Table of Contents
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2015, Article ID 213758, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/213758
Research Article

The Balanced Scorecard and the Strategic Learning Process: A System Dynamics Modeling Approach

Department of Economics and Business Economics, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark

Received 31 July 2014; Revised 27 March 2015; Accepted 30 March 2015

Academic Editor: David Bulger

Copyright © 2015 Steen Nielsen and Erland H. Nielsen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. de Geuser, S. Mooraj, and D. Oyon, “Does the balanced scorecard add value? Empirical evidence on its effect on performance,” European Accounting Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 93–122, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Wiersma, “For which purposes do managers use balanced scorecards? An empirical study,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 239–251, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Otley, “Management control and performance management: whence and whither?” The British Accounting Review, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 309–326, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. G. Hopwood, “Management accounting research in a changing world,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. H. Chenhall and K. Langfield-Smith, “Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Guilding, K. S. Cravens, and M. Tayles, “An international comparison of strategic management accounting practices,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–135, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. S. Kaplan, “The competitive advantage of management accounting,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. T. Malmi and D. A. Brown, “Management control systems as a package—opportunities, challenges and research directions,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 287–300, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. H. Davenport, “Competing on analytics,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 98–108, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Birnberg, M. Shields, and S. Young, “The case for multiple research methods in empirical management accounting research (with an illustration from budget setting),” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 2, pp. 33–66, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. H. Chenhall, “Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 395–422, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. D. Ittner and D. F. Larcker, “Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective,” Journal of Accounting & Economics, vol. 32, no. 1–3, pp. 349–410, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. A. Merchant, W. A. van der Stede, and L. Zheng, “Disciplinary constraints on the advancement of knowledge: the case of organizational incentive systems,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 28, no. 2-3, pp. 251–286, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Neely, “The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next?” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 205–228, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. D. Ittner and D. F. Larcker, “Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications,” Journal of Management Research, vol. 10, pp. 205–238, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. D. Ittner, “Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence,” Accounting and Business Research, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 261–272, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. D. Banker, G. Potter, and D. Srinivasan, “An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures,” The Accounting Review, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 65–92, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. S. Dikolli and K. L. Sedatole, “Improvements in the information content of nonfinancial forward-looking performance measures: a taxonomy and empirical application,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71–104, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 85, no. 7-8, pp. 150–194, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Execution Premium Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 2008.
  21. D. J. Teece, “Strategies for managing knowledge assets: the role of firm structure and industrial context,” Long Range Planning, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. P. Norton, “Is management finally ready for the ‘systems approach’?” Balanced Scorecard Report, vol. 2, no. 5, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Hudson, A. Smart, and M. Bourne, “Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1096–1115, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Sundin, M. Granlund, and D. A. Brown, “Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard,” European Accounting Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 203–246, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Brinberg and J. E. McGrath, Validity and the Research Process, SAGE Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  26. H. A. Simon, “Bounded rationality and organizational learning,” Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 125–134, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Bisbe, J.-M. Batista-Foguet, and R. Chenhall, “Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 32, no. 7-8, pp. 789–820, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Argyris, “Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 363–375, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Argyris, Teaching Smart People How to Learn, Harvard Business Review, 1991.
  30. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard—Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1996.
  32. I. Cobbold, G. Lawrie, and K. Issa, “Designing a strategic management system using the thirdgeneration balanced scorecard: a case study,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 624–633, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. Excitant, 2011, http://www.excitant.co.uk/pages/bsc_four_generations.htm.
  34. G. Speckbacher, J. Bischof, and T. Pfeiffer, “A descriptive analysis on the implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-speaking countries,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 361–387, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. W. Anderson, C. Fornell, and D. R. Lehmann, “Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: findings from Sweden,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 53–66, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. E. W. Anderson, C. Fornell, and R. T. Rust, “Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: differences between goods and services,” Marketing Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129–145, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Ashton, Strategic Performance Measurement: Transforming Corporate Performance by Measuring and Managing the Drivers of Business Success, Business Intelligence, London, UK, 1997.
  38. A. J. Rucci, S. P. Kirn, and R. T. Quinn, The Employee-Customer Profit Chain at Sears, Harvard Business Review, 1998.
  39. C. D. Ittner and D. F. Larcker, “Coming up Short on Nonfinancial Performance Measurement,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 88–95, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. E. Wiersma, “An exploratory study of relative and incremental information content of two non-financial performance measures: field study evidence on absence frequency and on-time delivery,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 33, no. 2-3, pp. 249–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Malmi, “Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: aresearch note,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. C. F. de Winter, D. Dodou, and P. A. Wieringa, “Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 147–181, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. S. Ghasemi, “Using structural equation modeling in causal relationship design for balanced-scorecards strategic map,” in Proceedings of the World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology Conference, 2009.
  44. A. Neely, H. Richards, J. Mills, K. Platts, and M. Bourne, “Designing performance measures: a structured approach,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1131–1152, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. E. G. Flamholtz, “The process of measurement in managerial accounting: a psycho-technical systems perspective,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Ferreira and D. Otley, “The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 263–282, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Z. Hoque and W. James, “Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. H. Nørreklit, “The balance on the balanced scorecard—a critical analysis of some of its assumptions,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–88, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. A. Malina and F. H. Selto, “Choice and change of measures in performance measurement models,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 441–469, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. A. Malina and F. M. Selto, Causality in a Performance Measurement Model, WP, MIT, Boston, Mass, USA, 2004.
  51. H. Nørreklit and F. Mitchell, “Contemporary issues on the balance scorecard,” Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 431, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  52. S. Brignall, “The unbalanced scorecard: a social and environmental critique,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Performance Measurement and Management, Boston, Mass, USA, July 2002.
  53. M. A. Malina, H. S. O. Nørreklit, and F. H. Selto, “Relations among measures, climate of control, and performance measurement models,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 662–982, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. W. J. Granger, “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods,” Econometrica, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 424–238, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. P. Senge and J. W. Forrester, “Test for building confidence in system dynamics models,” in TIMS Studies in the Management Science, vol. 14, pp. 209–228, North Holland Publishing, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  56. P. N. Bukh and T. Malmi, “Re-examining the cause-and-effect principle of the balanced scorecard,” in Accounting in Scandivavia—The Northern Lights, S. Jönsson and J. Mouritsen, Eds., Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  57. J. W. Forrester, “Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 37–66, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  58. K. Warren, “Why has feedback systems thinking struggled to influence strategy and policy formulation? Suggestive evidence, explanations and solutions,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 331–347, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art & practice of the Learning Organization, Random House Business, 1990.
  60. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy,” California Management Review, vol. 39, pp. 53–79, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  61. R. D. Banker, H. Chang, S. N. Janakiraman, and C. Konstans, “A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 423–436, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  62. J. D. Sterman, Business Dynamics System Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
  63. G. K. Kanji, “Performance measurement system,” Total Quality Management, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 715–728, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. T. H. Davenport and J. Kim, Keeping Up with the Quants, Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
  65. Z. Hoque, “20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research,” The British Accounting Review, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–59, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. C. Lane, “Modelling as learning: a consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 64–84, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. A. M. Vennix, “Group model-building: tackling messy problems,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 379–401, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. D. Smith, “The strategic role of knowledge and innovation systems thinking,” International Journal of Business & Systems Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 200–215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. D. W. Morecroft and J. D. Sterman, “Modelling for learning,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 1, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  70. G. P. Richardson and D. F. Andersen, “Teamwork in group model building,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 113–137, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. K. Warren and P. Langley, “The effective communication of system dynamics to improve insight and learning in management education,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 396–404, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. R. D. H. Warburton, “An analytical investigation of the bullwhip effect,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 150–160, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. R. D. H. Warburton, J. P. E. Hodgson, and E. H. Nielsen, “Exact solutions to the supply chain equations for arbitrary, time-dependent demands,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 151, pp. 195–205, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. H. Meadows, “The unavoidable A priori,” in Elements of the System Dynamics Method, J. Randers, Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  75. P. B. Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
  76. C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  77. G. Coyle, “Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: some research questions,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 225–244, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. D. Katz and R. L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organizations, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1978.
  79. J. G. March and H. A. Simon, Organizations, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1958.
  80. E. F. Wolstenholme, “Qualitative vs quantitative modelling: the evolving balance,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 422–428, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. A. Malina and F. H. Selto, “Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–90, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. J. W. Forrester, System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years, WP MIT, 1991.
  83. R. L. Eberlein and D. W. Peterson, “Understanding models with Vensim,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 216–219, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. H. A. Akkermans and K. E. van Oorschot, “Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 931–941, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. S. Nielsen and E. H. Nielsen, “System dynamics modelling for a balanced scorecard: computing the influence of skills, customers, and work in process on the return on capital employed,” Management Research News, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 169–188, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. K. Warren, “Improving strategic management with the fundamental principles of system dynamics,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 329–350, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. F. Barnabè and C. Busco, “The causal relationships between performance drivers and outcomes: reinforcing balanced scorecards' implementation through system dynamics models,” Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 528–538, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. F. Barnabè, “A ‘system dynamics-based Balanced Scorecard’ to support strategic decision making: insights from a case study,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 446–473, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Womack and D. T. Jones, “From lean production to the lean enterprise,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  90. J. P. Womarck and D. T. Jones, Lean Thinking, Simon & Schuster, London, UK, 2003.
  91. R. L. Ackoff, “Why few organizations adopt systems thinking,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 705–708, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. A. P. de Geus, “Modelling to predict or to learn?” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. R. L. Ackoff, “On the use of models in corporate planning,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 353–359, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. H. A. Simon, “Prediction and prescription in systems modeling,” Operations Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. K. Warren, Strategic Management Dynamics, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2008.
  96. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, Strategy Maps, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 2004.
  97. B. H. Maskell and F. A. Kennedy, “Why do we need lean accounting and how does it work?” Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 59–73, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. R. R. Niven, Balanced Scorecard Step by Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results, Wiley, Ontario, Canada, 2nd edition, 2006.
  99. D. J. Collis and M. G. Rukstad, “Can you say what your strategy is?” Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 82–137, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1961. View at MathSciNet
  101. M. C. Deluzio, “Management accounting in a just-in-time environment,” Journal of Cost Accouting, pp. 6–14, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  102. S. Samaddar and T. Kaul, “Effect of setup and processing time reductions on WIP in the JIT production systems,” Management Science, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1263–1265, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. J. W. Forrester, System Dynamics and K-12 Teachers, A Lecture at the University of Virginia School of Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1996.
  104. M. Schwaninger and S. Grösser, “System dynamics as model-based theory building,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 447–465, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. M. Beasley, A. Chen, K. Nunez, and L. Wright, “Working hand in hand: balanced scorecard and enterprise risk management,” Strategic Finance, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 49–55, 2006. View at Google Scholar