Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Applied and Environmental Soil Science / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3713967 |

Mesfin Kassa Cholbe, Fassil Kebede Yeme, Wassie Haile Woldeyohannes, "Fertility Status of Acid Soils under Different Land Use Types in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia", Applied and Environmental Soil Science, vol. 2020, Article ID 3713967, 9 pages, 2020.

Fertility Status of Acid Soils under Different Land Use Types in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Academic Editor: Claudio Cocozza
Received01 Feb 2020
Revised07 Mar 2020
Accepted19 Mar 2020
Published19 Oct 2020


Information on soil fertility status of acid soil of a particular area as affected by land use type is important for developing sound soil management systems for improved and sustainable agricultural productivity. The main objective of this study was to assess the fertility status and effect of land use change on soil physicochemical properties. In this study, adjacent three land use types, namely, enset-coffee, crop, and grazing land use were considered in four districts (i.e., Bolos Sore, Damot Gale, Damot Sore, and Sodo Zuria) of Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia. Soil samples were collected from a depth of 0–20 cm from each land use type of the respective districts for physicochemical analyses. The results showed that land use types significantly affected () soil properties such as bulk density, available P, exchangeable potassium, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable bases (Na, K, Ca, Mg), exchangeable acidity, and CEC. Besides, soil pH, OC, and TN were influenced significantly () both by districts and land use types. The very strongly acidic soils were found predominantly in the crop and grazing lands whereas a neutral acidity level was found in the enset-coffee land use type of four districts. In conclusion, the study proves that land use type change within the same geographic setting can affect the severity of soil acidity due to over cultivation and rapid organic matter decomposition. Finally, the study recommends an in-depth study and analysis on the root causes in aggravating soil acidity under crop and grazing land use types.

1. Introduction

Agricultural sustainability requires periodic evaluation of soil fertility status, which is important in understanding factors that impose serious constraints to crop production under different land use types and for adoption of suitable land management practices [1]. The land-use systems play a tremendous role in influencing nutrient availability and cycling and may also influence secondary succession and biomass production [2, 3]. Soil acidity and associated low nutrient availability are key constraints to crop production in acidic soils, mainly Nitisols of Ethiopian highlands [4]. Haile et al. [5] estimated that ∼43% of the Ethiopian crop land is affected by soil acidity). The soil acidity in Ethiopia is dominated by strong acid soils (pH 4.1–5.5) [6]. The decline in soil fertility is caused by land use type changes [7]. The loss of soil fertility in Ethiopia is related mainly to cultural practices such as low fertilizer use, removal of vegetative cover, and burning plant residues or the annual burning of vegetation on grazing land. In addition to soils developed from parent materials low in carbonate minerals, soil acidification takes place in areas where mean rainfall exceeds evapotranspiration [5]. The existence of high exchangeable acidity in a soil usually demonstrates the occurrence of exchangeable hydrogen, exchangeable aluminum as either Al3+ or partially neutralized Al-OH compounds such as Al (OH) 3+, and weak organic acid ions held at the colloidal surfaces of the soil [8]. The specific adsorption of organic anions on hydrous iron and Al surfaces and the corresponding release of hydroxyl ions could also increase the pH and available P in the soil solution. Similar to the western, southern, and central highlands of Ethiopia, severe soil acidity problem has been reported recently in the highland areas of Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia. However, the degree, extent, and causes of the problem had not been yet examined. The major agricultural constraints in Wolaita area are shortage of land for crop cultivation and livestock grazing, decline of soil fertility, rainfall variability, and pests and diseases. Nowadays, due to increasing population pressure and shortage of land, deforestation and cultivation activities are being carried out on steep slopes, which accelerate soil erosion. Indeed, there are limited efforts in the study area to tackle soil acidity through the use of lime although the scale of operation is not commensurate with the problem. Knowledge on the distribution, degree, extent, and causes of severe soil acidity in the Wolaita can assist policy makers, researchers, extension workers, and farmers to improve the fertility and productivity of the acid. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the physicochemical properties of different land use types and extents of soil acidity of the Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Sites

The study was conducted in Sodo Zuria, Damot Gale, Damot Sore, and Boloso Sore districts of Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia (Figure 1) during 2015. This zone is located at 385 km to south west from Addis Ababa, capital city of the country. These districts were purposely selected because they have high population, land shortage, over grazing, and high agriculture potential from the 12 districts in Wolaita Zone. The sites are located between 037°35′30″–037°58′36″E and 06°57′20″–07°04′31″N with altitudinal range of 500 to 2950 m above sea level. As per the recent nine years (2007–2015) climatic data, the mean annual rainfall is about 1355 mm (Figure 2). The mean average monthly temperature for the last nine years is 20°C [9].

2.2. Soil Sampling Design and Procedure

A randomized complete block research design used for collecting soil samples in the three representative land use types and four districts (Sodo Zuria, Damot Gale, Damot Sore, and Boloso Sore) with three replications of each at three peasant association, which are similar in their agro ecology, altitude, and slope, were selected. After the selection of the three peasant association, the land use types were systematically selected on the basis of contour line, similarity in soil color by visual observation, slope and altitude to reduce their natural difference, and soil type diversity impacts on the soil acidity. A total of 108 soil samples were collected in triplicates from the three land use types of both sites. Each composite soil sample was prepared from 15 subsamples taken by inserting an auger to a depth of 20 cm from randomly marked sampling points of each land use types at both sites.

2.3. Soil Sampling and Preparation

Soil samples were air-dried, ground, and passed through 2 mm sieve at the Soil Laboratory of the Hawassa Research Center. The physicochemical analyses of the soil samples were conducted at Regional Soil Laboratory following standard laboratory procedures. The bulk density determinations were done at Soil Laboratory in Wolaita Sodo University, College of Agriculture. Triplicate soil samples from each sites and land use types were collected.

2.4. Soil Laboratory Analysis

The collected composite soil samples were air-dried, ground, and sieved to pass through a 2 mm sieve except for soil organic carbon (OC) and total N (TN) analysis which were passed through 0.5 mm sieve. Soil particle size distribution was determined by hydrometer using Bouycous method [10]. Soil pH in water was determined with a digital pH meter at soil: water ratio of 1 : 2.5 [11]. The reserve acidity was measured in 0.1 M CaCl2 using the same pH meter at the soil: 0.1 M CaCl2 ratio of 1 : 2.5 [12]. The ΔpH was calculated by subtracting soil pH (KCl) from soil pH (H2O). Bulk density was determined using the core sampling method [13]. Total porosity of the soil was calculated from the soil bulk and the particle densities; where 2.65 g·cm3 was used as a standard value for soil particle density; soil moisture content was measured by gravimetric method [11]. Organic carbon content of the soils was determined following the wet combustion method of Walkley and Black as outlined by Sahlemedhin and Taye [14]. Soil total nitrogen was analyzed by wet-oxidation procedure of the Kjeldahl method [15]. Available phosphorus was measured by following Bray II extraction using spectrophotometer [16]. Exchangeable Ca and Mg were measured from the extract with atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS), while exchangeable K and Na were determined by flame photometer. Exchangeable acidity was analyzed by [17]. Aluminum saturation percentage was calculated as the ratio of the exchangeable Al to CEC of the respective soil samples random powder method, and calcium carbonate content was determined by rapid titration method as described by Black [18]. Available Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu were extracted by diethylene triamine pentaacitic acid (DTPA) method by using AAS [19].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Mean comparisons using the least significant difference (LSD) test at probability of 5% level were done for the different land uses systems and correlation analysis has been done for the different soil properties and land uses systems using the SAS software [20], to see the relationship between parameters.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Land Use Types and Locations on Physical Fertility of Acid Soils

The textural analysis results revealed that 75% of all the land use types considered in this study were found to be clay loam (Table 1). However, sand, silt, and clay content in these soils were varied significantly () among the land use types. According to Hazelton and Murphy [21], who rated all sand, silt, and clay contents of soils into high (>40%), moderate (25–40%), and low (10–25%), the sand contents high in soils of enset-coffee land use of all locations and crop and grazing land uses were moderate (Table 1). The silt to clay ratio was 0.7, which is significantly lower than enset-coffee and crop land uses of Damot Gale district. Averaged over locations, values for Damot Sore crop land (0.8), grazing land (0.8), Sodo Zuria grazing land (0.9), Damot Gale grazing land (0.7), and Boloso Sore (0.8) grazing land uses showed similar trends due to the fact that the soils were might be of similar origin. It has been reported that silt/clay ratios less than unity indicate low values, signifying that the soils are pedogenically ferraltic in nature [22].

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesParticle size distributionSilt/clay ratioTexture classParticle size distributionSilt/clay ratioTexture class
Sand %Clay %Silt %Sand %Clay %Silt %

Enest-coffee35a33a29a1.0Clay loam22a37a25a0.8Sandy clay loam
Crop land39b29b33b1.1Clay loam40b26b50b2.0Clay loam
Grazing land26c38c38c0.9Clay loam38c37a25a0.7Clay loam
CV (%)121211101310
LSD (0.05)78810139

Damot soreBoloso sore

Enest-coffee28a24a352.4Silt loam28a39a25a1.3Clay loam
Crop land41b39b330.8Clay loam36b26b46b1.8Loam
Grazing land31c37c320.8Clay loam36b35c29c0.8Clay loam
CV (%)101310.
LSD (0.05)537457

CV = coefficient of variation, LSD = least significant difference.
3.2. Soil Bulk Density and Total Porosity of Acid Soils

Bulk density value was not significantly () affected by land uses and locations (Table 2). However, numerically the highest mean (1.39 g·cm−3) value of bulk density was recorded on the Boloso Sore crop land and the lowest mean (0.98 g·cm−3) value under Damot Gale enset-coffee land (Table 2), which might be resulted from compaction of soil due to intensive cultivation in all locations of the crop land. Soil bulk density was positively and significantly correlated with the silt and negatively (r = −0.95) with total porosity of the soil, respectively. This might be due to the reciprocal relationship between soil bulk density and total porosity, which shows the degree of soil compaction. Similar results were reported by Takele et al. [1]; Abad et al. [23] suggested that the bulk density of cultivated land was higher than that of adjacent grazing land.

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesBD (g·cm−3)TP (%)MC (%)WHC (%)BD (g·cm−3)TP (%)MC (%)WHC (%)

Crop land1.33b51.51b18.14b21.43b1.16b57.57b18.05b22.06a
Grazing land1.28c53.12c19.95c24.95c1.20c56.24c20.59c26.34b
CV (%)12.0510.037.8310.478.585.868.6310.07
LSD (0.05)0.155.471.512.490.093.461.642.38

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land1.18b54.05b19.70b24.55b1.39b49.41b18.52b22.78b
Grazing land1.14c58.54c20.71a25.08b1.35c51.38c18.44b22.76b
CV (%)4.892.472.312.868.857.756.647.86
LSD (0.05)0.051.410.460.720.

BD = bulk density, TP = total porosity, MC = moisture content, and WHC = water holding capacity.
3.3. Soil Moisture Content and Water Holding Capacity

Moisture content and WHC of the soils were significantly () affected by land uses (Table 2). Considering the effects of land use, the highest (20.71%) in Damot Gale enset-coffee land and lowest (18.05%) crop land. Similarly, the highest moisture content was record (26.37%) and lowest was record from (21.43%) water holding capacity were recorded in the enset coffee and crop land, respectively. Similar results were reported by Mengistu et al. [24] that the water content at PWP was highest (19.71%) under the forest land and lowest in the grazing land (16.17%) and the cultivated land 16.56%.

3.4. Effect of Land Use Types and Locations on Chemical Fertility of Acid Soils
3.4.1. Active and Exchangeable Acidity

The pH (H2O, KCl and CaCl2) values of the soils varied between 5.12 to 7.0, 4.21 to 6.31, and 4.3 to 6.50 in different locations with land use types, respectively. Based on the rating suggested by Hazelton and Murphy [21], the soils can be categorized as strongly acidic to neutral, very strongly acidic to slightly acidic, and extremely acidic to slightly acidic pH (H2O, KCl and CaCl2), respectively. It was lowest in soils of the Sodo Zuria grazing land use, and the highest soil pH value was also recorded in the Damot Gale enset-coffe land use compared to the crop and grazing land soils. Similarly, the lesser average soil pH in the crop and grazing lands is apparently due to the excessive removal of organic cations and associated cations by crop produce and over grazing, respectively, that they would not have a chance to return back and neutralizes the acid soil. In line with this, Mengistu et al. [24] pointed out that although acidity is naturally occurring, removal of plant residues carrying organic anions and excess cations from the farm or paddock is likely to accelerate soil acidification. The change in pH between [pH (H2O) and pH (KCl, CaCl2)] was greater than or equal to one across the soils sampling sites (Table 3). Soil pH (KCl) indicated the potential acidity and presence of weatherable minerals when the difference between pH (H2O) and pH (KCl) is greater than unity [25]. Reserve acidity indication of the soil samples pH was found to range from 4.3 to 6.50 in different locations with land use types. The reserve acidity of soil was always higher than the active acidity. The difference between reserve and active acidity, ΔpH, of the studied soils was positive and found to range from 0.23 to 1.80 in different locations. This indicated that the studied of Damot Sore and Boloso Sore soil samples had considerable more reserve acidity in the soils. Tsehaye et al. [26] reported ΔpH values, which are to be in the range of 0.8 to 1.3 with a mean of 1.0. The reserve acidity values of the soils revealed that the reserve acidity value changes with different sites as well as with the land use types as observed for the case of active acidity.

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typespH H2OpH KClpH CaCl2ΔpH KClΔpH CaCl2pH H2OpH KClpH CaCl2ΔpH KClΔpH CaCl2

Crop land5.30b4.41b4.71b0.900.596.20b4.80b5.32b1.400.90
CV (%)9.516.896.335.747.105.69
LSD (0.05)0.530.330.320.380.370.32

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land6.00b5.80b4.60b0.201.406.00b4.30b4.70b1.701.30
Grazing land6.10b5.72c4.30c0.381.805.60c4.21b4.61b1.401.00
CV (%)9.4010.511.307.6112.6011.10
LSD (0.05)0.590.640.750.460.680.56

3.5. Exchangeable Base

Average exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, and Na ions are presented in Table 4 which showed significant () variation among difference locations within land use types. The exchangeable bases were low in both the soils of the crop and grazing land use types as compared to that of the enset-coffee land use. Hence, the low CEC and exchangeable cations in the crop land and grazing lands are clearly attributed to the presence of relatively low pH. The low-pH soil colloids are sites that adsorb hydroxy-aluminum and cease to function for cation exchange thereby could reduce the CEC of a soil. Exchangeable Ca was dominant in the exchange sites of the soil colloidal materials of the soil studied; this was followed by Mg, K, and Na ions in that order. However, Bore and Bedadi [27] reported that the highest and lowest exchangeable Ca were in the forest (25.4 Cmolc kg−1) and grazing 15.2 Cmolc kg−1) lands, respectively.

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesEx.CaEx.MgEx.KEx.NaPBSEx.CaEx.MgEx.KEx.NaPBS
(C molc·kg−1)(%)(C molc·kg−1)(%)

Crop lantd8.76b4.39a0.24b0.23b70.80b11.26b3.22b0.31b0.14b78.45b
CV (%)4.305.669.605.7210.528.8210.208.608.5011.98
LSD (0.05)0.470.350.200.150.56′0.160.750.180.050.86

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land11.13b3.13b0.21b0.16b71.01a10.43b3.37b0.26b0.26b81.36b
CV (%)4.945.368.807.4010.674.338.036.367.6012.34
LSD (0.05)0.470.

As per the ratings of FAO [28], the exchangeable Na in the soils of the sampling sites was low; the exchangeable Ca and Mg were medium to high in all sites which had high values while the exchangeable K was low except the enset-coffee land use in Sodo Zuria and Damot Gale sites which had high values, while the exchangeable K was low except the enset-coffee land use in Sodo Zuria and Damot Gale sites which had high values in contradiction with the generally held view that Ethiopia soils are rich in potassium [29]. The present studies are in line with Teshome et al. [30] who observed highest and lowest exchangeable Ca in forest and cultivated lands, respectively, in western Ethiopia of Ababo area.

Potassium to magnesium ratio of the studied soils varied from 0.05 : 1 to 0.26 : 1, which indicated Mg-induced K deficiency using the rating of Laekemariam [31]. This can be corrected by K application to bring the K to Mg ratio closer to one. If there is a high preferential K adsorption on the exchange sites of clay minerals, the amount of K desorbing may then decline, resulting in a reduced K uptake at low soil exchangeable K to Mg ratio. Therefore, attempts should be made to supply the plants with potassium in physiologically correct ratio and in a sustainable manner. Loide [32] suggested indicative K: Mg ratios of 0.7 : 1 and 1 : 1 for clay and loamy textured soils, respectively. In silt loam textured soils of Damot Gale, the K: Mg ratio varied from 0.2 to 1.6, while the ratio ranged between 0.1–1.5 in clay textured soils of Damot Sore and Sodo Zuria districts. Accordingly, to these, silt loam soils and clay soils had shown Mg induced K deficiency. Similar trends were obtained on K: Ca ratio in different land uses and sites.

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesK : MgK : CaCa : MgK-index %CaCo3 %K : MgK : CaCa : MgK-index %CaCo3 %

Crop land0.05c0.03b1.99b0.01b23.92b0.09c0.03b3.44b0.02b23.20b
CV (%)7.707.9011.116.5310.736.556.8912.235.4712.70
LSD (0.05)

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land0.07b0.02b3.5b0.01b22.64b0.08b0.02b3.10b0.01b23.05b
CV (%)10.119.8212.105.106.449.106.7110.104.508.33
LSD (0.05)

The calcium to magnesium ratio across studied districts using the rating of Laekemariam [31] has shown the low level of Ca (1–4) on 35% and balanced (4–6) on 60% and low Mg (6–10) on 5% of the samples. These rates are lowest in Sodo Zuria crop land (1.99) and highest in Damot Sore crop land (3.55). This shows that soils under the land uses are of low fertility probably due to intense land use practice and excessive loss of Ca through leaching by the high tropical rainfall [33]. Addition of lime and organic manure can be used to supply Ca and improve soil fertility under the land use types [34].The observed order of cation in the exchange complex (Ca > Mg > K > Na) could also support the existence of Mg induced K deficiency (Table 5). Hence, K-containing fertilizer should be considered for soils of the study areas. It has been suggested that the proportions of the basic cations of the effective CEC are more relevant to plant performance than the actual levels [21]. According to Havlin et al. [35]; the range of critical values for optimum crop production for K, Ca, and Mg are from 0.28–0.51, 1.25–2.5, and 0.25–0.5 C mol·kg−1 soil, respectively. Accordingly, the exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg contents of the soils are above the critical values. However, this does not prove a balanced proportion of the exchangeable bases. Potassium uptake would be reduced as Ca and Mg are increased; conversely, uptake of these two cations would be reduced as the available supply of K is increased [35]. In addition, the ratio of exchangeable Ca: Mg should not exceed 10 : 1 to 15 : 1 to prevent Mg deficiency and also the recommended K: Mg is < 5/1 for field crops, < 3/1 for vegetables and sugar beets, and <2/1 for fruit and green house crops [35].

There was great variation in effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC) of the soils under the different land use systems (Table 6). The highest and lowest ECEC were recorded at Damot Gale enest coffee land and Sodo Zuria grass land, whilst the values (14.10 C molc·kg−1 and 15.02 C molc·kg−1) were recorded in the crop land at Sodo Zuria and Boloso Sore respectively. In line with ECEC, the highest value of CEC (21.20 Cmolckg−1 was observed in Damot Sore enset-coffee land soil and the lowest (17.60) was recorded in Bolos Sore crop land, the CEC value was not consistent showing that there was no significance difference among different land use systems (Table 6). According to Mesfin et al. [36] in Wolaita soils showed that kaolinite is 29.8% for Damot Sore and 7.8% for Damot Pulasa Districts.

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesECECCEC soilCECapECECCEC soilCECap
(C molc·kg−1)(C molc·kg−1)

Crop land14.1019.22b66.2715.3618.80a72.30
Grazing land13.9219.11b50.2816.0719.40b52.43
CV (%)11.1012.01
LSD (0.05)1.562.09

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land15.1720.60b52.8215.0217.60a55.00
Grazing land15.5819.50b52.7015.3518.60b53.14
CV (%)11.610.3
LSD (0.05)1.791.85

3.6. Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, Available Phosphorus, and Carbon to Nitrogen (C: N) Ratio

The data in Table 7 showed the OC, TN, and available P contents of the soils studied. According, to the rating suggested by Karltun et al. [37]; the soil OC content was low in range (1.30 to 1.71%). Moreover, the TN contents of all the soils studied were in the low ranges (0.13 to 0.19%). Hazelton and Murphy [21] classified soil organic carbon percentages of <1.0, 1.0–1.71, 1.72–3.0, 3.1–4.29, and >4.3 as very low, low, medium, high, and very high, respectively. The lowest amount of organic matter in the soil might be due to low addition of crop residue, and continuous cultivation and rapid oxidation of soil OM. In conformity to the present observation, complete removal of aboveground biomass [30, 38], intensive cultivation [39], insufficient application of organic inputs [38] and and Wolaita agricultural land [31].

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesTNAv.POCC : NTNAv.POCC : N
(%)(mg kg−1)(%)(mg kg−1)(%)

Crop land0.16b10.57b1.50b9.370.12b11.74b1.60b13.33
CV (%)6.1010.6511.712.111.3911.1
LSD (0.05)0.051.460.

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land0.13b10.70b1.40b10.760.15b7.44b1.30b8.66
CV (%)5.7011.888.558.6311.598.62
LSD (0.05)

The carbon to nitrogen (C: N) ratio of the soils also varied between 7.36 and 14.16. The carbon to nitrogen (C: N) ratios of the soils at Wolaita zone was significantly affected by soil land use types () (Table 7). On the other hand, although slight numerical variation was observed among the location, C/N ratio was not significantly affected by locations. This indicates that the rate at which total N decreased with land use types was much higher than reduction in carbon. Therefore OM and TN content have direct relation to soil acidity. The present finding was in line with Yihenew and Getachew [40] who reported highest values of C: N contents under grazing land use in northwestern Ethiopian soils. Mesfin et al. [36] revealed that available P with both Olsen and Bray II extraction methods for Wolaita acidic soils were low. The lowest available P (7.44) was observed in strongly acidic soil (crop land of Boloso Sore District). This may be due to the P fixation with Fe and Al as indicated by the favorable acidic soil reactions indicated by the results of the present study.

3.7. Available Micronutrients

The contents of available micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) were significantly () affected by land use, location and their interaction of land use and location (Table 8).The range value of micronutrients for the entire districts in their order is indicated as follows Fe (97.30 to 182), Mn (116.50 to 147.30), Zn (8.98 to 12.77) and Cu (0.23 to 6.33 mg·kg−1) and considering the ratings proposed by FAO [28] across district had sufficient (Fe, Mn, Zn) and Cu low to optimal contents. The highest contents of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu were recorded under the enset-coffee and grazing land uses of four sites (Table 8), while the lowest contents of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu were observed under the crop lands of four sites. Likewise, EthioSIS [6] reported sufficient Mn levels in different soil types of Ethiopia including Vertisols. Znic deficiency is mostly not expected on acidic soil [41]. The results reported that Mehlich 3 extracts comparable amounts of micronutrients (Fe, Zn, and Mn) were the sufficiency for Wolaita soil [31].Generally, Cu content in all soil samples of study districts were found to be yield limiting nutrients, whereas Fe, Mn and Zn levels were sufficient for crop production. It was accounted to low level of soil OM. In line with this finding, the study in some Nitisols of Ethiopia indicated Cu deficiency [39].

Sodo zuriaDamot gale
Land use typesFeCuZnMnFeCuZnMn
(mg kg−1)(mg kg−1)

Crop land182.20b0.31b12.77a143.22b157.70b0.23b11.84b140.20a
CV (%)9.347.8011.4914.6710.88.47.9012.70
LSD (0.05)1.643.320.420.477.101.880.400.78

Damot soreBoloso sore

Crop land129.40b0.80b10.70b147.30b101.70b1.25b8.98b123.80b
CV (%)7.428.409.4010.899.407.2012.6012.70
LSD (0.05)1.301.740.480.524.301.890.170.68

4. Conclusions

The physical and chemical properties of soils in the study area vary from land use types and location. The enset coffe land system and grazing land were medium to higher in values, OC, total N and available P, CEC, exchangeable bases, and micronutrients content especially on the surface layer; this might be due to coarser texture of the soil, and the magnitudes of exchangeable Ca and Mg in land use types were rated as low to medium for Ca and medium to high for Mg. Although it is clayey in texture and relatively better in available P, crop land was lower in soil nutrients with lower pH which has become limiting for crop production in all locations. Therefore, it is suggested that besides physical and biology conservation practices, controlled grazing or cut and carry system and integrated soil fertility management techniques are recommended to improve productivity of acidic soils of the study area.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Mesfin Kassa, Fassil Kebede, and Wassie Haile contributed equally to this study.


The authors acknowledge the staff members of Department of Plant Science, Wolaita Sodo University and Hawassa Research Center of Soil Laboratory, for providing us with the necessary support to conduct this study. This work was supported by Ethiopian Ministry of Education and Wolaita Sodo University.


  1. L. Takele, A. Chimdi, and A. Abebaw, “Dynamics of Soil fertility as ınfluenced by different land use systems and soil depth in West Showa Zone, Gindeberet District, Ethiopia,” Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 489–494, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. Yirga and R. M. Hassan, “Social costs and incentives for optimal control of soil nutrient depletion in the central highlands of Ethiopia,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 153–160, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S.. , M. Akhtar, R. J. Tomas, L. C. Stringer, P. Chasek, and M. Seely, “Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: institutional, fnancial, legal and science‐policy challenges and solutions,” Land Degradation and Development, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 299–312, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Zeleke, G. Agegnehu, D. Abera, and S. Rashid, “Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system,” Tech. Rep., p. 63, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2010, Technical report. View at: Google Scholar
  5. H. Haile, S. Asefa, A. Regassa, W. Demssie, K. Kassie, and S. Gebrie, “Extension manual for acidsoil management (unpublished report),” ATA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2017, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
  6. EthioSIS, Soil Fertility Status and Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas for Tigray Regional State, EthioSIS, Sundan, Ethiopia, 2014.
  7. M. Chemada, K. Kibret, and T. Fite, “Influence of different land use types and soil depths on selected soil properties related to soil fertility in warandhab area, Horo guduru wallaga zone, Oromiya, Ethiopia,” International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 555634, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Y. Gebeyaw, “Assessment of soil fertility variation in different land uses and management practices in maybar watershed, south wollo zone, North Ethiopia,” International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, vol. 1, pp. 15–22, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  9. NMA, Hawassa meteorological service center, Ethiopia, NMA, Addis Ababa,Ethiopia, 2016.
  10. G. J. Bouyoucus, “Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils,” Journal of Agronomy, vol. 54, p. 464, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. L. Jackson, Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, 1973.
  12. K. A. Armson, Forest Soils, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 1977.
  13. V. C. Jamison, H. A. Weaver, and I. F. Reed, “A hammer-driven soil-core sampler,” Soil Science, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 487–496, 1950. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Sahlemedhin and T. Bekel, “Procedures for soil and plant analysis,” Tech. Rep., National Soil Research Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2002, Technical Paper No.74. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. M. Bremner and C. S. Mulvaney, “Nitrogen,” in Methods of soil analysis. Chemical and microbiological properties, et al., Ed., pp. 595–642, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. H. Bray and L. T. Kurtz, “Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils,” Soil Science, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 1945. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Pansu, J. Gautheyrou, and J. Y. Loyer, Soil Analysis Sampling Instrumentation and Quality Control, Balkema, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.
  18. C. A. Black, Methods of Soil Analysis Part II, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI USA, 1965.
  19. W. L. Lindsay and W. A. Norvell, “Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 421–428, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. SAS institute, Statistical Analysis Systems, SAS/STAT Users Guide, SAS institute Inc., Cary, CA, USA, 21th edition, 2009.
  21. P. Hazelton and B. Murphy, Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? CSIRO Publishing, Canberra, Australia, 2nd edition, 2007.
  22. A. Habtamu, G. Heluf, B. Bobe, and A. Enyew, “Fertility status of soils under different land uses at wujiraba watershed, North-western highlands of Ethiopia,” Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 410–419, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. R. S. Abad, K. Hassan, and E. H. Alamdarlou, “Assessment the effects of land use changes on soil physicochemical properties in Jafarabad of Golestan province, Iran,” Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 296–300, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  24. C. Mengistu, K. Kibebew, and F. Tarekegn, “Influence of different land use types and soil depths on selected soil properties related to soil fertility in warandhab area, horo guduru wallaga zone, oromiya, Ethiopia,” International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 555634, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Wasihun and Muktar, “Evaluation of the effect of land use types on selected soil physico-chemical properties in itang-kir area of gambella region, Ethiopia,” Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, vol. 11, pp. 2224–3208, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  26. T. Gebrelibanos and M. Assen, “Effects of land-use/cover changes on soil properties in a dryland watershed of hirmi and its adjacent agro ecosystem: Northern Ethiopia,” International Journal of Geosciences Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  27. G. Bore and B. Bedadi, “Impacts of land use types on selected soil physico-chemical properties of Loma Woreda, Dawuro Zone, Southern Ethiopia,” Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 40–48, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  28. FAO (Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin), Plant nutrition for food security: A guide for integrated nutrient management, FAO, Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin, Rome, Italy, 2006.
  29. K. Mesfin, W. Haile, and F. Kebede, “Evaluation of adsorption isotherm models for potassium adsorption under different soil types in Wolaita of Southern Ethiopia,” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 388–401, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Teshome, G. Heluf, K. Kibebew, and B. Sheleme, “Impacts of land use on selected physico- chemical properties of soils of Abobo Area, Western Ethiopia,” Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 177–183, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Laekemariam, K. Kibret, T. Mamo, E. Karltun, and H. Gebrekidan, “Physiographic characteristics of agricultural lands and farmers’ soil fertility management practices in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia,” Environmental Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 24, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. Loide, “About the effect of the contents and ratios of soil’s available calcium, potassium and magnesium in liming of acid soils,” Agronomy Research, vol. 2, pp. 71–82, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J. R. Landon, Booker Tropical Soil Manual: A Handbook for Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropics and Subtropics, Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  34. B. U. Uzoho, N. N. Oti, and A. A. Ngwuta, “Fertility status under land use types of soil similar lithology,” Journal of South American, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 20–29, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Havlin, S. L. Tisdale, W. L. Nelson, and J. D. Beaton, Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 8th edition, 2013.
  36. B. Mesfin, Abi M. Taddesse, H. Gebrekidan, and A. Melese, “Evaluation of universal extractants for determination of some macronutrients from soil,” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 46, no. 19, pp. 2425–2448, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Karltun, T. Mamo, S. Gameda, and S. kidanu, Towards Improved Fertilizers Recommendation in Ethiopia–Nutrient Indices for Categorization of Fertilizers Blend From Ethiosis Woreda Soil Inventory Data: A Dictation Paper, Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA)/Ethiopian Soil Information System (EthioSIS), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2013.
  38. G. Okubay, H. Gibrekidanand, and T. Berhe, “Soil fertility characterization in vertisols of southern tigray, Ethiopia,” Advances in Plants and Agriculture Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. B. Tegbaru, “Fertility mapping of soils of Abay-Chomen district, Western Oromia, Ethiopia,” Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, 2014, MSc. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
  40. G. S. Yihenew and A. Getachew, “Effects of different land use systems on selected physicochemical properties of soils in Northwestern Ethiopia,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 112–120, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. F. Aref, “Influence of zinc and boron nutrition on copper, manganese and iron concentrations in maize leaf,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 52–62, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Mesfin Kassa Cholbe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.