Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2010, Article ID 329351, 10 pages
Research Article

A Case Study of User-Centred Design in Four Swiss RUP Projects

1Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil, 8640 Rapperswil, Switzerland
2Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland

Received 18 June 2010; Accepted 25 October 2010

Academic Editor: Ian Oakley

Copyright © 2010 Ljiljana Vukelja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. UPA. Welt usability tag charta.
  2. S. W. Draper and D. A. Norman, “Software engineering for user interfaces,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 214–220, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1984.
  3. H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt, Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1998.
  4. A. Cooper and R. Reimann, About Face 2.0, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2003.
  5. L. L. Constantine and L. A. D. Lockwood, Software for Use, Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, Mass, USA, 2000.
  6. International Organization for Standardization, Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems, Geneva, Switzerland.
  7. L. Vukelja, L. Müller, and K. Opwis, “Are engineers condemned to design? A survey on software engineering and UI design in Switzerland,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '07), vol. 4663 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 555–568, 2007.
  8. G. Coleman, “An empirical study of software process in practice,” in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '05), p. 315.3, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  9. B. Bygstad, G. Ghinea, and E. Brevik, “Software development methods and usability: perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 375–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. Venturi and J. Troost, “Survey on the ucd integration in the industry,” in NordiCHI, R. Raisamo, Ed., pp. 449–452, ACM, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Peissner and K. Röse, “Usability engineering in germany: situation, current practice and networking strategies,” in Proceedings of the 1st European UPA Conference on European Usability Professionals Association Conference, pp. 105–114, British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, 2002.
  12. N. Moha, L. Qing, A. Gaffar, and A. Seffah., “Enquête sur les pratiques de tests d'utilisabilité,” in Proceedings of the the 17th International Conference on Francophone sur l'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '05), pp. 115–122, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  13. P. Kruchten, The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003.
  14. J. Gulliksen, I. Boivie, J. Persson, A. Hektor, and L. Herulf, “Making a difference: a survey of the usability profession in sweden,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 207–215, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  15. K. Vredenburg, J.-Y. Mao, P. W. Smith, and T. Carey, “A survey of user-centered design practice,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol. 4, pp. 471–478, ACM, 2002.
  16. D. Wixon, “Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner,” Interactions, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 28–34, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Følstad, I. Bark, and J. Gulliksen, “How hci-practitioners want to evaluate their own practice,” in Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 417–420, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  18. T. Uldall-Espersen and E. Frøkjær, “Usability and software development: roles of the stakeholders,” in Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 642–651, 2007.
  19. Stephanie Rosenbaum, Janice Anne Rohn, and Judee Humburg, “A toolkit for strategic usability: results from workshops, panels, and surveys,” in Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CHI '00), pp. 337–344, ACM, 2000.
  20. R. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1994.
  21. B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1967.
  22. R. Buschermöhle, H. Eekhoff, and B. Josko, “Success: erfolgsfaktoren aktueller it-projekte in deutschland,” Objekt Spektrum, pp. 42–47, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. Heinbokel, S. Sonnentag, M. Frese, W. Stolte, and F. C. Brodbeck, “Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projects—there are many!,” Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 226–236, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Keil and E. Carmel, “Customer-developer links in software development,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 33–44, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Gulliksen, B. Göransson, I. Boivie, S. Blomkvist, J. Persson, and Å. Cajander, “Key principles for user-centred systems design,” Behaviour and IT, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 397–409, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  26. N. Khalayli, S. Nyhus, K. Hamnes, and T. Terum, “Persona basedrapid usability kick-off,” in Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), pp. 1771–1776, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2007.