Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Fuzzy Systems
Volume 2019, Article ID 8953051, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8953051
Research Article

Product Acceptance Determination with Measurement Error Using the Neutrosophic Statistics

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21551, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence should be addressed to Muhammad Aslam; moc.liamtoh@naivar_malsa

Received 21 May 2018; Revised 12 November 2018; Accepted 10 December 2018; Published 1 January 2019

Academic Editor: Rustom M. Mamlook

Copyright © 2019 Muhammad Aslam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Sankle and J. R. Singh, “Single sampling plans for variables indexed by AQL and AOQL with measurement error,” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 396–406, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Jackson, “Effect of inspection errors on waste and on quality of outgoing product,” Industrial Quality Control, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 5–8, 1957. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Diviney and N. David, “A note on the relationship between measurement error and product acceptance,” Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 218-219, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. J. Hahn, “Estimating the percent nonconforming in the accepted product after zero defect sampling,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 182–188, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Zaslavsky, “Estimating nonconformity rates in c-defect sampling,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 248–259, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. G. G. Brush, B. Hoadley, and B. Saperstein, “Estimating outgoing quality using the quality measurement plan,” Technometrics. A Journal of Statistics for the Physical, Chemical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. B. S. Greenberg and S. L. Stokes, “Estimating nonconformance rates after zero-defect sampling with rectification,” Technometrics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Greenberg and S. L. Stokes, “Repetitive testing in the presence of inspection errors,” Technometrics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. F. Nezhad and H. H. Nasab, “A new Bayesian acceptance sampling plan considering inspection errors,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1865–1869, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Chattinnawat, “Investigating design of zero acceptance number single sampling plans with inspection errors,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 662–674, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. S. Fallahnezhad and A. Y. Babadi, “A new acceptance sampling plan using Bayesian approach in the presence of inspection errors,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1060–1073, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. I. Waziri and O. J. Braimah, “Impact of inspection errors on single, double and chain inspection sampling plans,” Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 33–59, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  13. O. H. Arif., M. Aslam, and C. Jun, “Acceptance sampling plan for multiple manufacturing lines using EWMA process capability index,” Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, vol. 11, no. 1, p. JAMDSM0004, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Aslam, F. Wang, N. Khan, and C. Jun, “A multiple dependent state repetitive sampling plan for linear profiles,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 467–473, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Balamurali, M. Aslam, and A. Liaquat, “Determination of a new mixed variable lot-size multiple dependent state sampling plan based on the process capability index,” Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 615–627, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. A. Kanagawa and H. Ohta, “A design for single sampling attribute plan based on fuzzy sets theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. F. Tamaki, A. Kanagawa, and H. Ohta, “A fuzzy design of sampling inspection plans by attributes,” Japanese Journal of Fuzzy Theory and Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 211-212, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. S.-R. Cheng, B.-M. Hsu, and M.-H. Shu, “Fuzzy testing and selecting better processes performance,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 862–881, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. H. F. Zarandi, A. Alaeddini, and I. B. Turksen, “A hybrid fuzzy adaptive sampling—run rules for Shewhart control charts,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1152–1170, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Alaeddini, M. Ghazanfari, and M. A. Nayeri, “A hybrid fuzzy-statistical clustering approach for estimating the time of changes in fixed and variable sampling control charts,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 11, pp. 1769–1784, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Viertl, “On reliability estimation based on fuzzy lifetime data,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 1750–1755, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. E. B. Jamkhaneh, B. Sadeghpour-Gildeh, and G. Yari, “Inspection error and its effects on single sampling plans with fuzzy parameters,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 555–560, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. Sadeghpour Gildeh, E. Baloui Jamkhaneh, and G. Yari, “Acceptance single sampling plan with fuzzy parameter,” Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 47–55, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Turanoğlu, İ. Kaya, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy acceptance sampling and characteristic curves,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Divya, “Quality interval acceptance single sampling plan with fuzzy parameter using poisson distribution,” International Journal of Advancements in Research and Technology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 115–125, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  26. E. B. Jamkhaneh and B. S. Gildeh, Acceptance Double Sampling Plan Using Fuzzy Poisson Distribution 1, 2012. View at Scopus
  27. E. B. Jamkhaneh and B. S. Gildeh, “Sequential sampling plan using fuzzy SPRT,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 785–791, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Venkateh and S. Elango, “Acceptance sampling for the influence of TRH using crisp and fuzzy gamma distribution,” Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 119–124, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  29. R. Afshari and B. S. Gildeh, “Construction of fuzzy multiple deferred state sampling plan,” in Proceedings of Fuzzy Systems Association and 9th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (IFSA-SCIS), 2017 Joint 17th World Congress of International, IEEE, 2017.
  30. R. Afshari, B. Sadeghpour Gildeh, and M. Sarmad, “Multiple deferred state sampling plan with fuzzy parameter,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Elango, A. Venkatesh, and G. Sivakumar, A Fuzzy Mathematical Analysis for the Effect of TRH Using Acceptance Sampling Plans, 2017.
  32. R. Afshari, B. Sadeghpour Gildeh, and M. Sarmad, “Fuzzy multiple deferred state attribute sampling plan in the presence of inspection errors,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 503–514, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. Smarandache, “Introduction to neutrosophic statistics,” in Infinite Study, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  34. J. Chen, J. Ye, and S. Du, “Scale effect and anisotropy analyzed for neutrosophic numbers of rock joint roughness coefficient based on neutrosophic statistics,” Symmetry, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 208, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Chen, J. Ye, S. Du, and R. Yong, “Expressions of rock joint roughness coefficient using neutrosophic interval statistical numbers,” Symmetry, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 123, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Aslam, “A new sampling plan using neutrosophic process loss consideration,” Symmetry, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 132, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. M. Aslam and O. Arif, “Testing of grouped product for the weibull distribution using neutrosophic statistics,” Symmetry, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 403, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Aslam, “Design of sampling plan for exponential distribution under neutrosophic statistical interval method,” IEEE Access, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. M. Aslam and M. A. Raza, “Design of new sampling plans for multiple manufacturing lines under uncertainty,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–15, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. A. J. Duncan, Quality Control and Industrial Statistics, 1974. View at MathSciNet
  41. S. Balamurali and C.-H. Jun, “Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 327–338, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet