Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Volume 2015, Article ID 535216, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/535216
Research Article

Artificial Neural Networks for Estimating Soil Water Retention Curve Using Fitted and Measured Data

Institute of Hydraulic Researches, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Bento Gonçalves Avenue 9500, P.O. Box 15029, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Received 7 August 2014; Accepted 24 February 2015

Academic Editor: Keith Smettem

Copyright © 2015 Tirzah Moreira de Melo and Olavo Correa Pedrollo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Mukhlisin, A. El-Shafie, and M. R. Taha, “Regularized versus non-regularized neural network model for prediction of saturated soil-water content on weathered granite soil formation,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 543–553, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. B. Jana, B. P. Mohanty, and E. P. Springer, “Multiscale pedotransfer functions for soil water retention,” Vadose Zone Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 868–878, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Puhlmann and K. von Wilpert, “Pedotransfer functions for water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of forest soils,” Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 221–235, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Haghverdi, W. M. Cornelis, and B. Ghahraman, “A pseudo-continuous neural network approach for developing water retention pedotransfer functions with limited data,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 442-443, pp. 46–54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Bayat, M. R. Neyshabouri, K. Mohammadi, and N. Nariman-Zadeh, “Estimating water retention with pedotransfer functions using multi-objective group method of data handling and ANNs,” Pedosphere, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. D. Børgesen, B. V. Iversen, O. H. Jacobsen, and M. G. Schaap, “Pedotransfer functions estimating soil hydraulic properties using different soil parameters,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1630–1639, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Zacharias and G. Wessolek, “Excluding organic matter content from pedotransfer predictors of soil water retention,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Merdun, Ö. Çinar, R. Meral, and M. Apan, “Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 90, no. 1-2, pp. 108–116, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. D. Børgesen and M. G. Schaap, “Point and parameter pedotransfer functions for water retention predictions for Danish soils,” Geoderma, vol. 127, no. 1-2, pp. 154–167, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. K. Jain, V. P. Singh, and M. T. van Genuchten, “Analysis of soil water retention data using artificial neural networks,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 415–420, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. J. Rawls, Y. Pachepsky, and M. H. Shen, “Testing soil water retention estimation with the MUUF pedotransfer model using data from the southern United States,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 251, no. 3-4, pp. 177–185, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. H. M. Wösten, A. Lilly, A. Nemes, and C. Le Bas, “Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils,” Geoderma, vol. 90, no. 3-4, pp. 169–185, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Vereecken, J. Maes, J. Feyen, and P. Darius, “Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristic from texture, bulk density, and carbon content,” Soil Science, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 389–403, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Manyame, C. L. Morgan, J. L. Heilman, D. Fatondji, B. Gerard, and W. A. Payne, “Modeling hydraulic properties of sandy soils of Niger using pedotransfer functions,” Geoderma, vol. 141, no. 3-4, pp. 407–415, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. H. Brooks and A. T. Corey, “Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, vol. 92, pp. 61–88, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. T. van Genuchten, “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 892–898, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Baker and D. Ellison, “Optimisation of pedotransfer functions using an artificial neural network ensemble method,” Geoderma, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 212–224, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. J. Leij, W. J. Alves, M. T. van Genuchten, and J. R. Williams, Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Database, UNSODA 1.0 User's Manual. Report EPA/600/R-96/095, US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Okla, USA, 1996.
  19. A. Nemes, M. G. Schaap, F. J. Leij, and J. H. M. Wösten, “Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 251, no. 3-4, pp. 151–162, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. T. van Genuchten, F. Simunek, F. J. Leij, and M. Sejna, “The RETC code (version 6.02) for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils,” 2009, http://www.hydrus3d.com.
  21. E. J. W. Koekkoek and H. Booltink, “Neural network models to predict soil water retention,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 489–495, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Santra and B. S. Das, “Pedotransfer functions for soil hydraulic properties developed from a hilly watershed of Eastern India,” Geoderma, vol. 146, no. 3-4, pp. 439–448, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning representations by back-propagating errors,” Nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, pp. 533–536, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Widrow and M. E. Hoff, “Adaptive switching circuits,” in IRE WESCON Convention Record, part 4, pp. 96–104, IRE, New York, NY, USA, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. Y. Abbasi, B. Ghanbarian-alavijeh, A. M. Liaghat, and M. Shorafa, “Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve of saline and saline-alkali soils of Iran,” Pedosphere, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–237, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Gevrey, I. Dimopoulos, and S. Lek, “Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 249–264, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. D. Olden, M. K. Joy, and R. G. Death, “An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 178, no. 3-4, pp. 389–397, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K.-H. Liao, S.-H. Xu, J.-C. Wu, S.-H. Ji, and Q. Lin, “Assessing soil water retention characteristics and their spatial variability using pedotransfer functions,” Pedosphere, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 413–422, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Mermoud and D. Xu, “Comparative analysis of three methods to generate soil hydraulic functions,” Soil & Tillage Research, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Romano and A. Santini, “Effectiveness of using pedo-transfer functions to quantify the spatial variability of soil water retention characteristics,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 202, no. 1–4, pp. 137–157, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus