Table of Contents
Advances in Ecology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 917834, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/917834
Review Article

Structuring Effects of Deer in Boreal Forest Ecosystems

1Chaire de Recherche Industrielle CRSNG en Aménagement Intégré des Ressources de L’île d’Anticosti, Département de Biologie et Centre d’Études Nordiques, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6
2Direction de la Recherche Forestière, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, 2700 Einstein, Québec, QC, Canada G1P 3W8

Received 2 June 2014; Accepted 19 August 2014; Published 16 September 2014

Academic Editor: Junbao Yu

Copyright © 2014 Steeve D. Côté et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. D. Côté, T. P. Rooney, J.-P. Tremblay, C. Dussault, and D. M. Waller, “Ecological impacts of deer overabundance,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 35, pp. 113–147, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. R. Conover, “Monetary and intangible valuation of deer in the United States,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 298–305, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. J. McShea, H. B. Underwood, and J. H. Rappole, Eds., The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  4. R. Perea, M. Girardello, and A. San Miguel, “Big game or big loss? High deer densities are threatening woody plant diversity and vegetation dynamics,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1303–1318, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. B. Horsley and D. A. Marquis, “Interference by weeds and deer with Allegheny hardwood reproduction,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. J. Augustine, L. E. Frelich, and P. A. Jordan, “Evidence for two alternate stable states in an ungulate grazing system,” Ecological Applications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1260–1269, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. B. McGraw and M. A. Furedi, “Deer browsing and population viability of a forest understory plant,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5711, pp. 920–922, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. T. Hobbs, “Modification of ecosystems by ungulates,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 695–713, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. P. Rooney, R. J. McCormick, S. L. Solheim, and D. M. Waller, “Regional variation in recruitment of hemlock seedlings and saplings in the upper Great Lakes, USA,” Ecological Applications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1119–1132, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Beguin, D. Pothier, and S. D. Côté, “Deer browsing and soil disturbance induce cascading effects on plant communities: a multilevel path analysis,” Ecological Applications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 439–451, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. A. Bråthen, R. A. Ims, N. G. Yoccoz, P. Fauchald, T. Tveraa, and V. H. Hausner, “Induced shift in ecosystem productivity? Extensive scale effects of abundant large herbivores,” Ecosystems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 773–789, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. A. Wardle, G. M. Barker, G. W. Yeates, K. I. Bonner, and A. Ghani, “Introduced browsing mammals in New Zealand natural forests: aboveground and belowground consequences,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 587–614, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. T. Hobbs, “Large herbivore as sources of disturbance in ecosystems,” in Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation, K. Danell, R. Bergstrom, P. Duncan, and J. Pastor, Eds., pp. 261–288, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. K. Bump, C. R. Webster, J. A. Vucetich, R. O. Peterson, J. M. Shields, and M. D. Powers, “Ungulate carcasses perforate ecological filters and create biogeochemical hotspots in forest herbaceous layers allowing trees a competitive advantage,” Ecosystems, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 996–1007, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. S. Alverson and D. M. Waller, “Deer populations and the widespread failure of hemlock regeneration in northern forests,” in The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management, W. J. McShea, H. B. Underwood, and J. H. Rappole, Eds., pp. 280–297, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. Z. T. Long, T. H. Pendergast IV, and W. P. Carson, “The impact of deer on relationships between tree growth and mortality in an old-growth beech-maple forest,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 252, no. 1–3, pp. 230–238, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. S. Holling, “Resilience and stability of ecological systems,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. B. Hidding, J.-P. Tremblay, and S. D. Côté, “A large herbivore triggers alternative successional trajectories in the boreal forest,” Ecology, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2852–2860, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. S. deCalesta, “Effect of white-tailed deer on songbirds within managed forests in Pennsylvania,” The Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 711–718, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Allombert, A. J. Gaston, and J.-L. Martin, “A natural experiment on the impact of overabundant deer on songbird populations,” Biological Conservation, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Allombert, S. Stockton, and J.-L. Martin, “A natural experiment on the impact of overabundant deer on forest invertebrates,” Conservation Biology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1917–1929, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. D. Côté, “Impacts on ecosystems,” in Biology and Management of White-Tailed Deer, D. G. Hewitt, Ed., pp. 379–398, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. Nuttle, E. H. Yerger, S. H. Stoleson, and T. E. Ristau, “Legacy of top-down herbivore pressure ricochets back up multiple trophic levels in forest canopies over 30 years,” Ecosphere, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. J. McShea and J. H. Rappole, “Managing the abundance and diversity of breeding bird populations through manipulation of deer populations,” Conservation Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1161–1170, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Smit, J. Bokdam, J. den Ouden, H. Olff, H. Schot-Opschoor, and M. Schrijvers, “Effects of introduction and exclusion of large herbivores on small rodent communities,” Plant Ecology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. D. Côté, “Extirpation of a large black bear population by introduced white-tailed deer,” Conservation Biology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1668–1671, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. R. Greenwald, L. J. Petit, and T. A. Waite, “Indirect effects of a keystone herbivore elevate local animal diversity,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1318–1321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. D. Côté, C. Dussault, J. Huot, F. Potvin, J.-P. Tremblay, and V. Viera, “High herbivore density and boreal forest ecology: white-tailed deer on Anticosti Island,” in Lessons from the Islands: Introduced Species and What They Tell Us about How Ecosystems Work, A. J. Gaston, T. E. Golumbia, J.-L. Martin, and S. T. Sharpe, Eds., Proceedings from the Research Group on Introduced Species Conference, Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Papers, British Columbia, Canada, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  29. J.-P. Saucier, A. Robitaille, and P. Grondin, “Cadre bioclimatique du Québec,” in Manuel de Foresterie, Second Edition, R. Doucet and M. Côté, Eds., Ordre des ingénieurs forestiers du Québec, pp. 186–205, Éditions Multimondes, Québec, Canada, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Barrette, L. Bélanger, and L. De Grandpré, “Preindustrial reconstruction of a perhumid midboreal landscape, Anticosti Island, Quebec,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 928–942, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Parent, M.-J. Simard, H. Morin, and C. Messier, “Establishment and dynamics of the balsam fir seedling bank in old forests of northeastern Quebec,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 597–603, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. B. Rochette and A. Gingras, Inventaire aérien du cerf de Virginie de l’île d’Anticosti—Été 2006, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de l’aménagement de la faune de la Côte-Nord, Sept-Îles, Canada, 2007.
  33. A. Massé and S. D. Côté, “Linking alternative food sources to winter habitat selection of herbivores in overbrowsed landscapes,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 544–556, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. A. Simard, T. Coulson, A. Gingras, and S. D. Côté, “Influence of density and climate on population dynamics of a large herbivore under harsh environmental conditions,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 1671–1685, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Potvin, P. Beaupré, and G. Laprise, “The eradication of balsam fir stands by white-tailed deer on Anticosti Island, Québec: a 150-year process,” Ecoscience, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 487–495, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J.-P. Tremblay, I. Thibault, C. Dussault, J. Huot, and S. D. Côté, “Long-term decline in white-tailed deer browse supply: can lichens and litterfall act as alternative food sources that preclude density-dependent feedbacks,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 1087–1096, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Barrette, L. Bélanger, L. De Granpré, and J.-C. Ruel, “Cumulative effects of chronic deer browsing and clear-cutting on regeneration processes in second-growth white spruce stands,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 329, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  38. J. Taillon, D. G. Sauvé, and S. D. Côté, “The effects of decreasing winter diet quality on foraging behavior and life-history traits of white-tailed deer fawns,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1445–1454, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. G. Sauvé and S. D. Côté, “Winter forage selection in white-tailed deer at high density: balsam fir is the best of a bad choice,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 911–914, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J.-P. Tremblay, J. Huot, and F. Potvin, “Density-related effects of deer browsing on the regeneration dynamics of boreal forests,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 552–562, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Anouk Simard, S. D. Côté, R. B. Weladji, and J. Huot, “Feedback effects of chronic browsing on life-history traits of a large herbivore,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 678–686, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. Beaupré, C. Bédard, C. Dufour, A. Gingras, C. Malenfant, and F. Potvin, Plan général d'aménagement intégré des ressources du milieu forestier de l'île d'Anticosti, Produits forestiers Anticosti, Québec, Canada, 2004.
  43. J. Huot, F. Potvin, and M. Bélanger, “Southeastern Canada,” in White-Tailed Deer Ecology and Management, L. K. Halls, Ed., pp. 293–304, Wildlife Management Institute, Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pa, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  44. F. Reimoser and H. Gossow, “Impact of ungulates on forest vegetation and its dependence on the silvicultural system,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 88, no. 1-2, pp. 107–119, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. Kay, “Factors affecting severity of deer browsing damage within coppiced woodlands in the south of England,” Biological Conservation, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Casabon and D. Pothier, “Browsing of tree regeneration by white-tailed deer in large clearcuts on Anticosti Island, Quebec,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 253, no. 1–3, pp. 112–119, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. W. Hughes and D. A. Bechtel, “Effect of distance from forest edge on regeneration of red spruce and balsam fir in clearcuts,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2088–2096, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. F. Greene, J. C. Zasada, L. Sirois et al., “A review of the regeneration dynamics of North American boreal forest tree species,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 824–839, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Beguin, D. Pothier, and M. Prévost, “Can the impact of deer browsing on tree regeneration be mitigated by shelterwood cutting and strip clearcutting?” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 257, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Beguin, M. Prévost, D. Pothier, and S. D. Côté, “Establishment of natural regeneration under severe browsing pressure from white-tailed deer after group seed-tree cutting with scarification on Anticosti Island,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 596–605, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. Feeny, “Plant apparency and chemical defense,” in Biochemical Interactions between Plants and Insects, J. W. Wallace and R. L. Mansell, Eds., vol. 10 of Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, pp. 1–40, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  52. A. M. Miller, C. McArthur, and P. J. Smethurst, “Characteristics of tree seedlings and neighbouring vegetation have an additive influence on browsing by generalist herbivores,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 228, no. 1–3, pp. 197–205, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. Faure-Lacroix, J.-P. Tremblay, N. Thiffault, and V. Roy, “Stock type performance in addressing top-down and bottom-up factors for the restoration of indigenous trees,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 307, pp. 333–340, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. J. Hester, L. Edenius, R. M. Buttenschøn, and A. T. Kuiters, “Interactions between forests and herbivores: the role of controlled grazing experiments,” Forestry, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 381–391, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. J. Fuller and R. M. A. Gill, “Ecological impacts of increasing numbers of deer in British woodland,” Forestry, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 193–199, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. Bergström and L. Edenius, “From twigs to landscapes—methods for studying ecological effects of forest ungulates,” Journal for Nature Conservation, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 203–211, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. P. Rooney and D. M. Waller, “Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 181, no. 1-2, pp. 165–176, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J.-P. Tremblay, J. Huot, and F. Potvin, “Divergent nonlinear responses of the boreal forest field layer along an experimental gradient of deer densities,” Oecologia, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. A. Royo and W. P. Carson, “On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1345–1362, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. M. Bachand, S. Pellerin, M. Moretti et al., “Functional responses and resilience of boreal forest ecosystem after reduction of deer density,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e90437, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. B. Hidding, J.-P. Tremblay, and S. D. Côté, “Survival and growth of balsam fir seedlings and saplings under multiple controlled ungulate densities,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 276, pp. 96–103, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. N. Suding, K. L. Gross, and G. R. Houseman, “Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. K. Cuddington, “Legacy effects: the persistent impact of ecological interactions,” Biological Theory, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 203–210, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  64. A. J. Tanentzap, D. R. Bazely, S. Koh et al., “Seeing the forest for the deer: do reductions in deer-disturbance lead to forest recovery?” Biological Conservation, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 376–382, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. A. Royo, R. Collins, M. B. Adams, C. Kirschbaum, and W. P. Carson, “Pervasive interactions between ungulate browsers and disturbance regimes promote temperate forest herbaceous diversity,” Ecology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. P. J. Kuijper, B. Jedrzejewska, B. Brzeziecki, W. Jędrzejewski, and H. Żybura, “Fluctuating ungulate density shapes tree recruitment in natural stands of the Białowieza Primeval Forest, Poland,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1082–1098, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. P. Rosenthal and P. M. Kotanen, “Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 145–148, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. F. Lebel, C. Dussault, A. Massé, and S. D. Côté, “Influence of habitat features and hunter behavior on white-tailed deer harvest,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 1431–1440, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M.-A. Simard, J. Huot, S. de Bellefeuille, and S. D. Côté, “Influences of habitat composition, plant phenology, and population density on autumn indices of body condition in a northern white-tailed deer population,” Wildlife Monographs, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. W. F. Porter, N. E. Mathews, H. B. Underwood, R. W. Sage Jr., and D. F. Behrend, “Social organization in deer: implications for localized management,” Environmental Management, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 809–814, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. A. McNulty, W. F. Porter, N. E. Mathews, and J. A. Hill, “Localized management for reducing white-tailed deer populations,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 265–271, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. A. Simard, C. Dussault, J. Huot, and S. D. Côté, “Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 254–269, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. E. Van Wieren, “Effects of large herbivores upon the animal community,” in Grazing and Conservation Management, M. F. W. DeVries, J. P. Bakker, and S. E. Van Wieren, Eds., pp. 185–214, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  74. O. Suominen and O. K. Danell, “Effects of large herbivores on other fauna,” in Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics And Conservation, K. Danell, R. Bergstrom, P. Duncan, and J. Pastor, Eds., pp. 383–412, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  75. K. M. Mathisen and C. Skarpe, “Cascading effects of moose (Alces alces) management on birds,” Ecological Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 563–574, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. C. N. Foster, P. S. Barton, and D. B. Lindenmayer, “Effects of large native herbivores on other animals,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 929–938, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  77. E. Cardinal, J.-L. Martin, J.-P. Tremblay, and S. D. Côté, “An experimental study of how variation in deer density affects vegetation and songbird assemblages of recently harvested boreal forests,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 704–713, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. E. Cardinal, J.-L. Martin, and S. D. Côté, “Large herbivore effects on songbirds in boreal forests: lessons from deer introduction on anticosti Island,” Ecoscience, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. P.-M. Brousseau, C. Hébert, C. Cloutier, and S. D. Côté, “Short-term effects of reduced white-tailed deer density on insect communities in a strongly overbrowsed boreal forest ecosystem,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 77–92, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. G. Darmon, B. Hidding, S. De Bellefeuille, J.-P. Tremblay, and S. D. Côté, “A generalist rodent benefits from logging regardless of deer density,” Ecoscience, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 319–327, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. Scheffer and S. R. Carpenter, “Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 648–656, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. T. Nuttle, A. A. Royo, M. B. Adams, and W. P. Carson, “Historic disturbance regimes promote tree diversity only under low browsing regimes in eastern deciduous forest,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. T. Nuttle, T. E. Ristau, and A. A. Royo, “Long-term biological legacies of herbivore density in a landscape-scale experiment: forest understoreys reflect past deer density treatments for at least 20 years,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 221–228, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. Pastor, B. Dewey, R. J. Naiman, P. F. McInnes, and Y. Cohen, “Moose browsing and soil fertility in the boreal forests of Isle Royale National Park,” Ecology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 467–480, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. O. Tahvanainen and R. B. Root, “The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Oecologia, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 321–346, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. C. D. Thomas, “Butterfly larvae reduce host plant survival in vicinity of alternative host species,” Oecologia, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 113–117, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. P. Barbosa, J. Hines, I. Kaplan, H. Martinson, A. Szczepaniec, and Z. Szendrei, “Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. Bachand, S. Pellerin, S. D. Côté et al., “Species indicators of ecosystem recovery after reducing large herbivore density: comparing taxa and testing species combinations,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Hjältén, K. Danell, and L. Ericson, “Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches,” Ecology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1136–1142, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. A. Riggs, A. R. Tiedemann, J. G. Cook et al., “Modification of mixed-conifer forests by ruminant herbivores in the Blue Mountains Ecological Province,” Research Paper PNW-RP-527, USDA Forest Service, Portland, Ore, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  91. I.-L. Persson, K. Danell, and R. Bergström, “Different moose densities and accompanied changes in tree morphology and browse production,” Ecological Applications, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1296–1305, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. N. G. Tilghman, “Impacts of white-tailed deer on forest regeneration in Northwestern Pennsylvania,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 524–532, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. B. Horsley, S. L. Stout, and D. S. deCalesta, “White-tailed deer impact on the vegetation dynamics of a northern hardwood forest,” Ecological Applications, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 98–118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. J. Olofsson, H. Kitti, P. Rautiainen, S. Stark, and L. Oksanen, “Effects of summer grazing by reindeer on composition of vegetation, productivity and nitrogen cycling,” Ecography, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. Manseau, J. Huot, and M. Crête, “Effects of summer grazing by caribou on composition and productivity of vegetation: community and landscape level,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 503–513, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. J. Moen and A. Lagerström, “High species turnover and decreasing plant species richness on mountain summits in Sweden: reindeer grazing overrides climate change?” Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 382–395, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. R. E. Longton, The Biology of Polar Bryophytes and Lichens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.
  98. A. R. E. Sinclair and P. Arcese, Eds., Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management, and Conservation of an Ecosystem, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1995.
  99. G. P. Asner, S. R. Levick, T. Kennedy-Bowdoin et al., “Large-scale impacts of herbivores on the structural diversity of African savannas,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 4947–4952, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. S. C. F. Palmer, A. J. Hester, D. A. Elston, I. J. Gordon, and S. E. Hartley, “The perils of having tasty neighbors: grazing impacts of large herbivores at vegetation boundaries,” Ecology, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 2877–2890, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. K. Boege and R. J. Marquis, “Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 441–448, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. J. Bergquist and G. Örlander, “Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages: 1. Effect of slash removal, vegetation development, and roe deer density,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 105, no. 1-3, pp. 283–293, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. J. Bergquist and G. Örlander, “Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages, 2: Effect of seedling vigour,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 105, no. 1–3, pp. 295–302, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. M. Dufresne, R. L. Bradley, J.-P. Tremblay, and S. D. Côté, “Evidence that soil depth and clay content control the post-disturbance regeneration of balsam fir and paper birch under heavy browsing from deer,” Ecoscience, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 363–368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. R. M. A. Gill, “A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 3. Impact on trees and forests,” Forestry, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 363–388, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. B. M. Roche and R. S. Fritz, “Genetics of resistance of Salix sericea to a diverse community of herbivores,” Evolution, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1490–1498, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. M. Rousi, J. Tahvanainen, H. Henttonen, D. A. Herms, and I. Uotila, “Clonal variation in susceptibility of white birches (Betula spp.) to Mammalian and insect herbivores,” Forest Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 396–402, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. G. Vourc'h, B. Vila, D. Gillon et al., “Disentangling the causes of damage variation by deer browsing on young Thuja plicata,” Oikos, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 271–283, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus