Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2016, Article ID 8256072, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8256072
Research Article

A Rough Set Based Assessment of the Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Tanzanian Shipping Sector Perspective

1Unit for Applied Mathematics, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 2958, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
2Department of Logistics and Transport Studies, National Institute of Transport, P.O. Box 705, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Received 27 October 2015; Revised 10 February 2016; Accepted 29 February 2016

Academic Editor: Panos Pardalos

Copyright © 2016 Erick P. Massami and Benitha M. Myamba. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Det Norske Veritas, “Assessment of measures to reduce future CO2 emissions from shipping,” Research and Innovation, Position Paper 05-2010, 2010, http://www.dnv.com.
  2. IPCC, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html.
  3. IMO, “Reduction of GHG emissions from ships: third IMO GHG Study 2014,” Final Report MEPC 67/INF.3, International Maritime Organization, London, UK, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. IMO, “Second IMO GHG study 2009,” MEPC 59/INF.10, International Maritime Organization, London, UK, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. S. Eide, O. Endresen, R. Skjong, T. Longva, and S. Alvik, “Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 367–384, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Crist, “Greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential from international shipping,” in Proceedings of the International Transport Forum, Leipzig, Germany, 2009.
  7. J. J. Corbett, H. Wang, and J. J. Winebrake, “The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 593–598, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. IMO, “Prevention of air pollution from ships: proposal to establish a vessel efficient system submitted by World Shipping Council,” Tech. Rep. MEPC60, International Maritime Organization, London, UK, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Blasco, V. Durán-Grados, M. Hampel, and J. Moreno-Gutiérrez, “Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of emissions from ships' propulsion systems,” Environment International, vol. 66, pp. 44–47, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Lindstad, B. E. Asbjørnslett, and A. H. Strømman, “The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping,” Energy Policy, vol. 46, pp. 386–398, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Moreno-Gutiérrez, F. Calderay, N. Saborido, M. Boile, R. Rodríguez Valero, and V. Durán-Grados, “Methodologies for estimating shipping emissions and energy consumption: a comparative analysis of current methods,” Energy, vol. 86, pp. 603–616, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Lindstad, B. E. Asbjørnslett, and A. H. Strømman, “Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3456–3464, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Maragkogianni and S. Papaefthimiou, “Evaluating the social cost of cruise ships air emissions in major ports of Greece,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 36, pp. 10–17, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. Eyring, I. S. A. Isaksen, T. Berntsen et al., “Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: shipping,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 44, no. 37, pp. 4735–4771, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Zhou and H. Wang, “Carbon capture and storage—solidification and storage of carbon dioxide captured on ships,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 91, pp. 172–180, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. N. Armstrong, “Vessel optimisation for low carbon shipping,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 73, pp. 195–207, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Winnes, L. Styhre, and E. Fridell, “Reducing GHG emissions from ships in port areas,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 17, pp. 73–82, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Kitada and A. Ölcer, “Managing people and technology: the challenges in CSR and energy efficient shipping,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 17, pp. 36–40, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  19. C.-C. Chang and C.-M. Wang, “Evaluating the effects of speed reduce for shipping costs and CO2 emission,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 31, pp. 110–115, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Heitmann and S. Khalilian, “Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping: burden sharing under different UNFCCC allocation options and regime scenarios,” Marine Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 682–691, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. H. V. Lun, K.-H. Lai, C. W. Y. Wong, and T. C. E. Cheng, “Environmental governance mechanisms in shipping firms and their environmental performance,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 78, pp. 82–92, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. T. Poulsen, S. Ponte, and J. Lister, “Buyer-driven greening? Cargo-owners and environmental upgrading in maritime shipping,” Geoforum, vol. 68, pp. 57–68, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  23. H. Lindstad, R. M. Bright, and A. H. Strømman, “Economic savings linked to future Arctic shipping trade are at odds with climate change mitigation,” Transport Policy, vol. 45, pp. 24–30, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Calleya, R. Pawling, and A. Greig, “Ship impact model for technical assessment and selection of Carbon dioxide Reducing Technologies (CRTs),” Ocean Engineering, vol. 97, pp. 82–89, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Heitmann and S. Peterson, “The potential contribution of the shipping sector to an efficient reduction of global carbon dioxide emissions,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 42, pp. 56–66, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. B. Shi, “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: is it time to consider market-based measures?” Marine Policy, vol. 64, pp. 123–134, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. D. Chatzinikolaou and N. P. Ventikos, “Holistic framework for studying ship air emissions in a life cycle perspective,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 110, pp. 113–122, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Lu, O. Turan, E. Boulougouris, C. Banks, and A. Incecik, “A semi-empirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 110, pp. 18–28, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  29. X. Qi and D.-P. Song, “Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 863–880, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Miola and B. Ciuffo, “Estimating air emissions from ships: meta-analysis of modelling approaches and available data sources,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 2242–2251, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. S. L. Lam and K.-H. Lai, “Developing environmental sustainability by ANP-QFD approach: the case of shipping operations,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 105, pp. 275–284, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Z. Ren and M. Lützen, “Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for technology selection for emissions reduction from shipping under uncertainties,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 40, pp. 43–60, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. A. Mansouri, H. Lee, and O. Aluko, “Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: a review and future directions,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 78, pp. 3–18, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. W. Grzymala-Busse, “Rough set strategies to data with missing attribute values,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 56–63, Melbourne, Fla, USA, November 2003.
  35. Z. Suraj, “An introduction to rough set theory and its applications: a tutorial,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO ’04), Cairo, Egypt, December 2004.
  36. Det Norske Veritas, “Project Final Report on the Assessment of IMO mandated energy efficiency measures for international shipping: estimated CO2 emissions reduction from introduction of mandatory technical and operational energy efficiency measures for ships,” MEPC 63/INF.2, International Maritime Organization, London, UK, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  37. International Maritime Organization (IMO), “Reduction of GHG emissions from ships: marginal abatement costs and cost-effectiveness of energy-efficiency measures,” Tech. Rep. MEPC 61/INF.18, International Maritime Organization (IMO), London, UK, 2010. View at Google Scholar