The Epigenetic Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Table 1
Key genetic mutations thought to have implications for prognosis in AML. The genetic mutations included in the table are reviewed below. Table compiled with information from [29, 32, 35, 39, 50, 52, 58, 61, 66, 67, 73, 76, 80, 86–96].
Gene
Mutation type
Mutation frequency
Consequence of mutation
Prognostic implications
Initiating lesion
DNMT3A
Mainly missense 60% at R882 Often heterozygous
15–25% AML
R882 mutations reduce binding affinity and catalytic activity—LOF
Likely poorer prognosis. Affected by R882/non-R882, CM, patient age Adverse prognosis in intermediate risk AML
Uncertain
TET2
46% frame shift Also missense, nonsense, and splice site variations Majority heterozygous
7–23% AML 10–20% MPN/MDS
Truncated protein and consequent reduction in hydroxymethylation—LOF
Poorer prognosis in favorable risk CN-AML No effect in MPN, possibly improved prognosis in MDS
Early event, possibly initiating
IDH1 + 2
Amino acid substitutions R132 (IDH1) R172, and R140 (IDH2) Heterozygous
15–30% AML 5% MPN/MDS
Neomorphic gain of function Production of 2-HG, inhibition of TET2 function
Unclear—R140Q may have favorable effect on prognosis R132H/R172K may have no effect However some studies suggest IDH mutations have adverse impact on favorable CN-AML NPM1mut/IDHmut AML has a favorable outcome
Early event, possibly initiating
ASXL1
Nonsense, missense, frame shift, and point mutations
10–15% MPN/AML 10–25% MDS
Uncertain if function lost or gained—research suggests reduced ASXL1 expression
Poor prognostic marker in AML and MPN
Very early, increased leukemic progression in MPN
EZH2
Missense, nonsense, and frame shift
Occasional in AML MDS 7% MPN 3–13%
Truncated SET domain—LOF Gain of function observed in other malignancies
Worse OS in MDS, CMML, and PMF (del)7q poor prognostic indicator in MDS—probably in part due to loss of EZH2
Very early event in MPN, probably not leukemic initiator