Table of Contents
Advances in Ecology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 6742786, 8 pages
Research Article

Estimation of Monetary Values of the Ecosystem Services Flow at the Tidal Elbe River

Department of Development Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3024, Morogoro, Tanzania

Received 31 May 2016; Revised 31 August 2016; Accepted 29 September 2016

Academic Editor: David R. Breininger

Copyright © 2016 H. O. Mangi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Costanza, R. d'Arge, R. de Groot et al., “The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital,” Ecological Economics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Loomis, P. Kent, L. Strange, K. Fausch, and A. Covich, “Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey,” Ecological Economics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 103–117, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Siebert, Economics of the Environment; Theory and Policy, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 4th edition, 1995.
  4. G. Malte, Economic Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Services.Accounting for wetland ecosystem service benefits in cost benefit analysis of river basin management options with case studies from the Elbe River Basin [M.S. thesis], Technische Universität of Berlin, 2012.
  5. H. Siebert, Economics of the Environment—Theory and Policy, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 4th edition, 2008.
  6. M. Common, D. Maddison, Y. Ma, J. McGilvray, and R. Perman, Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Person Education, Harlow, UK, 4th edition, 2011.
  7. G. Atkinson, D. Pearce, and S. Mourato, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, OECD, 2006.
  8. C. Binning, S. Cork, R. Parry, and D. Shelton, A Framework for Applying the Concept of Ecosystem Services to Natural Resource Management in Australia, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Brisbane, Australia, 2001.
  9. S. Heise, E. Claus, P. Heininger et al., Studie zur Schadstoffbelastung der Sedimente im Elbeeinzugsgebiet, Ursachen und Trends, Studie im Auftrag der Hamburg Port Authority, 2005
  10. M. Baborowski, O. Büttner, P. Morgenstern et al., “Spatial and temporal variability of sediment deposition on artificial-lawn traps in a floodplain of the River Elbe,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 770–778, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Hoda, A. Quereshi, D. Krahn, I. Lucius, J. Juurikas, and W. Leal, The River Elbe in Hamburg Case Study Report within the Coastman Project, TuTech Innovation GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, 2012.
  12. J. Hajšlová, J. Pulkrabová, J. Poustka, T. Čajka, and T. Randák, “Brominated flame retardants and related chlorinated persistent organic pollutants in fish from river Elbe and its main tributary Vltava,” Chemosphere, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1195–1203, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Hesse, P. Huntjens, F. Jaspers et al., Report on Evaluation and Assessment of Management Strategies and Tools in the Context of the Elbe Basin, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany, 2008.
  14. B. M. W. Ratter and B. Weig, “Die tide-elbe—ein kultur-, natur- und wirtschaftsraum aus sicht der bevölkerung,” HZG-Report 2012-4, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Ahlhorn, O. Beauchard, A. Boerema et al., Management of Estuaries: The Need to Understand Nature & Society, TIDE Summary Report, Hamburg Port Authority, Hamburg, Germany, 2013.
  16. J. de Kok and M. Grossmann, “Large-scale assessment of flood risk and the effects of mitigation measures along the Elbe River,” Natural Hazards, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 143–166, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. Boumans, R. Costanza, M. A. Wilson, and S. Liu, “Integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal systems,” in The Intertidal Ecosystem: The Value of Ireland's Shores, J. G. Wilson, Ed., pp. 1–24, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Pearce, G. Atkinson, and S. Mourato, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France, 2006.
  19. B. L. Deck and G. L. Chestnut, “Benefits transfer: how good is good enough,” in Benefit Transfer: Procedures, Problems, and Research Needs, T. H. Bingham, E. David, T. Graham-Tomasi, M. J. Kealy, M. LeBlanc, and R. Leeworthy, Eds., Policy, Planning, and Evaluation PM-221, United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA, Washington, DC, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  20. R. J. Johnston, J. Rolfe, R. S. Rosenberger, and R. Brouwer, Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values, vol. 14 of The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, Springer, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Dehnhardt and J. Meyerhoff, “The European water framework directive and economic valuation of wetlands,” in Proceedings of the 6th BIOECON Conference, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
  22. J. Meyerhoff, The Influence of General and Specific Attitudes on Stated Willingness to Pay: A Composite Attitude—Behaviour Model Institut for Landscape and Environmental Planning, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2004.
  23. A. Dehnhardt, Wasserpreise und Ökosystemdienstleistungen-Ökonomische Instrumenteder WRRL; WRRL-Seminar GRÜNELIGA. Ökonomische Bewertung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen, Fachgebiet Landschaftsökonomie. Institut fürLandschaftsarchitektur und Umweltplanung, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
  24. M. Grossmann and O. Dietrich, “Social benefits and abatement costs of greenhouse gas emission reductions from restoring drained fen wetlands—a case study from the Elbe river basin (Germany),” Irrigation and Drainage, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 691–704, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Behrendt and D. Opitz, Retention of Nutrients in River Systems: Dependence on Specific Runoff and Hydraulic Load, Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Lowland Rivers and Shallow Lakes, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
  26. J. Turpie, E. Day, V. Ross-Gillespie, and A. Louw, “Estimation of the water quality amelioration value of wetlands: a study of the Western Cape, South Africa,” Discussion Paper dp-10-15-efd, 2010. View at Google Scholar