Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2008, Article ID 680159, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/680159
Research Article

Identifying Usability and Productivity Dimensions for Measuring the Success of Mobile Business Services

1Department of Business Information Management and Logistics, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 541, 33101 Tampere, Finland
2Department of Software Systems, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 589, 33101 Tampere, Finland
3VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1300, 33101 Tampere, Finland

Received 1 April 2008; Accepted 10 July 2008

Academic Editor: Matt Jones

Copyright © 2008 Maiju Vuolle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Chen, D. Zhang, and L. Zhou, “Providing web services to mobile users: the architecture design of an m-service portal,” International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Steinbock, The Mobile Revolution: The Making of Mobile Services Worldwide, Kogan Page, London, UK, 2005.
  3. J. Gebauer and M. J. Shaw, “Success factors and impacts of mobile business applications: results from a mobile e-procurement study,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 19–41, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Rangone and F. M. Renga, “B2e mobile internet: an exploratory study of Italian applications,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 330–343, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. C. E. Wilson and S. Rosenbaum, “Categories on return on investment and their practical implications,” in Cost-Justifying Usability, R. G. Bias and D. Mayhew, Eds., pp. 215–263, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Dix, T. Rodden, N. Davies, J. Trevor, A. Friday, and K. Plafreyman, “Exploiting space and location as a design framework for interactive mobile systems,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 285–321, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Vartiainen, “Mobile virtual work-concepts, outcomes and challenges,” in Mobile Virtual Work: A New Paradigm? J. H. E. Andrieseen and M. Vartiainen, Eds., pp. 13–44, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. I. Lee, J. Kim, and J. Kim, “Use contexts for the mobile internet: a longitudinal study monitoring actual use of mobile internet services,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 269–292, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Wiberg, ““Anytime, anywhere” in the context of mobile work,” in Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology I-V, Idea Group, Hershey, Pa, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. C.-F. Sørensen, A. I. Wang, and R. Conradi, “Support of smart work processes in context of rich environments,” in Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Mobile Information Systems (MOBIS '05), J. Krogstie, K. Kautz, and D. Allen, Eds., pp. 15–30, Springer, Leeds, UK, December 2005.
  11. N. D. Evans, Business Agility—Strategies for Gaining Competitive Advantage through Mobile Business Solutions, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002.
  12. M. Kakihara and C. Sorensen, “Expanding the ‘mobility’ concept,” ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 33–37, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  13. ISO 9241-11, “Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals—part 11: guidance on usability,” ISO/IEC 9421-11, 1998.
  14. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993.
  15. J. Brooke, “SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale,” http://www.usability.serco.com/trump/documents/Suschapt.doc.
  16. Software Usability Measurement Inventory, Information on line at, http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/sumi/.
  17. J. P. Chin, V. A. Diehl, and K. L. Norman, “Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human computer interface,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '88), pp. 213–218, Washington, DC, USA, May 1988.
  18. J. R. Lewis, “IBM Computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions of use,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. Kaasinen, “User acceptance of mobile services,” in Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, J. Lumsden, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 102–121, IGI Global, London, UK, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  21. H.-W. Kim, H. C. Chan, and S. Gupta, “Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 111–126, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. S. Ryu, Development of usability questionnaires for electronic mobile products and decision making methods, Doctoral dissertation, State University, Blacksburg, Va, USA, 2005.
  23. K. Wehmeyer, “User-device attachment-scale development and initial test,” International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 280–295, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Nielsen and J. Levy, “Measuring usability: preference vs. performance,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 66–75, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. E. Frøkjær, M. Hertzum, and K. Hornbaek, “Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00), pp. 345–352, The Hague, The Netherlands, April 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. K. Hornbæk, “Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 79–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, “Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending,” Management Science, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 541–558, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Tangen, “Demystifying productivity and performance,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. D. A Misterek, K. J. Dooley, and J. C. Anderson, “Productivity as a performance measure,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–45, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. S. Sink, Productivity Management: Planning, Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  31. S. Kemppilä and A. Lönnqvist, “Subjective productivity measurement,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 531–537, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  32. E. Uusi-Rauva, “Yleiskatsaus mittausmenetelmiin,” in Tuottavuus—mittaa ja menesty, E. Uusi-Rauva, Ed., pp. 41–74, TT-kustannustieto, Vantaa, Finland, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  33. B. S. Sahay, “Multi-factor productivity measurement model for service organisation,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. P. Alahuhta, J. Ahola, and H. Hakala, “Mobilizing business applications—a survey about the opportunities and challenges of mobile business applications and services in Finland,” Technology Review 167/2005, Tekes, Helsinki, Finland, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  35. E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, “Beyond the productivity paradox,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 49–55, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. K. E. Murphy and S. J. Simon, “Intangible benefits valuation in ERP projects,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 301–320, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. W. Lynch and J. Riedel, Measuring Employee Productivity: A Guide to Self-Assessment Tools, William M. Mercer and & Institute for Health and Productivity Management, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2001.
  38. D. Zhang and B. Adipat, “Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 293–308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. O. Turel, “Contextual effects on the usability dimensions of mobile value-added services: a conceptual framework,” International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 309–332, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  40. J. York and P. C. Pendharkar, “Human-computer interaction issues for mobile computing in a variable work context,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 60, no. 5-6, pp. 771–797, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. Y. S. Ryu and T. L. Smith-Jackon, “Reliability and validity of the mobile phone usability questionnaire (MPUQ),” Journal of Usability Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–53, 2006. View at Google Scholar