Review Article

Practical Approaches to the Use of Lenalidomide in Multiple Myeloma: A Canadian Consensus

Table 9

Summary of phase III trials evaluating new indications for lenalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

New indications TrialsRegimensResponse ratePFSOS

ECOG E4A03
Rajkumar et al., 2010 [30]
Len + HD dex
Len + LD dex
79%
68%
19.1 mos
25.3 mos
75% (2-yr)
87% (2-yr)
MM-015 Palumbo et al. 2012 [31]
(Age 65–75)
MP47%12 mos65% (3 yrs)
MPR15 mos~70% (3 yrs)
MPR-R79%31 mos73% (3 yrs)
Induction therapy
MM-020 MPT
Len + LD dex until progression
Len + LD dex for 18 mos
In progressIn progress In progress
Palumbo et al., 2011 [32]
Len + LD dex × 4 cycles→MPR20%54% (2 yrs) 87% (2 yrs)
Len + LD dex × 4 cycles→ASCT × 225%73% (2 yrs)90% (2 yrs)

Maintenance therapy after ASCTIFM2005-02
Attal et al. 2010 [33]
Len
Placebo

42 mos
24 mos
81% (3 yrs)
81% (3 yrs)
CALGB 100104
McCarthy et al. 2010 [34]
Len
Placebo

43.6 mos
21.5 mos
~80% (3 yrs)
~80% (3 yrs)

Induction and maintenance ± ASCT in newly diagnosed patientsIFM/Dana Farber trial
VRD × 8→Len maintenance × 1 yr (ASCT at progression)
VRD × 3 →ASCT→Len maintenance × 1 yr
In progressIn progressIn progress

CR: compete response; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; Len: lenalidomide; HD dex: high-dose dexamethasone; LD dex: low-dose dexamethasone; MP: melphalan, prednisone; MPR: melphalan, prednisone, lenalidomide; MPR-R: MPR + lenalidomide maintenance until progression; MPT: melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide; ASCT: autologous stem cell transplantation; VRD: bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone.