Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Fuzzy Systems
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3982753, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3982753
Research Article

A Fuzzy Simulation Model for Military Vehicle Mobility Assessment

1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
2Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center, Warren, MI 48397, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Harpreet Singh; ude.enyaw.gne@hgnish

Received 10 April 2017; Revised 23 June 2017; Accepted 2 July 2017; Published 7 August 2017

Academic Editor: Fanbiao Li

Copyright © 2017 Aby K. George et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Kempinski and C. Murphy, “Technical challenges of the us armys ground combat vehicle program,” Tech. Rep., 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. S. Dattathreya and H. Singh, “Mission aware energy efficiency in stationary combat vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1108–1117, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. S. Dattathreya and H. Singh, “Silent-watch and energy management strategy in combat vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 418–428, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. S. Dattathreya and H. Singh, “A novel approach for combat vehicle mobility definition and assessment,” SAE Technical Papers, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Lessem, G. Mason, and R. Ahlvin, “Stochastic vehicle mobility forecasts using the NATO reference mobility model,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 273–280, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Nuñez, A. Reid, R. Jones, and S. Shoop, “A virtual evaluation suite for military ground vehicle dynamic performance and mobility,” SAE Technical Papers, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Hornback, “The wheel versus track dilemma,” Armor Magazine, vol. 26, pp. 33-34, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. F. Unger, “Mobility analysis for the TRADOC wheeled versus tracked vehicle study,” in US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  9. “Trafficability of soils, vehicle classification,” Tech. Rep., Ninth Supplement, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, May 1951.
  10. J. S. Kennedy and E. S. Rush, “Trafficability of soils, development of revised mobility index formula for self-propelled wheeled vehicles in fine-grained soils,” Tech. Rep., Eighteenth Supplement. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment, Station, Vicksburg, M. S, March 1968. View at Google Scholar
  11. B. G. Schreiner, “Comments on the VCI system, unpublished memorandum for records,” US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. González, P. Jayakumar, and K. Iagnemma, “Stochastic mobility prediction of ground vehicles over large spatial regions: a geostatistical approach,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 311–331, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. T. Stevens, G. B. McKinley, and F. Vahedifard, “A comparison of ground vehicle mobility analysis based on soil moisture time series datasets from WindSat, LIS, and in situ sensors,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 65, pp. 49–59, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Thulasiraman, G. A. Clark, and T. M. Beach, “Mobility estimation using an extended Kalman filter for unmanned ground vehicle networks,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, CogSIMA 2014, pp. 223–229, San Antonio, TX, USA, March 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Recuero, R. Serban, B. Peterson, H. Sugiyama, P. Jayakumar, and D. Negrut, “A high-fidelity approach for vehicle mobility simulation: Nonlinear finite element tires operating on granular material,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 72, pp. 39–54, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. D. Negrut, D. Melanz, H. Mazhar, D. Lamb, P. Jayakumar, and M. Letherwood, “Investigating Through Simulation the Mobility of Light Tracked Vehicles Operating on Discrete Granular Terrain,” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 369–381, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Family of medium tactical vehicles (fmtv), 2015, http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY1999/army/99fmtv.html.
  18. “How the IED changed the US military,” USA Today, 2015, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/18/ied-10-years-blast-wounds-amputations/.
  19. J. D. Priddy and W. E. Willoughby, “Clarification of vehicle cone index with reference to mean maximum pressure,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 85–96, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Wong and W. Huang, ““wheels vs. tracks”—a fundamental evaluation from the traction perspective,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 27–42, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  21. Wheeled versus track vehicle study, final report, Studies and Analysis Activity, Headquarters U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.
  22. P. W. Haley, M. Jurkat, and P. Brady, “Nato reference mobility model, edition 1 users guide , US Army Tank-Automotive Research and Development Command,” Techn. Rep, vol. no. 12503, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. P. Meyer, I. R. Ehrlich, D. Sloss, N. Murphy, R. D. Wismer, and T. Czako, “International society for terrain-vehicle systems standards,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 153–182, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. C. Larminie, “Modifications to the mean maximum pressure system,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 239–255, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Freitag, “A dimensional analysis of the performance of pneumatic tires on clay,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 51–68, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. E. Maclaurin, “Proposed revisions to mmp based on the results of tractive performance trials with single pneumatic tyres and a modular track system,” DERA/LS4/TR970122/1.0. Defence Evaluation and Research Agency, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Rowland, “Tracked vehicle ground pressure and its effect on soft ground performance,” in Proceedings of the Proc. 4th Int. Conf. of Int. Soc, 1972.
  28. L. A. Zadeh, “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Singh, M. M. Gupta, T. Meitzler et al., “Real-life applications of fuzzy logic,” Advances in Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2013, Article ID 581879, 3 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. “8th americas regional conference detroit,” in Proceedings of the USA - 12-14 september, pp. 12–14, 2016, http://conference.istvs.org/detroit-military/57u1cdctmnjaxge0be6fkan9xrzsot.
  31. R. Vijayagopal, L. Michaels, A. P. Rousseau, S. Halbach, and N. Shidore, “Automated model based design process to evaluate advanced component technologies,” SAE Technical Papers, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus