Advances in Hematology

Advances in Hematology / 2012 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.
Special Issue

The Zebrafish as a Tool to Study Hematopoiesis, Human Blood Diseases, and Immune Function

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 214209 |

Arunima Ghosh, Andy Vo, Beverly K. Twiss, Colin A. Kretz, Mary A. Jozwiak, Robert R. Montgomery, Jordan A. Shavit, "Characterization of Zebrafish von Willebrand Factor Reveals Conservation of Domain Structure, Multimerization, and Intracellular Storage", Advances in Hematology, vol. 2012, Article ID 214209, 9 pages, 2012.

Characterization of Zebrafish von Willebrand Factor Reveals Conservation of Domain Structure, Multimerization, and Intracellular Storage

Academic Editor: Elspeth Payne
Received20 Apr 2012
Revised18 Jun 2012
Accepted26 Jul 2012
Published24 Sep 2012


von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited human bleeding disorder and is caused by quantitative or qualitative defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF is a secreted glycoprotein that circulates as large multimers. While reduced VWF is associated with bleeding, elevations in overall level or multimer size are implicated in thrombosis. The zebrafish is a powerful genetic model in which the hemostatic system is well conserved with mammals. The ability of this organism to generate thousands of offspring and its optical transparency make it unique and complementary to mammalian models of hemostasis. Previously, partial clones of zebrafish vwf have been identified, and some functional conservation has been demonstrated. In this paper we clone the complete zebrafish vwf cDNA and show that there is conservation of domain structure. Recombinant zebrafish Vwf forms large multimers and pseudo-Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs) in cell culture. Larval expression is in the pharyngeal arches, yolk sac, and intestinal epithelium. These results provide a foundation for continued study of zebrafish Vwf that may further our understanding of the mechanisms of VWD.

1. Introduction

Vertebrates possess a complex closed circulatory system that requires balanced coordination of various factors that serve to maintain blood flow as well as prevent exsanguination when the system is breached. This is known as hemostasis and consists of a complex array of cellular elements, as well as a network of proteins known as the coagulation cascade. The latter have been highly conserved at the genomic level throughout vertebrate evolution, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and fish [13].

One of the central components of coagulation is von Willebrand factor (VWF), deficiencies of which are the basis for the bleeding disorder von Willebrand disease (VWD). The mammalian VWF gene consists of 52 exons, and the largest, exon 28, contains several functional domains that are frequently mutated in VWD [4]. VWF is a 260 kDa (kilodalton) secreted glycoprotein that assembles into multimers of over 10,000 kDa [5]. At sites of injury, high molecular weight VWF multimers bind to receptors in the vascular subendothelium and tether platelets to form the primary hemostatic plug [6]. Much of our knowledge of VWF function is derived from characterization of mutations in humans and various mammalian model organisms, including mouse, dog, horse, cat, pig, and rabbit [7, 8]. However, relatively little information is available in other vertebrate models, such as the teleost Danio rerio (zebrafish). Teleost fish possess highly conserved orthologs of nearly all blood coagulation factors [1, 3] and have been shown to develop thrombosis in response to a laser-induced injury [9]. Zebrafish embryonic development is external, rapid, and transparent, greatly simplifying phenotypic screening. Circulation begins approximately 24 hours after fertilization, and vascular development has been well characterized [10]. Forward genetic screens with chemical mutagenesis have been performed to study cardiogenesis, vasculogenesis, and angiogenesis [1114].

Recently exon 28 was cloned from zebrafish, and conservation of several VWF functions was demonstrated [15], and in silico assembly of full length zebrafish  vwf has also been described [16]. We now report cloning and characterization of the full length zebrafish vwf cDNA. Zebrafish Vwf demonstrates conservation of primary human VWF domain structure, as well as the ability to form pseudo-Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs) and large multimers in cell culture. Unlike mammalian species, at the stages examined it does not appear to be expressed widely in developing endothelium.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Cloning of Full Length Zebrafish vwf cDNA

Total mRNA was prepared from a single adult zebrafish using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Total cDNA was synthesized with Superscript III reverse transcriptase after priming with random hexamers (Invitrogen). The vwf cDNA was assembled in four overlapping PCR amplified fragments using genomic sequence from Zv6 as a template to design primers (Table 1). Unique restriction sites contained in the overlapping sequences were used to sequentially assemble each of the four PCR products into the vector pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen). The 5′ and 3′ UTRs (untranslated regions) were amplified by RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends, Ambion) with ends that overlapped unique restriction sites in the assembled clone. The external RACE primers were designed with restriction sites for the unique 5′ and 3′ vector sites, NotI and SpeI, respectively.

Reference number SequenceDescription

92AGTCGGCAGCACATACACACvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 1 (EcoRI-BstBI)
93ATCCGGACAGGTCAGTTCACvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 1 (EcoRI-BstBI)
94CCTGCAGCTTAAACCCAAAGvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 2 (BstBI-AvaI)
95AAAGCTTCATCGTCCAGCTCvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 2 (BstBI-AvaI)
96CTGTTGACGGCAAGTGCTAAvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 3 (AvaI-SbfI)
97TCTCCTGATGCTGGACACACvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 3 (AvaI-SbfI)
98GACGGCAGTGTAACGACAGAvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 4 (SbfI-ApaLI)
99CCTGCAAGAGAGCCGATAACvwf cloning, assembly of fragment 4 (SbfI-ApaLI)
116TGCGTGCTGAATCAAACTGTvwf cloning, 3′ RACE (ApaLI-SpeI), SpeI vector derived
128AGTCGCCAGGGAATTCATAAvwf cloning, 5′ RACE (NotI-EcoRI), NotI vector derived
130TTTGATTGACATTTTTATTTATTGTAGTTTAvwf cloning, amplification of 3′ UTR
543gatttaggtgacactatagCGACATGCAAGTGCAGAAGT424 bp vwf riboprobe (exon 28) with SP6 promoter overhang
544taatacgactcactatagggGCTGGGTTTTGCTGTAGGAG424 bp vwf riboprobe (exon 28) with T7 promoter overhang
545gatttaggtgacactatagGGAGTTATCGGCTCTCTTGC441 bp vwf riboprobe (exons 47–52) with SP6 promoter overhang
546taatacgactcactatagggACACAGACTTGCTGCCACAC441 bp vwf riboprobe (exons 47–52) with T7 promoter overhang
CTCGAGAGAATTCCACCACACTGGACTAGTGGATCXhoI-PmeI human VWF linker sequence (includes Myc/HIS tag)

2.2. Multispecies Alignments

Non-zebrafish VWF amino acid sequences were downloaded from the UCSC Genome Browser, [17], aligned using ClustalW2, [18, 19], with output display through BOXSHADE 3.21, Domain comparisons were performed using two sequence protein BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) with the default settings through the National Center for Biotechnology Information,

2.3. Plasmid Cloning of vwf cDNA

The assembled vwf cDNA was cloned into pcDNA3.1/V5-HISA (Invitrogen), which has an 8 amino acid linker, producing pzVwf/V5-HISA. Since expression of tagged human VWF has been shown to be more robust with an 18–20 amino acid linker (R. Montgomery and S. Haberichter, unpublished observations), we amplified this linker from a human VWF/Myc-HIS construct (pVWF/Myc-HIS, linker sequence in Table 1) and cloned it into the 3′ XhoI-PmeI sites (derived from pcDNA3.1/V5-HISA) of pzVwf/V5-HISA, producing pzVwf/Myc-HIS. The human pVWF-EGFP plasmid contains the same linker sequence. pfli-zVwf-EGFP was constructed by inserting the vwf cDNA into Tol2-fli-EGFP [20] in frame with egfp.

2.4. Immunofluorescence Analysis

HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma; St Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma). Cells were grown on cover slips until they reached 50–80% confluence, followed by transfection using FuGENE (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The transfected cover slips were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 10% formalin at room temperature for 25 minutes, followed by fixation/permeabilization at 4°C for 10 minutes in 100% ice cold methanol. After rehydration in PBS for 5 minutes, the cells were incubated with mouse anti-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California) and rabbit anti-calnexin (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, Colorado) antibodies at dilutions of 1 : 100 and 1 : 500, respectively, at 4°C overnight. Cells were then washed three times in PBS (5 minutes each) and incubated with goat anti-mouse antibody coupled to Alexa Fluor 488 and goat anti-rabbit antibody coupled to Alexa Fluor 594, both at 1 : 200 dilutions for 60 minutes at room temperature. After an additional three washes in PBS, the cover slips were mounted with Prolong Antifade Gold (Invitrogen) and viewed on an inverted Olympus (Melville, New York) confocal microscope. Processing was completed with Olympus FluoView version 5.0.

2.5. Vwf Multimer Analysis

HEK293T (human embryonic kidney) cells were cultured and transfected with pzVwf/V5-HISA or an untagged full length human VWF expressing plasmid (pCineoVWF), as previously described [21]. Conditioned medium from pzVwf/V5-HISA transfected cells was purified over nickel columns per manufacturer’s instructions (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Supernatants were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 0.8% (w/v) HGT(P) agarose (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, Maine) stacking gel and a 1.5% (w/v) HGT(P) agarose running gel containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate for 16 hours at 40 volts using the Laemmli buffer system and western blotting as previously described [21]. Primary antibodies were a 1 : 5 mixture of anti-V5 antibody (Invitrogen) and anti-HIS antibody (AbD Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom) or a mixture of monoclonal anti-human VWF antibodies Avw1, 5, and 15 [22].

2.6. Maintenance of Zebrafish Lines and Production of Embryos

Adult zebrafish (AB, TL, EK) were maintained and bred according to standard methods [23]. Embryos collected immediately after fertilization were maintained at 28.5°C and treated with 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU) at 6–8 hpf (hours post fertilization) until fixation in order to prevent pigment formation. At specific time points, embryos were dechorionated or euthanized with tricaine, fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C, and stored at −20°C in methanol up to one month [24].

2.7. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis for RT-PCR of Embryos and Larvae

Total RNA was extracted from at least three biological replicates per experimental condition using TRIzol RNA isolation reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed using random hexamers and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). First-strand cDNA aliquots from each sample served as templates in PCR reactions using primers for vwf.

2.8. In Situ Hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed essentially as described with a few modifications [24]. Full length vwf cDNA in pCR4-TOPO was linearized with NotI and SpeI (antisense and sense transcripts, respectively) and transcribed in vitro using T3 and T7 (Ambion, Austin, Texas), respectively, with digoxigenin labeled nucleotides followed by alkaline hydrolysis per manufacturer’s instructions (Roche). Alternatively, 424 and 441 bp fragments were amplified from full length cDNA using primers with SP6 or T7 overhangs (Table 1) and transcribed in vitro with digoxigenin labeled nucleotides. Prior to hybridization, riboprobes were heated to 80°C for 3–5 minutes and chilled immediately on ice for at least 5 minutes. Stained embryos were photographed using a Leica MXFLIII stereofluorescent microscope with an Olympus DP-70 digital camera. Embedding was in JB-4 resin as described [25], followed by sectioning at 4–6 μm using a Leica RM2265 ultramicrotome. Imaging of sections was with an Olympus BX-51 upright light microscope and Olympus DP-70 high-resolution digital camera.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning and Characterization of Zebrafish vwf cDNA

According to genomic sequence, the zebrafish vwf locus is located on chromosome 18 just downstream of cd9, maintaining conservation of synteny with mammalian species [15]. The full length vwf cDNA was assembled by RT-PCR of four overlapping fragments from total adult zebrafish cDNA, followed by RACE to complete the 5′ and 3′ UTRs (Section 2). The full length sequence is one amino acid shorter than human VWF with 46% overall identity (Table 2). Alignment of zebrafish Vwf to human VWF using BLAST shows clear delineation of all known domains (Figure 1(a)) with varying degrees of conservation (Table 2). The least conserved are the A1 and A2 domains, which encompass the entirety of exon 28 (Table 2). As in mammals, the vwf locus consists of 52 exons, but only spans 81 kb (kilobases), as opposed to 176 kb and 134 kb in the human and murine genomes, respectively. Previous iterations of the zebrafish genome (prior to Zv7) predicted that exon 28 was split into two exons [17]. Both sequence data from this report and previous work [15, 16] demonstrate clearly that the intervening sequence is actually exonic.

DomainIdentities Positives Human zebrafish



Alignment of human and zebrafish amino acid sequences using BLAST ( ). Percentage identity represents exact amino acid matches, while positives indicate conserved substitutions. Domain length is in amino acids.

Other key features of human VWF are identifiable with varying degrees of conservation. The propeptide cleavage site, Arg-Ser, is highly conserved across all species examined except for medaka, and is a part of the extended RX(R/K)R motif (Figure 1(b)) [26]. The putative ADAMTS13 cleavage site in the A2 domain, Phe-Leu, is discernible due to mammalian orthology of flanking residues and is conserved across all fish species (Figure 1(c)). However, the presumed Phe-Leu cleavage site is only somewhat similar to the highly conserved mammalian and avian Tyr-Met cleavage sequence (Figure 1(c)). More importantly, there is conservation of a leucine orthologous to human Leu1603 (Figure 1(c)), which has been shown to be critical for ADAMTS13-mediated proteolysis of VWF [27].

A number of disulfide bonds are required for dimerization and multimerization of human VWF [6]. These are mediated by cysteines at positions 1099, 1142, and several in the C-terminal cystine knot (CK), at 2771, 2773, and 2811, all of which are conserved in zebrafish Vwf. In fact, nearly all cysteine residues are completely conserved, with the exception of Cys1669 and Cys1670, located at the C-terminus of the A2 domain [16] and absent in all fish species examined. There was one cysteine present solely in medaka, four residues N-terminal to the propeptide cleavage site, but its absence in other species makes its significance unclear. There is a cysteine in zebrafish Vwf at position 4, which is not conserved in mammalian species, although genomic sequence information for the other teleost species is absent in this region.

3.2. Expression of Vwf in Mammalian Cell Culture

In order to determine if zebrafish Vwf can multimerize, we expressed V5/HIS tagged vwf cDNA in HEK293T cells. A ladder of high molecular weight multimers was detected using a mixture of anti-V5 and anti-HIS antibodies (Figure 2). This included high molecular weight multimers similar in size to human VWF (Figure 2).

The zebrafish vwf cDNA was cloned into an expression vector in frame with a Myc-HIS tag using the same linker as a human VWF cDNA construct. The latter, when transfected into HEK293T cells, is known to form pseudo-WPBs [28, 29]. These structures are produced after VWF has been processed into high molecular weight multimers in the Golgi apparatus. Using an anti-Myc antibody we were able to identify elongated structures consistent with pseudo-WPBs in zebrafish vwf transfected cells (Figures 3(d) and 3(g)). These were morphologically similar to those found in human VWF transfected cells (Figure 3(a)). Staining with an anti-calnexin antibody to localize endoplasmic reticulum (ER, Figures 3(b), 3(e), and 3(h)) demonstrated no overlap between the structures (Figures 3(c), 3(f), and 3(i)), as expected for WPBs and pseudo-WPBs [28, 29].

3.3. Developmental Patterns of vwf Expression

RT-PCR of whole embryos up to 96 hpf demonstrated increasing levels of vwf expression, with the most intense expression at 96 hpf (Figure 4(f)). Whole-mount in situ hybridization was used to localize expression from the middle of gastrulation (8 hpf) to 120 hpf. Expression of vwf is weakly detectable throughout the embryo at 8 hpf (Figure 4(a)). Stronger expression is observed in 12-hour embryos as a more diffuse pattern throughout the embryo (Figure 4(b)). At 48 hours there is diffuse expression cranially, which extends caudally (Figure 4(c)). At 96–120 hours, strong expression is present in the pharyngeal arches, intestinal epithelium, and inner layer of the yolk sac (Figures 4(e), 4(g), and 4(h)).

4. Discussion

VWD is due to quantitative or qualitative deficiency of VWF and has been described in several mammals, including human, horse, cat, pig, rabbit, and dog [7, 8]. Identification and characterization of the human VWF cDNA [3033] enabled the eventual identification of many of these pathogenic mutations as well as partial or full length sequence information in numerous mammalian species [34]. The zebrafish genome project [35] assisted in the identification of much of the vwf cDNA [15, 16], but this did not include the complete 5′ and 3′ UTRS. We have now completed cloning and characterization of the full length zebrafish vwf cDNA.

We found that vwf displays widespread expression in early embryonic development and then becomes more restricted at the larval stage. Mammalian VWF is widely expressed in vascular endothelial cell beds of the adult mouse [36], and VWF protein is an established clinical pathologic marker of human vasculature [37]. However, it has not been examined in the developing vertebrate. We hypothesized that there would be widespread expression of zebrafish vwf in developing vasculature, but instead found an early broad and then later restricted pattern. A previous study in zebrafish identified Vwf protein expression within the vasculature at the larval stage, although the source was not determined [15]. Therefore one possible explanation for the discrepancy with our results is that larval intravascular Vwf is not produced in endothelial cells but rather comes from the yolk sac or pharyngeal arches. Alternatively, endothelial vwf mRNA expression might not be present until later in development.

The expression seen in early embryonic development may possibly reflect maternally derived transcripts [38], while later expression is clearly of embryonic/larval origin. There is no prior evidence for a role of VWF in gastrulation, although the expression in the pharyngeal arches is intriguing. These structures develop into gills [39], the organs responsible for oxygen exchange in fish. The highest levels of mammalian Vwf mRNA expression have been identified in the lung [36], suggesting the possibility of an evolutionary conserved role of VWF in these structures.

In order to produce functional VWF activity, high molecular weight multimers are assembled in the trans-Golgi, packaged into WPBs, and secreted. This is followed by circulation in the blood and tethering of platelets to sites of vessel injury, forming the primary platelet plug [6]. It has been previously shown that zebrafish thrombocytes will aggregate in a Vwf-dependent fashion and that morpholino-mediated knockdown results in increased bleeding times and hemorrhage [15]. In this paper we have demonstrated that zebrafish Vwf has the ability to multimerize and form pseudo-WPBs in mammalian cell culture. Taken together, these data suggest that the basic mechanisms of zebrafish Vwf function appear to be conserved.

Previous studies have shown evidence for the presence of the Vwf receptor, GpIb, on thrombocytes in zebrafish and chicken [40, 41]. If thrombocytes bind Vwf as platelets do in mammals, one might expect a high degree of conservation of the Vwf A1 domain, which encodes the GpIb-binding site. The A2 domain, which encodes the Adamts13 cleavage site, is required for the production of properly sized Vwf multimers. When cleavage is reduced, vascular occlusion can occur, while when enhanced, bleeding results [42]. However, there are notable differences between mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrate systems. Despite the overall amino acid similarity and conservation of synteny of Vwf, the A1 and A2 domains display the largest degree of divergence when compared to humans. It is tempting to speculate that the A1 domain has evolved a relatively increased or decreased ability to bind thrombocytes in compensation for the latter’s lesser or greater role in the initiation of primary hemostasis. Shear forces required to expose the A1 and A2 domains are likely to be different in zebrafish compared to mammals. Despite their functional similarities, nucleated thrombocytes are clearly different from anucleate platelets, suggesting the possibility that the two function quite differently. Studies of avian thrombocytes, which are also nucleated, have led to the hypothesis that human cardiovascular disease may be related to the existence of platelet rather than thrombocyte-initiated primary hemostasis [41]. Further understanding of the role of thrombocytes and Vwf in zebrafish and avian hemostasis may have potential implications for the treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders.


The authors thank the University of Michigan Sequencing and Genotyping Core, and Dave Siemieniak, Susan Spaulding, Kristen Lessl, and Toby Hurd for technical assistance, and Evan Sadler for helpful suggestions. The authors would especially like to thank David Ginsburg for support and critical reading of the paper. This work was supported by American Heart Association no. 0675025N, the Bayer Hemophilia Awards Program, and the Diane and Larry Johnson Family Scholar Award (J.A.S.), as well as National Institutes of Health P01-HL081588 and R01-HL033721 (R.R.M.).


  1. C. J. Davidson, R. P. Hirt, K. Lal et al., “Molecular evolution of the vertebrate blood coagulation network,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 420–428, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. J. Davidson, E. G. Tuddenham, and J. H. McVey, “450 million years of hemostasis,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1487–1494, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  3. Y. Jiang and R. F. Doolittle, “The evolution of vertebrate blood coagulation as viewed from a comparison of puffer fish and sea squirt genomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 7527–7532, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. W. C. Nichols and D. Ginsburg, “Von Willebrand disease,” Medicine, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. Schneppenheim and U. Budde, “Von Willebrand factor: the complex molecular genetics of a multidomain and multifunctional protein,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 209–215, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. E. Sadler, “Von Willebrand factor assembly and secretion,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 7, supplement s1, pp. 24–27, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Ginsburg and E. J. W. Bowie, “Molecular genetics of von Willebrand disease,” Blood, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 2507–2519, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. Levy and D. Ginsburg, “Getting at the variable expressivity of von Willebrand disease,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 144–148, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  9. P. Jagadeeswaran, R. Paris, and P. Rao, “Laser-induced thrombosis in zebrafish larvae: a novel genetic screening method for thrombosis,” Methods in Molecular Medicine, vol. 129, pp. 187–195, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. R. Kidd and B. M. Weinstein, “Fishing for novel angiogenic therapies,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 585–594, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. N. Chen, P. Haffter, J. Odenthal et al., “Mutations affecting the cardiovascular system and other internal organs in zebrafish,” Development, vol. 123, pp. 293–302, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  12. D. Y. Stainier, B. Fouquet, J. N. Chen et al., “Mutations affecting the formation and function of the cardiovascular system in the zebrafish embryo,” Development, vol. 123, pp. 285–292, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. W. Jin, W. Herzog, M. M. Santoro et al., “A transgene-assisted genetic screen identifies essential regulators of vascular development in vertebrate embryos,” Developmental Biology, vol. 307, no. 1, pp. 29–42, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. E. Patton and L. I. Zon, “The art and design of genetic screens: zebrafish,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 956–966, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Carrillo, S. Kim, S. K. Rajpurohit, V. Kulkarni, and P. Jagadeeswaran, “Zebrafish von Willebrand factor,” Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 326–333, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. T. Dang, A. R. Purvis, R. H. Huang, L. A. Westfield, and J. E. Sadler, “Phylogenetic and functional analysis of histidine residues essential for pH-dependent multimerization of von willebrand factor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 29, pp. 25763–25769, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. A. Fujita, B. Rhead, A. S. Zweig et al., “The UCSC genome browser database: update 2011,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. D876–D882, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Goujon, H. McWilliam, W. Li et al., “A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, supplement 2, pp. W695–W699, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown et al., “Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2947–2948, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. A. Buchner, F. Su, J. S. Yamaoka et al., “Pak2a mutations cause cerebral hemorrhage in redhead zebrafish,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 35, pp. 13996–14001, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. L. Haberichter, S. A. Fahs, and R. R. Montgomery, “Von Willebrand factor storage and multimerization: 2 independent intracellular processes,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1808–1815, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. Schullek, J. Jordan, and R. R. Montgomery, “Interaction of von Willebrand factor with human platelets in the plasma milieu,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 421–428, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  23. M. Westerfield, The Zebrafish Book. A Guide For the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio), University of Oregon Press, Eugene, Ore, USA, 4th edition, 2000.
  24. C. Thisse and B. Thisse, “High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos,” Nature Protocols, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Sullivan-Brown, M. E. Bisher, and R. D. Burdine, “Embedding, serial sectioning and staining of zebrafish embryos using JB-4 resin,” Nature Protocols, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Rehemtulla and R. J. Kaufman, “Preferred sequence requirements for cleavage of pro-von Willebrand factor by propeptide-processing enzymes,” Blood, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 2349–2355, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  27. Y. Xiang, R. de Groot, J. T. B. Crawley, and D. A. Lane, “Mechanism of von Willebrand factor scissile bond cleavage by a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13),” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 28, pp. 11602–11607, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Michaux, L. J. Hewlett, S. L. Messenger et al., “Analysis of intracellular storage and regulated secretion of 3 von Willebrand disease-causing variants of von Willebrand factor,” Blood, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 2452–2458, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. W. Wang, K. M. Valentijn, H. C. de Boer et al., “Intracellular storage and regulated secretion of von Willebrand factor in quantitative von Willebrand disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 27, pp. 24180–24188, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Ginsburg, R. I. Handin, and D. T. Bonthron, “Human von Willebrand Factor (vWF): isolation of complementary DNA (cDNA) clones and chromosomal localization,” Science, vol. 228, no. 4706, pp. 1401–1406, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  31. D. C. Lynch, T. S. Zimmerman, and C. J. Collins, “Molecular cloning of cDNA for human von Willebrand factor: authentication by a new method,” Cell, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. E. Sadler, B. B. Shelton-Inloes, and J. M. Sorace, “Cloning and characterization of two cDNAs coding for human von Willebrand factor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 82, no. 19, pp. 6394–6398, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. L. Verweij, C. J. M. de Vries, B. Distel et al., “Construction of cDNA coding for human von willebrand factor using antibody probes for colony-screening and mapping of the chromosomal gene,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 4699–4717, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. ISTH SSC VWF Database,
  35. S. C. Ekker, D. L. Stemple, M. Clark, C. B. Chien, R. S. Rasooly, and L. C. Javois, “Zebrafish genome project: bringing new biology to the vertebrate genome field,” Zebrafish, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 239–251, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Yamamoto, V. de Waard, C. Fearns, and D. J. Loskutoff, “Tissue distribution and regulation of murine von Willebrand factor gene expression in vivo,” Blood, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 2791–2801, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  37. M. R. Wick and J. L. Hornick, “Immunohistology of soft tissue and osseous neoplasms,” in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry, D. J. Dabbs, Ed., pp. 83–136, Saunders, 3rd edition, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  38. A. F. Schier, “The maternal-zygotic transition: death and birth of RNAs,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5823, pp. 406–407, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. B. Kimmel, W. W. Ballard, S. R. Kimmel, B. Ullmann, and T. F. Schilling, “Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 253–310, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  40. P. Jagadeeswaran, J. P. Sheehan, F. E. Craig, and D. Troyer, “Identification and characterization of zebrafish thrombocytes,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 731–738, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  41. A. A. Schmaier, T. J. Stalker, J. J. Runge et al. et al., “Occlusive thrombi arise in mammals but not birds in response to arterial injury: evolutionary insight into human cardiovascular disease,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 13, pp. 3661–3669, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. E. Sadler, “Von Willebrand factor: two sides of a coin,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1702–1709, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Arunima Ghosh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.