Advances in Hematology

Advances in Hematology / 2009 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 461912 | 4 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/461912

Clinico-Haematological Profile of Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukaemia: Report of Five Cases

Academic Editor: Maher Albitar
Received24 Sep 2008
Revised14 Dec 2008
Accepted20 Dec 2008
Published28 Jan 2009

Abstract

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia. Although known as a distinct entity for a very long time, because of lack of distinct clinical features and morphological criteria, it is difficult to diagnose this variant correctly. We herein present the clinical, morphological, cytochemical, and immunocytochemical features of five cases of AMKL. Certain morphological features such as presence of abnormal platelet count, giant platelets, and cytoplasmic blebbing in blasts were found to be important pointers towards the diagnosis. However, none of the features were found to be consistent and thus morphological diagnosis has to be confirmed by cytochemistry and immunocytochemistry.

1. Introduction

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) is a rare entity and accounts for 3–5% of all acute myeloid leukemia [1]. Although described in literature for more than 70 years [2], the clinical profile and morphological criteria for its diagnosis remain ill defined. It can be confused with acute lymphoblastic leukemia ALL-L1/acute myeloid leukemia AML-M0. It may arise de novo or may be secondary to chemotherapy, or progress from myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and/or myelodysplastic syndrome [1, 35]. It has a bimodal peak of distribution (in adults and children 1-2 years of age). Children with Down's syndrome have a particularly higher incidence of AMKL [6]. Here we describe five cases of AMKL with variable clinicohaematological presentations and discuss the diagnostic difficulties faced in arriving at a definitive diagnosis.

2. Materials and Methods

All acute megakaryoblastic leukemias diagnosed in the Department of Pathology of Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, in the period 1997 to 2007, were included in the study. A total of five cases were retrieved. The clinical history and other details were taken from the case files.

Wright's stained peripheral smears and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) smears were examined. Bone marrow biopsy was available in only one case.

Cytochemistry, including myeloperoxidase (MPO), Sudan black B (SBB), periodic acid Schiff (PAS), and nonspecific esterase (NSE), was available in all the cases.

Immunophenotyping was done in 4 out of 5 cases. In 3/4 cases, immunocytochemistry was done by APAAP technique using DAKO antibodies (Figure 3) and in the fourth case flow cytometry results were available.

3. Results

Clinical and haematological profiles of our 5 cases are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.


FeaturesCase ICase IICase IIICase IVCase V

Age/sex6 years/M20 years/F 1.5 years/M2 years/M22 years/M
C/FPallor, easy bruisabilityPallor, dyspnea, gum bleeds, malena, hematemesisFever, petechiaeFever, epistaxis, seizuresFever
Down's syndrome+
Hepatomegaly+++
Splenomegaly+++
Lymphadenopathy+
Hb (g/dL)10.74.94.85.19.4
WBC ( /L)403017.57.17.9
Plt count ( /L)304801460203


Case ICase IICase IIICase IVCase V

Morphology

Peripheral smear*Red cells
Normocytic Normochromic Present Present Present Present Present with tear drop cells
*Blasts (%) 18% 40% 4% 5% 25%
*Blast morphology
(i) agranular blue cytoplasm with cytoplasmic blebbing Present Present Present Present (some blasts were granular) Present
(ii) Giant platelets Present Absent Absent Absent Present
(iii) Platelet budding Present Present Absent Absent Present

Bone marrow aspiration/biopsy*Hypercellular marrow showing megakaryoblasts, micromegakaryocytes, promegakaryocytes (full range of differentiation) Present with clustering mimicking metastasis Present Present Diluted BMA & Biopsy showed blasts with clustering and increased reticulin fibres Present
*Blast (%)25%45%56%25% (biopsy)28%

Cytochemistry

PAS Positive Positive Negative Positive Positive
NSE Positive, fluoride resistant Positive, fluoride resistant Positive, fluoride resistant Positive, fluoride resistant Positive, fluoride resistant
MPO/SBBNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative

Immunocytochemistry

Lymphoid markers (CD5, 7,19, 20) Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative
Myeloid markers (CD13,33) Negative Negative Negative Negative Equivocal
CD61 (Gp Illa)PositivePositivePositivePositiveND

Most of the cases were males (M:F = 4:1). Out of the 5 cases, two were adults while the other three were in the pediatric age group (1.5 years to 6 years).

Four out of the five cases had an acute onset illness and presented with symptoms of marrow infiltration while the fifth patient had a long history of 3 years duration which is described separately.

One patient out of these 4 cases had features suggestive of Down's syndrome (Case IV). Hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy were observed in two and one patient, respectively (Table 1).

All the four cases were anemic. Leucocytosis was noted in 3 while one case showed thrombocytosis (Case II). Giant platelets were present in Case I only.

Peripheral blood blast count was in the range of 4% to 40%. The blasts were large, 3-4 times the size of a small mature lymphocyte with moderate to abundant agranular basophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei were round to oval with fine to stippled chromatin & 1-2 prominent nucleoli. Few blasts in all the cases showed cytoplasmic blebbing (Figure 1). Platelet budding was observed in 3/4 cases (Figure 2).

Bone marrow aspirate smears were cellular in three out of four cases showing blasts ranging from 25% to 56% of all nucleated cells with morphology similar to that seen in the peripheral blood along with presence of micromegakaryocytes and promegakaryocytes. In one of the cases, blasts showed clustering mimicking metastases (Case I). In the fourth case (Case IV), repeated attempts of BMA yielded diluted marrow. Bone marrow biopsy in this case showed blasts with clustering and increased reticulin fibers (Grade III).

The fifth case (Case V) had a long duration illness and presented with weakness and abdominal distension for 3 years.

This patient had massive splenomegaly, 7 cm below costal margin and mild hepatomegaly. The patient was anemic with a normal total leukocyte count and platelet count. Peripheral smear showed a leukoerythroblastic blood picture with presence of tear drop cells and 25% blasts. Bone marrow aspirate revealed 28% blasts. These blasts had morphology and cytochemical findings similar to those of the other cases (Table 2). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia arising as acute transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasm (primary myelofibrosis) was made. Bone marrow biopsy and immunophenotyping was suggested. However, the patient left against medical advice and was lost to follow up.

4. Discussion

AMKL is a rare leukemia, accounting for 7–10% of childhood AML [7] and 1-2% of adult AML [8, 9] and confers a poor prognosis. Patients with Down's syndrome have an increased incidence of AMKL and have a good prognosis [6, 10]. AMKL can arise de novo or as a secondary event post chemotherapy or progress from myeloproliferative neoplasm or myelodysplastic syndrome [1, 35]. In our study, one patient was possibly secondary to MPN (primary myelofibrosis).

It is difficult to diagnose this variant solely on the basis of morphology. However, there are features like clustering of blasts, presence of cytoplasmic blebbing, and platelet budding which may be useful in clinching the diagnosis [7]. In our study these features were present in majority of the cases thus emphasizing their importance. Cytochemistry is not very helpful although necessary to rule out other leukemias. Bone marrow fibrosis if present is a very important feature and is seen in a high proportion of cases [6]. In a study conducted at M. D. Anderson Cancer Centre including 37 cases of AMKL, bone marrow fibrosis was present in 62% of the cases [11], although in our study, bone marrow biopsy was available in only one case which showed fibrosis. Immunophenotyping is necessary to confirm the diagnosis which could be performed in 4 out of the 5 cases.

Thrombocytosis was present in one patient who was a 22-year-old female while the other adult patient had a normal platelet count. All the three pediatric patients were thrombocytopenic. This observation is similar to that seen in other studies [12], thus emphasizing the fact that AMKL can be categorized as either undifferentiated or differentiated, with more differentiated ones occurring in adults [13].

5. Conclusion

AMKL is a rare leukemia. It is important to correctly diagnose this variant in view of its prognostic implications. Although immunophenotyping is the gold standard, it is not available in all the centers. Careful search for features like cytoplasmic blebbing, platelet budding, bone marrow fibrosis, clustering of blasts, and cytochemical positivity for nonspecific esterase which is fluoride resistant can help in correctly diagnosing a significant number of AMKL.

References

  1. J. Von Boros and A. Korenyi, “Über einem Fall von akuter Megakaryoblastenleukämie, zugleich einige Bemerkungen zum Problem der akuten Leukämie,” Zeitschrift für Klinische Medizin, vol. 118, pp. 697–718, 1931. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Jaffe, L. N. Harris, H. Stein, and W. J. Vardiman, “Acute myeloid leukemia,” in WHO Classification of Tumors, pp. 99–102, IARC, Lyon, France, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. T. Pullarkat, J. W. Vardiman, M. L. Slovak et al., “Megakaryocytic blast crisis as a presenting manifestation of chronic myeloid leukemia,” Leukemia Research, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1770–1775, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Miyoshi, S. Okada, Y. Takizawa et al., “Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia developing 11 years after diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia,” Rinsho Ketsueki, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 868–873, 1991 (Japanese). View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. Hino, S. Sato, A. Sakashita, S. Tomoyasu, N. Tsuruoka, and T. Koike, “Megakaryoblastic transformation associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation in the course of polycythemia vera: a case report,” Rinsho Ketsueki, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 500–506, 1992 (Japanese). View at: Google Scholar
  6. B. J. Lange, N. Kobrinsky, D. R. Barnard et al., “Distinctive demography, biology, and outcome of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in children with Down syndrome: Children's Cancer Group Studies 2861 and 2891,” Blood, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 608–615, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  7. U. H. Athale, B. I. Razzouk, S. C. Raimondi et al., “Biology and outcome of childhood acute megakaryoblastic leukemia: a single institution's experience,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3727–3732, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Pagano, A. Pulsoni, M. Vignetti et al., “Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia: experience of GIMEMA trials,” Leukemia, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1622–1626, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. S. Tallman, D. Neuberg, J. M. Bennett et al., “Acute megakaryocytic leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 2405–2411, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Hama, H. Yagasaki, Y. Takahashi et al., “Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in children: a comparison of AMKL with and without Down's syndrome,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 552–561, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Oki, H. M. Kantarjian, X. Zhou et al., “Adult acute megakaryocytic leukemia: an analysis of 37 patients treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 880–884, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Nakajima, H. Fukunaga, M. Amano, T. Fukuda, and R. Ryo, “Megakaryocytic leukemia with thrombocytosis,” Rinsho Ketsueki, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1084–1088, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Eguchi, T. Ozawa, H. Sakakibara, K. Sugifa, Y. Iwama, and T. Furukawa, “Ultrastructural and ultracytochemical differences between megakaryoblastic leukemia in children and adults: analysis of 49 patients,” Cancer, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 451–458, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 Sunita Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

4495 Views | 880 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.