Review Article

The Rising Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Table 2

Ongoing and future monotherapy and combination phase I/II trials with immune check point inhibitors in MDS and interim results.

TrialsAuthorsTreatment ArmsEstimated MDS ParticipantsInclusion CriteriaOutcomesComments

A Phase I Trial of Ipilimumab in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes after Hypomethylating Agent Failure (NCT01757639)Zeidan et alIpilimumab alone29HMA failureor HMA refusal
IPSS int-1 with excess BM blasts ≥ 5% or transfusion dependency, Int-2 or high risk;
mCR 7%; PSD 31%; OS 294 days and 400 days with maintenancePhase 1

Stabilization of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Following Hypomethylating Agent (HMAs) Failure Using the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Ipilimumab: A Phase I TrialZeidan et alIpilimumab alone11Primary or secondary failure of HMAs
 IPSS int-1 with excess BM blasts ≥ 5% or transfusion dependency, Int-2 or high risk;
SD >6 m 27.3%; SD >16 m 9%; PSD 9%; median OS 368 d; mean OS 352 d; 3 patients underwent alloSCT and remained in CR at 2,12,18 m post SCTShowed that 3 mg/kg dose is tolerable and can lead to prolonged disease stabilization; alloSCT is feasible post ipilimumab
phase 1

A Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With Blood Cancers (MK-3475-013/KEYNOTE-013) (NCT01953692)Garcia-Manero et alPembrolizumab alone28HMA failure
IPSS int-1,int-2, or high risk
mCR 11%; PR 3%; SD 52%; HI 11%; PD 33%; median OS 23 weeks; 15% alive for >2 yearsPhase 1

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab With 5-azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) (NCT02530463)Garcia-Manero et alCohort 1 nivolumab alone;
Cohort 2 ipilimumab alone;
Cohort 3 nivolumab + ipilimumab;
Cohort 4 azacitidine + nivolumab;
Cohort 5 azacitidine + ipilimumab;
Cohort 6 azacitidine + nivolumab + ipilimumab
120Cohorts 1,2,3 in HMAs failure in any IPSS risk;
Cohorts 4,5,6 frontline therapy in int-2/high risk MDS
Limited data available
Cohort 1: No response noted;
Cohort 2: ORR 30% (includes CR in 1, mCR in 2, HI in 2) in int/high-risk MDS, NR 56%, PD 12%;
Cohort 4: ORR 80% (CR 6 of 17, mCR+HI in 6 of 17, HI-P in 1), PD 12%, Was too early to evaluate 2 pts
Data from cohorts 1,2,4 was presented at ASH 2016
phase 2

Lirilumab and Nivolumab With 5-Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (NCT02599649)Garcia Manero et alCohort 1 lirilumab alone;
Cohort 2: nivolumab + lirilumab;
Cohort 3: azacitidine + lirilumab;
Cohort 4: azacitidine + lirilumab + nivolumab
12 participantsHMA Naïve
Cohort 1, 2 low risk/int-1 MDS
Cohort 3,4 high int-2/risk MDS
No data available yetCohort 1, 2 could have received prior non-methylating agents. No prior anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 or immune activating drugs. Prior anti-CTLA-4 is allowed as long as the last dose was >101 days ago.
Phase 2

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Azacitidine Subcutaneous in Combination With Durvalumab in Previously Untreated Subjects With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (NCT02775903)NARandomizes participants to either
azacitidine alone OR azacitidine + durvalumab
Target MDS participants:
72
Frontline treatment in IPSS-R intermediate >10% blasts or poor or very poor cytogenetics; OR
IPSS-R High or very high risk
No data available yetEnrollment began in June 2016.
Phase 2

Entinostat and Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome After DNMTi Therapy Failure (NCT02936752)Zeidan et alEntinostat + PembrolizumabTarget MDS participants:
27
DNMTi failure (no CR, PT, HI after at least 4 cycles or progression of disease) regardless of initial IPSS-RNo data available yetSingle arm open label study excludes people who received anti-PD1 or PD-L1 or HDACi or anti-CTLA-4 or other immune activating therapy within the last 3 months

A Study of Atezolizumab Administered Alone or in Combination With Azacitidine in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (NCT02508870)NAHMA R/R MDS:
atezolizumab alone OR
atezolizumab + azacitidine
HMA-naïve MDS: atezolizumab + azacitidine
Target MDS participants:
100
R/R HMA: progression at any time on HMA OR no CR or PR or HI after HMA
HMA naïve: frontline therapy in IPSS-R int, high or very high
No data available yetPhase 1

Phase 1 Study to Evaluate MEDI4736 in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (NCT02117219)NAMEDI4736 (Durvalumab) alone OR
MEDI4236 + azacitidine OR
MEDI4736 + tremelimumab OR
MEDI4736 + azacitidine + tremelimumab
Target MDS participants:
73
R/R to HMAs or couldn’t tolerate HMAsNo data available yetPhase 1

Study of PDR001 and/or MBG453 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With AML or High Risk MDS (NCT03066648)NADecitabine + PDR001 (spartalizumab) OR
Decitabine + MBG453 OR
Decitabine + MBG453 + PDR001
Target MDS participants:
70
HMA Naïve
High risk MDS
No data available yetPrior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure as long as tolerated, or adverse events adequately treated with steroids >7 days of the first dose of study drug are not excluded

HMA: hypomethylating agents; R/R: relapsed/refractory; BM: bone marrow; IPSS-R: revised international prognostic scoring system; MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome; mCR: complete marrow response; PR: partial response; PD: disease progression; HI: hematologic improvement; SD: stable disease; PSD: prolonged stable disease; alloSCT: allogeneic stem cell transplant; HDACi: histone deacetylase inhibitors; NA: not available; PD-1: programmed cell death-1; PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T cell associated protein 4; int-1: intermediate 1; int-2: intermediate 2.
HMA failure: failing to achieve CR, PR, or HI after at least 4 cycles.
HMA failure defined as relapse or progression after any number of cycles or no response after at least 6 HMA cycles.
MBG453: T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3) blocker.