Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Fuzzy Systems
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 178308, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/178308
Research Article

Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with a Distance Method using Circumcenter of Centroids and an Index of Modality

1Department of Mathematics, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam 530045, India
2Department of Applied Mathematics, GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam 530045, India

Received 14 December 2010; Revised 18 April 2011; Accepted 26 April 2011

Academic Editor: José Luis Verdegay

Copyright © 2011 P. Phani Bushan Rao and N. Ravi Shankar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Jain, “Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variables,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 698–703, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Bortolan and R. Degani, “A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. M. Baas and H. Kwakernaak, “Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets,” Automatica, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Jain, “A procedure for multi aspect decision making using fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. R. Yager, “Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '78), pp. 1435–1437, Albuquerque, NM, USA, August 1978.
  7. J. F. Baldwin and N. C. F. Guild, “Comparison of fuzzy sets on the same decision space,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 213–231, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. R. Yager, “On choosing between fuzzy subsets,” Kybernetes, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–154, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. M. Adamo, “Fuzzy decision trees,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 207–219, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. R. Yager, “A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval,” Information Sciences, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 143–161, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  11. W. Chang, “Ranking of fuzzy utilities with triangular membership functions,” Proceedings of International Conference on Policy Analysis and Systems, pp. 263–272, 1981.
  12. E. Kerre, “The use of fuzzy set theory in electrocardiological diagnostics,” in Approximate Reasoning in Decision-Analysis, M. M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, Eds., pp. 277–282, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Ranking fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory,” Information Sciences, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 183–224, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Murakami, H. Maeda, and S. Imamura, “Fuzzy decision analysis on the development of centralized regional energy control system,” in Proceedings of the IFAC on Fuzzy Information,Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, pp. 353–358, Marseille, France, 1983.
  15. S.-H. Chen, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113–129, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Dubois and H. Prade, “The mean value of a fuzzy number,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 279–300, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  17. E. S. Lee and R.-J. Li, “Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 887–896, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Delgado, J. L. Verdegay, and M. A. Vila, “A procedure for ranking fuzzy numbers using fuzzy relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  19. L. de Campos and G. A. Muñoz, “A subjective approach for ranking fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  20. K. Kim and K. S. Park, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with index of optimism,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 143–150, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  21. Y. Yuan, “Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 139–157, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Heilpern, “The expected value of a fuzzy number,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. J. Saade and H. Schwarzlander, “Ordering fuzzy sets over the real line: an approach based on decision making under uncertainty,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 237–246, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  24. T.-S. Liou and M.-J. Wang, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 247–255, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  25. F. Choobineh and H. Li, “An index for ordering fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 287–294, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  26. P.-T. Chang and E. S. Lee, “Ranking of fuzzy sets based on the concept of existence,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 27, no. 9-10, pp. 1–21, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  27. P. Fortemps and M. Roubens, “Ranking and defuzzification methods based on area compensation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 319–330, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  28. C.-H. Cheng, “A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 307–317, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  29. P. Anand Raj and D. Nagesh Kumar, “Ranking alternatives with fuzzy weights using maximizing set and minimizing set,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 365–375, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  30. J.-S. Yao and K. Wu, “Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 275–288, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  31. X. Wang and E. E. Kerre, “Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (I),” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 375–385, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. X. Wang and E. E. Kerre, “Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II),” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 387–405, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. X. Wang, A class of approaches to ordering alternatives, M.S. thesis, Taiyuan University Technology, 1987.
  34. W. Kołodziejczyk, “Orlovsky's concept of decision-making with fuzzy preference relation-further results,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  35. K. Nakamura, “Preference relations on a set of fuzzy utilities as a basis for decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 147–162, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Modarres and S.-S Nezhad, “Ranking fuzzy numbers by preference ratio,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 429–436, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. L.-H. Chen and H.-W. Lu, “An approximate approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on left and right dominance,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1589–1602, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. L. Tran and L. Duckstein, “Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 331–341, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. T.-C. Chu and C.-T. Tsao, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 111–117, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. X.-W. Liu and S.-L. Han, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with preference weighting function expectations,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 11-12, pp. 1731–1753, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. S. Abbasbandy and B. Asady, “Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance,” Information Sciences, vol. 176, no. 16, pp. 2405–2416, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. H. Sun and J. Wu, “A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on fuzzy simulation analysis method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 755–767, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. Y. Deng, Z. Zhenfu, and L. Qi, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area method using radius of gyration,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 51, no. 6-7, pp. 1127–1136, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. B. Asady and A. Zendehnam, “Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2589–2598, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. S.-J. Chen and S.-M. Chen, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. M. S. Garcia and M. T. Lamata, “A modification of the index of liou and wang for ranking fuzzy number,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 411–424, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  47. L.-W. Lee and S.-M. Chen, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on fuzzy numbers with different shapes and different deviations,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2763–2771, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. Y.-J. Wang and H.-S. Lee, “The revised method of ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid and original points,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2033–2042, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. C.-C. Chen and H.-C. Tang, “Ranking nonnormal p-trapezoidal fuzzy numbers with integral value,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2340–2346, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. E. Valvis, “A new linear ordering of fuzzy numbers on subsets of F (R),” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 141–163, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. S. Abbasbandy and T. Hajjari, “A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 413–419, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. Y.-M. Wang and Y. Luo, “Area ranking of fuzzy numbers based on positive and negative ideal points,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1769–1779, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. Z.-X. Wang, Y.-J. Liu, Z.-P. Fan, and B. Feng, “Ranking L-R fuzzy number based on deviation degree,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 13, pp. 2070–2077, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. Y.-M. Wang, “Centroid defuzzification and the maximizing set and minimizing set ranking based on alpha level sets,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 228–236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. S.-M. Chen and J.-H. Chen, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 6833–6842, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. D.-F. Li, “A ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1557–1570, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. Z.-X. Wang and Y.-N. Mo, “Ranking fuzzy numbers based on ideal solution,” Fuzzy Information and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. B. Asady, “The revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 5056–5060, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar