.
  24. K. A. Bardhan and U. Chanda, “A mathematical model for diffusion of products with multiple generations,” International Journal of Operational Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 214–229, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. U. Chanda and A. Kumar, “Economic order quantity model with demand influenced by dynamic innovation effect,” International Journal of Operational Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 193–215, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. K. K. Aggarwal, C. K. Jaggi, and A. Kumar, “Economic order quantity model with innovation diffusion criterion having dynamic potential market size,” International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 280–303, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. U. Chanda and A. Kumar, “Economic order quantity model on inflationary conditions with demand influenced by innovation diffusion criterion,” International Journal of Procurement Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–177, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. M.-S. Chern, J.-T. Teng, and H.-L. Yang, “Inventory lot-size policies for the bass diffusion demand models of new durable products,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. K. Aggarwal and A. Kumar, “An inventory model for new product when demand follows dynamic innovation process having dynamic potential market size,” International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 78–99, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Kumar, K. K. Aggarwal, and U. Chanda, “Economic order quantity model under fuzzy sense with demand follows Bass's innovation diffusion process,” International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 261–281, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  31. K. K. Aggarwal, C. K. Jaggi, and A. Kumar, “Economic order quantity model under fuzzy sense when demand follows innovation diffusion process having dynamic potential market size,” International Journal of Services and Operations Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 361–391, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  32. V. Mahajan and R. A. Peterson, Models of Innovation Diffusion, Sage, 1985.
  33. E. Ruiz-Conde, P. S. H. Leeflang, and J. E. Wieringa, “Marketing variables in macro-level diffusion models,” Journal fur Betriebswirtschaft, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 155–183, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. Chandrasekaran and G. J. Tellis, “A critical review of marketing research on diffusion of new products,” Review of Marketing Research, pp. 39–80, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  35. F. Sultan, J. U. Farley, and D. R. Lehmann, “A meta-analysis of diffusion models,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. Talukdar, K. Sudhir, and A. Ainslie, “Investigating new product diffusion across products and countries,” Marketing Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 97–114, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. van den Bulte and S. Stremersch, “Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: a meta-analytic test,” Marketing Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 530–544, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. L. Lilien, P. Kotler, and K. S. Moorthy, Marketing Models, Prentice-Hall of India Private, New Delhi, India, 1999.