Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Fuzzy Systems
Volume 2015, Article ID 841485, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841485
Research Article

A Fuzzy Supplier Selection Application Using Large Survey Datasets of Delivery Performance

The University of Houston-Downtown, 326 N Main Street Houston, TX 77002, USA

Received 27 August 2014; Revised 10 October 2014; Accepted 13 October 2014

Academic Editor: Ferdinando Di Martino

Copyright © 2015 Jonathan Davis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. M. Simpson, J. A. Siguaw, and S. C. White, “Measuring the performance of suppliers: an analysis of evaluation processes,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Vijayvagy, “Decision framework for supplier selection through multi criteria evaluation models in supply chain,” International Journal of Management & Innovation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 16–28, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. M. Monczka, K. J. Petersen, R. B. Handfield, and G. L. Ragatz, “Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective,” Decision Sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 553–573, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Wang, S. H. Huang, and J. P. Dismukes, “Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. S. Bhutta and F. Huq, “Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 126–135, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Handfield, S. V. Walton, R. Sroufe, and S. A. Melnyk, “Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 70–87, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. J. Einhorn and R. M. Hogarth, “Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference,” Psychological Review, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 433–461, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–292, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  10. J. Yen, “Generalizing the Dempster-Shafer theory to fuzzy sets,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 559–570, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. L. A. Zadeh, “A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination,” AI Magazine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. D. Korvin and M. F. Shipley, “Dempster-Shafer-based approach to compromise decision making with multiattributes applied to product selection,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. E. Bellman and L. A. Zadeh, “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. B141–B164, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. V. Jain, S. Wadhwa, and S. G. Deshmukh, “Supplier selection using fuzzy association rules mining approach,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1323–1353, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. R. R. Yager, “Toward a general theory of reasoning with uncertainty. I: nonspecificity and fuzziness,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  16. G. J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  17. R. R. Yager and V. Kreinovich, “Entropy conserving probability transforms and the entailment principle,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 158, no. 12, pp. 1397–1405, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. A. Zebda, “The investigation of cost variances: a fuzzy set theory approach,” Decision Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 359–388, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Hadi-Vencheh and M. Niazi-Motlagh, “An improved voting analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis methodology for suppliers selection,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 189–197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Guneri and A. Kuzu, “Supplier selection by using a fuzzy approach in just-in-time: a case study,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 774–783, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F.-H. F. Liu and H. L. Hai, “The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 308–317, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Park and H. A. Krishnan, “Supplier selection practices among small firms in the United States: testing three models,” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 259–271, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Hirakubo and M. Kublin, “The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: the case of electronic components procurement in Japan,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 19–24, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. A. Weber, J. R. Current, and W. C. Benton, “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. M. Ellram, “The supplier selection decision in strategic,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 8–14, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. Verma and M. E. Pullman, “An analysis of the supplier selection process,” Omega, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 739–750, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Degraeve and F. Roodhooft, “A smarter way to buy,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 22–145, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z. Degraeve and F. Roodhooft, “Effectively selecting suppliers using total cost of ownership,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. Vahdani and M. Zandieh, “Selecting suppliers using a new fuzzy multiple criteria decision model: the fuzzy balancing and ranking method,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 18, pp. 5307–5326, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Liu, “Fuzzy criterion models for inventory systems with partial backorders,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 87, pp. 117–126, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. K. Das, T. K. Roy, and M. Maiti, “Buyer-seller fuzzy inventory model for a deteriorating item with discount,” International Journal of Systems Science: Principles and Applications of Systems and Integration, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 457–466, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. J. Usenik and M. Bogataj, “A fuzzy set approach for a location-inventory model,” Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 447–464, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. C.-H. Pan and M.-F. Yang, “Integrated inventory models with fuzzy annual demand and fuzzy production rate in a supply chain,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 753–770, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Kara, H. Gökçen, and Y. Atasagun, “Balancing parallel assembly lines with precise and fuzzy goals,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1685–1703, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  35. T.-F. Liang, “Integrating production-transportation planning decision with fuzzy multiple goals in supply chains,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1477–1494, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W.-H. Tsai and S.-J. Hung, “A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 47, no. 18, pp. 4991–5017, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  37. M.-H. Shu and H.-C. Wu, “Measuring the manufacturing process yield based on fuzzy data,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1627–1638, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  38. F. T. S. Chan, N. Kumar, M. K. Tiwari, H. C. W. Lau, and K. L. Choy, “Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 3825–3857, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Bevilacqua and A. Petroni, “From traditional purchasing to supplier management: a fuzzy logic-based approach to supplier selection,” International Journal of Logistics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 235–255, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Y. Bayrak, N. Çelebi, and H. Takin, “A fuzzy approach method for supplier selection,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 54–63, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Sevkli, “An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3393–3405, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  42. L. A. Zadeh, “Generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)—principal concepts and ideas,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 15–46, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Systems of linear fuzzy constraints,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. A. N. S. Freeling, “Fuzzy sets and decision analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 341–354, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. R. Yager, “On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 167, no. 1–4, pp. 193–216, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. A. Kaufmann and M. Gupta, An Introduction to Fuzzy Sets Arithmetic, Nosfrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  47. G. J. Klir and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information, 1988. View at MathSciNet
  48. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning,” Synthese, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 407–428, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. M. Gupta, R. K. Ragade, and R. R. Yager, Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, North-Holland, New York, NY, USA, 1979. View at MathSciNet
  51. M. F. Shipley and G. L. Stading, “Supplier selection decisions: a fuzzy logic model based on quality aspects of delivery,” in Advances in Computational Intelligence, vol. 300 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 1–9, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Google Scholar